skip to main content
10.1145/3178876.3186141acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web

Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Users organize themselves into communities on web platforms. These communities can interact with one another, often leading to conflicts and toxic interactions. However, little is known about the mechanisms of interactions between communities and how they impact users.

Here we study intercommunity interactions across 36,000 communities on Reddit, examining cases where users of one community are mobilized by negative sentiment to comment in another community. We show that such conflicts tend to be initiated by a handful of communities---less than 1% of communities start 74% of conflicts. While conflicts tend to be initiated by highly active community members, they are carried out by significantly less active members. We find that conflicts are marked by formation of echo chambers, where users primarily talk to other users from their own community. In the long-term, conflicts have adverse effects and reduce the overall activity of users in the targeted communities.

Our analysis of user interactions also suggests strategies for mitigating the negative impact of conflicts---such as increasing direct engagement between attackers and defenders. Further, we accurately predict whether a conflict will occur by creating a novel LSTM model that combines graph embeddings, user, community, and text features. This model can be used to create an early-warning system for community moderators to prevent conflicts. Altogether, this work presents a data-driven view of community interactions and conflict, and paves the way towards healthier online communities.

References

  1. Online appendix. http://snap.stanford.edu/conflict.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Pytorch v0.2. http://pytorch.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Reddit data dump. http://files.pushshift.io/reddit/. Accessed: 2017--10--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Addawood, R. Rezapour, O. Abdar, and J. Diesner. Telling apart tweets associated with controversial versus non-controversial topics. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. W. Allport. The nature of prejudice. Basic Books, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Belák, S. Lam, and C. Hayes. Cross-community influence in discussion fora. ICWSM, 12:34--41, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Binns. Don't feed the trolls! managing troublemakers in magazines' online communities. Journalism Practice, 6(4):547--562, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Blackburn and H. Kwak. Stfu noob!: predicting crowdsourced decisions on toxic behavior in online games. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, pages 877--888. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Burnap and M. L. Williams. Us and them: identifying cyber hate on twitter across multiple protected characteristics. EPJ Data Science, 5(1):11, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E. Chandrasekharan, U. Pavalanathan, A. Srinivasan, A. Glynn, J. Eisenstein, and E. Gilbert. You can't stay here: The efficacy of reddit's 2015 ban examined through hate speech. In Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Cheng, M. Bernstein, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and J. Leskovec. Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Cheng, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and J. Leskovec. Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. In Proceedings of the The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Conover, J. Ratkiewicz, M. R. Francisco, B. Gonccalves, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. Political polarization on twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Datta, C. Phelan, and E. Adar. Identifying misaligned inter-group links and communities. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. N. Djuric, J. Zhou, R. Morris, M. Grbovic, V. Radosavljevic, and N. Bhamidipati. Hate speech detection with comment embeddings. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Faris, H. Roberts, B. Etling, N. Bourassa, E. Zuckerman, and Y. Benkler. Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 us presidential election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Ferrara. Contagion dynamics of extremist propaganda in social networks. Information Sciences, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Fortunato. Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3):75--174, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. D. Garcia, F. Mendez, U. Serdült, and F. Schweitzer. Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media: an integrated approach. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Garimella, G. De Francisci Morales, A. Gionis, and M. Mathioudakis. Quantifying controversy in social media. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM). ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Garimella, G. De Francisci Morales, A. Gionis, and M. Mathioudakis. Reducing controversy by connecting opposing views. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM). ACM, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Giles. Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives, volume 2. Peter Lang, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Golbeck, Z. Ashktorab, R. O. Banjo, A. Berlinger, S. Bhagwan, C. Buntain, P. Cheakalos, A. A. Geller, Q. Gergory, R. K. Gnanasekaran, et al. A large labeled corpus for online harassment research. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference (WebSci). ACM, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. S. C. Guntuku, D. B. Yaden, M. L. Kern, L. H. Ungar, and J. C. Eichstaedt. Detecting depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18:43--49, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. W. Hamilton, K. Clark, J. Leskovec, and D. Jurafsky. Inducing domain-specific sentiment lexicons from unlabeled corpora. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. W. Hamilton, J. Zhang, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, D. Jurafsky, and J. Leskovec. Loyalty in online communities. In Proceedings of 2017 The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. W. L. Hamilton, R. Ying, and J. Leskovec. Representation learning on graphs: Methods and applications. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. C. Hardaker. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. C. Hauser. Reddit bans nazi groups and others in crackdown on violent content. New York Times, October 2017. {Online; posted 26-October-2017}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. M. Hewstone, M. Rubin, and H. Willis. Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1):575--604, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. M. E. Hewstone and R. E. Brown. Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Hinduja and J. W. Patchin. Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. G. E. Hine, J. Onaolapo, E. De Cristofaro, N. Kourtellis, I. Leontiadis, R. Samaras, G. Stringhini, and J. Blackburn. Kek, cucks, and god emperor trump: A measurement study of 4chan's politically incorrect forum and its effects on the web. In Proceedings of the The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735--1780, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. H. Hosseinmardi, A. Ghasemianlangroodi, R. Han, Q. Lv, and S. Mishra. Towards understanding cyberbullying behavior in a semi-anonymous social network. In Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on, pages 244--252. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. C. J. Hutto and E. Gilbert. