skip to main content
10.1145/3196709.3196747acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Designing Interactive Visual Supports for Children with Special Needs in a School Setting

Published:08 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visual support (VS) is one of the effective ways of facilitating activities of children with neurodevelopmental disorder (ND). This paper reports on an interactive VS provided by a large-scale floor projection system in an augmented gymnasium called FUTUREGYM, designed for children with ND. The study focuses on students' cleaning, and two interactive VS activities-Mop Game, an exergame involving group cleaning, and Mop Guide, a VS for training about vocational cleaning-were designed with the teachers with the aim of motivating students toward cleaning and help them acquire fundamental cleaning skills. The study attempts to design a VS for cleaning that is suitable for the students by conducting an empathic design approach, which helps us understand what are the problems, obtain new perspectives, and gather ideas into demonstrative prototypes by sharing values and thoughts with the teachers and their students. This is a case study of deploying an empathic design approach in a special needs school setting.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

disfp334.mp4

mp4

18.4 MB

References

  1. AKQA. 2017. Nike Rise 2.0. Retrieved August 30, 2017 from https://www.akqa.com/work/nike/rise2015/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nuria Aresti-bartolome and Begonya Garcia-zapirain. 2014. Technologies as Support Tools for Persons with Autistic Spectrum Disorder?: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, 8: 7767--7802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sara Bernardini, Kas´ka Porayska-Pomsta, and Tim J. Smith. 2014. ECHOES?: An intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism ECHOES?: an Intelligent Serious Game for Fostering Social Communication in Children with Autism. Information Sciences 264: 41--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Arpita Bhattacharya, Mirko Gelsomini, Patricia PérezFuster, Gregory D. Abowd, and Agata Rozga. 2015. Designing motion-based activities to engage students with autism in classroom settings. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '15, 69--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. O Bimber and R Raskar. 2005. Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nicole Blubaugh and Joanne Kohlmann. 2006. TEACCH Model and Children With Autism. Teaching Elementary Physical Education 17, 6: 16--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomas Both and Dave Baggereor. 2017. d.school Bootcamp Bootleg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lal Bozgeyikli, Evren Bozgeyikli, Matthew Clevenger, Andrew Raij, Redwan Alqasemi, Stephen Sundarrao, and Rajiv Dubey. 2015. VR4VR: Vocational Rehabilitation of Individuals with Disabilities in Immersive Virtual Reality Environments. In PETRA '15 Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, 54:1--54:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Michael E. Bratman. 1992. Shared Cooperative Activity. The Philosophical Review 101, 2: 327--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Miao-en Chien, Cyun-meng Jheng, Ni-miao Lin, Hsien-hui Tang, Paul Taele, Wen-sheng Tseng, and Mike Y Chen. 2015. iCAN?: A tablet-based pedagogical system for improving communication skills of children with autism. Journal of Human Computer Studies 73: 79--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Deborah L. Christensen, Jon Baio, Kim Van Naarden Braun, Deborah Bilder, Jane Charles, John N. Constantino, Julie Daniels, Maureen S. Durkin, Robert T. Fitzgerald, Margaret Kurzius-Spencer, Li-Ching Lee, Sydney Pettygrove, Cordelia Robinson, Eldon Schulz, Chris Wells, Martha S. Wingate, Walter Zahorodny, and Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp. 2016. Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, USA, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Franceli L. Cibrian, Deysi H. Ortega, Lizbeth Escobedo, and Monica Tentori. 2015. Reflections from a Long-term Deployment Study to Design Novel Interactive Surfaces for Children with Autism. In Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 167-- 176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenneth M Colby. 1973. The Rationale for Computer Based Treatment of Language Difficulties in Nonspeaking Austistic Children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia 3, 3: 254--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lee Crossley. 2003. Building Emotions in Design. The Design Journal 6, 3: 35--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lizbeth Escobedo, Mónica Tentori, Eduardo Quintana, Jesus Favela, and Daniel Garcia-Rosas. 2014. Using Augmented Reality to Help Children with Autism Stay Focused. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 1: 38-- 46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2015. In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 74: 93--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Raine Kajastila, Leo Holsti, and Perttu Hämäläinen. 2016. The Augmented Climbing Wall: High-Exertion Proximity Interaction on a Wall-Sized Interactive Surface. In CHI '16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 758--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Julie A Kientz, Gillian R Hayes, Tracy L Westeyn, Thad Starner, and Gregory D Abowd. 2007. Pervasive Computing and Autism: Assisting Caregivers of Children with Special Needs. IEEE Pervasive Computing 6, 1: 28--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B Lawson. 2006. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Elsevier/Architectural.