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. D. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. R. E. Kraut, P. Resnick, S. Kiesler, M. Burke, Y. Chen, N. Kittur, J. Konstan, Y. Ren, and J. Riedl. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. MIT Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. S. Kumar, J. Cheng, J. Leskovec, and V. Subrahmanian. An army of me: Sockpuppets in online discussion communities. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. S. Kumar, B. Hooi, D. Makhija, M. Kumar, C. Faloutsos, and V. Subrahamanian. Rev2: Fraudulent user prediction in rating platforms. Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. S. Kumar and N. Shah. False information on web and social media: A survey. In Social Media Analytics: Advances and Applications. CRC, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. S. Kumar, F. Spezzano, and V. Subrahmanian. Accurately detecting trolls in slashdot zoo via decluttering. In Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on, pages 188--195. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. S. Kumar, F. Spezzano, and V. Subrahmanian. Vews: A wikipedia vandal early warning system. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. S. Kumar, R. West, and J. Leskovec. Disinformation on the web: Impact, characteristics, and detection of wikipedia hoaxes. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. H. Lamba, M. M. Malik, and J. Pfeffer. A tempest in a teacup analyzing firestorms on twitter. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. K. Lee, P. Tamilarasan, and J. Caverlee. Crowdturfers, campaigns, and social media: Tracking and revealing crowdsourced manipulation of social media. In ICWSM, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. O. Levy and Y. Goldberg. Dependency-based word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link-prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 58(7):1019--1031, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. L. v. d. Maaten and G. Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 9(Nov):2579--2605, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. J. N. Matias, A. Johnson, W. E. Boesel, B. Keegan, J. Friedman, and C. DeTar. Reporting, reviewing, and responding to harassment on twitter. arXiv:1505.03359, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Y. Mejova, A. X. Zhang, N. Diakopoulos, and C. Castillo. Controversy and sentiment in online news. Computation and Journalism Symposium, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. T. Mitra and E. Gilbert. Credbank: A large-scale social media corpus with associated credibility annotations. In ICWSM, pages 258--267, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. K. Munger. Tweetment effects on the tweeted: Experimentally reducing racist harassment. Political Behavior, 39(3):629--649, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. C. Nobata, J. Tetreault, A. Thomas, Y. Mehdad, and Y. Chang. Abusive language detection in online user content. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. J. G. Noel, D. L. Wann, and N. R. Branscombe. Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68:127--127, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. U. of Oklahoma. Institute of Group Relations and M. Sherif. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment, volume 10. University Book Exchange Norman, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford InfoLab, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. Manning. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. B. Perozzi, R. Al-Rfou, and S. Skiena. Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pages 701--710. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. T. F. Pettigrew. Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2):173--185, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. T. F. Pettigrew and L. R. Tropp. Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? recent meta-analytic findings. Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, 93:114, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. M. A. Rahim. Managing conflict in organizations. Transaction Publishers, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. J. Ratkiewicz, M. Conover, M. R. Meiss, B. Gonccalves, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media. Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. M. H. Ribeiro, P. H. Calais, V. A. Almeida, and W. Meira Jr. “everything i disagree with is# fakenews”: Correlating political polarization and spread of misinformation. arXiv:1706.05924, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. H. Saif, M. Fernandez, M. Rowe, and H. Alani. On the role of semantics for detecting pro-isis stances on social media. In Proceedings of the CEUR Workshop, volume 1690, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5):513--523, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. M. Sherif. Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology, volume 29. Psychology Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. S. Siegal. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-hill, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. L. A. Silva, M. Mondal, D. Correa, F. Benevenuto, and I. Weber. Analyzing the targets of hate in online social media. In Proceedings of the 2016 The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. H. Tajfel. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1):1--39, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. H. Tajfel. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. C. Tan and L. Lee. All who wander: On the prevalence and characteristics of multi-community engagement. In Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Mar. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. W. Wang, L. Chen, K. Thirunarayan, and A. P. Sheth. Cursing in english on twitter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW). ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. E. Wulczyn, N. Thain, and L. Dixon. Ex machina: Personal attacks seen at scale. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1391--1399. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. J. Xie, S. Kelley, and B. K. Szymanski. Overlapping community detection in networks: The state-of-the-art and comparative study. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(4):43, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. T. Yasseri, R. Sumi, A. Rung, A. Kornai, and J. Kertész. Dynamics of conflicts in wikipedia. PloS One, 7(6):e38869, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. S. Zannettou, T. Caulfield, E. De Cristofaro, N. Kourtelris, I. Leontiadis, M. Sirivianos, G. Stringhini, and J. Blackburn. The web centipede: understanding how web communities influence each other through the lens of mainstream and alternative news sources. In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference, pages 405--417. ACM, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. J. Zhang, W. Hamilton, C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, D. Jurafsky, and J. Leskovec. Community identity and user engagement in a multi-community landscape. In Proceedings of 2017 The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WWW '18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference
            April 2018
            2000 pages
            ISBN:9781450356398

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

            Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 April 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            WWW '18 Paper Acceptance Rate170of1,155submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format