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorothy Leonard and Jeffrey F. Rayport. 1997. Spark Innovation Through Empathic Design. Harvard Business Review 75, 6: 102--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M L Max and J C Burke. 1997. Virtual reality for autism communication and education, with lessons for medical training simulators. Studies in health technology and informatics 39: 46-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems E77--D, 12: 1321--1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. T Mooij. 1999. Guidelines to pedagogical use of ICT in education. In 8th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Joan Mora-guiard, Ciera Crowell, Narcis Pares, and Pamela Heaton. 2016. Lands of Fog: Helping Children with Autism in Social Interaction through a Full-Body Interactive Experience. In IDC '16 Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 262--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Joan Mora-Guiard, Ciera Crowell, Narcis Pares, and Pamela Heaton. 2016. Sparking social initiation behaviors in children with Autism through full-body Interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Michael M Mueller, Christine M Palkovic, and Cynthia S Maynard. 2007. Errorless learning: review and practical application for teaching children with pervasive developmental disorders. Psychology in the Schools 44, 7: 691--700.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Samuel L Odom, William H Brown, Timothy Frey, Necdet Karasu, Lora Lee Smith-canter, and Phillip S Strain. 2003. Evidence-Based Practices for Young Children with Autism: Contributions for SingleSubject Design Research. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 18, 3: 166--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. T Ogilvie and J Liedtka. 2011. Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Toolkit for Managers. Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Narcis Pares, Paul Masri, Gerard Van Wolferen, and Chris Creed. 2005. Achieving dialogue with children with severe autism in an adaptive multisensory interaction: The "MEDIATE" project. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 6: 734--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kathleen Ann Quill. 1995. Visually Cued Instruction for Children with Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders. Focus on Autistic Behavior 10, 3: 10--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. M. Rao, Shaila and Brenda Gagie. 2006. Learning Through Seeing and Doing?: Visual Supports for Children With Autism. Teaching Exceptional Children 38, 6: 26--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Anne M Roux, Paul T Shattuck, Benjamin P Cooper, Kristy A Anderson, Mary Wagner, and Sarah C Narendorf. 2013. Postsecondary Employment Experiences Among Young Adults With an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 52, 9: 931--939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. SAGA. 2017. Lü - Interactive Playground. Retrieved August 24, 2017 from http://www.play-lu.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ed Smeets and Ton Mooij. 2001. Pupil-centred learning, ICT, and teacher behaviour: observations in educational practice. British Journal of Educational Technology 32, 4: 403--417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Ferdinand Streicher, Daniel Weiß, Jei Lee, Billy Boukis, and Thomas Mayer. 2017. T-T-T (Table Tennis Trainer). Retrieved August 30, 2017 from http://ttt3000.de/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jane Fulton Suri. 2005. Thoughtless acts?: Observations on intuitive design. Chronicle Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kenji Suzuki, Taku Hachisu, and Kazuki Iida. 2016. EnhancedTouch: A Smart Bracelet for Enhancing Human- Human Physical Touch. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 1282--1293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Gulnoza Yakubova Teresa Taber-doughty. 2013. Brief Report?: Learning Via the Electronic Interactive Whiteboard for Two Students with Autism and a Student with Moderate Intellectual Disability. 1465-- 1472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Issey Takahashi, Mika Oki, Baptiste Bourreau, Itaru Kitahara, and Kenji Suzuki. 2017. FUTUREGYM: A gymnasium with interactive floor projection for children with special needs. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 15: 37--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Monica Tentori, Lizbeth Escobedo, and Gabriela Balderas. 2015. A smart environment for children with autism. IEEE Pervasive Computing 14, 2: 42--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Monica Tentori, Lizbeth Escobedo, Carlos Hernandez, Aleksandar Matic, and Gillian R Hayes. 2016. Pervasive Displays in Classrooms of Children with Severe Autism. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 3: 48-- 57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Catherine Tissot and Roy Evans. 2003. Visual Teaching Strategies for Children with Autism. Early Child Development and Care 173, 4: 425--433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Tokyo Metropolitan Board of Education. 2016. Text book for cleaning skills test in special needs school. Retrieved March 12, 2018 from http://www.kyoiku.metro.tokyo.jp/school/study_mater ial/special_needs_education/cleaning_skills_test.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing Interactive Visual Supports for Children with Special Needs in a School Setting

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        June 2018
        1418 pages
        ISBN:9781450351980
        DOI:10.1145/3196709

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        DIS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader