skip to main content
article
Free Access

Construction of relations in relational databases

Published:01 June 1980Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Using a nonprocedural language for query formulation requires certain automatization of a query answering process. Given a query for creation of a new relation, the problem is to find an efficient procedure which produces this relation from a given relational database. We concentrate upon sequences of join operations which losslessly produce a relation required by a query. A new property of such sequences is analyzed which provides a basis for the presented algorithms that construct an efficient join procedure. The algorithms have polynomial complexity. A modified AND/OR graph is used for the display of a given set of dependencies and a collection of relations representing a database.

References

  1. 1 AHO, A.V., BEERI, C., AND ULLMAN, J.D. The theory ofjoins in relational data bases. Proc. 18th IEEE Syrup. Foundations of Computer Science, 1977, pp. 495-504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 ARMSTRONG, W.W. Dependency structures of data base relationships. Information Processing 74, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 580-583.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 BERNSTEIN, P.A., AND BEERI, C. An algorithmic approach to normalization of relational data base schemes. Tech. Rep. CSRG-73, Computer Systems Research Group, Univ. Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 CARLSON, C.R., AND KAPLAN, R.S. A generalized access path model and its application to a relational data base system. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, June 1976, pp. 143-154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5 CHANG, S.K., AND KE, J.S. Database skeleton and its application to fuzzy query translation. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering SE-4, 1 (Jan. 1978), 31-44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 CODD, E.F. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Comm. ACM 13, 6 (June 1970), 377-387. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 CODD, E.F. Further normalization of the data base relational model. In Courant Computer Science Symposium, vol. 6, Data Base Systems, R. Rustin, Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1972, pp. 33-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 CODD, E.F. Recent investivations in relational data base systems. Information Processing 74, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 1017-1021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 CODD, E.F. Relational completeness of data base sublanguages. In Courant Computer Science Symposium, vol. 6, Data Base Systems, R. Rustin, Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1972, pp. 65-98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 DELOBEL, C., AND CASEY, R.G. Decomposition of a data base and the theory of Boolean switching functions. IBM'J. Res. Dev. 17, 5 (Sept. 1973), 374-386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11 DIJKSTRA, E.W. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numer. Math. 1 {1959), 269-271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 GHOSH, S.P. Data Base Organization for Data Management. Academic Press, New York, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 GOTLIEB, L.R. Computing joins of relations. Proc ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, San Jose, Calif., 1975, pp. 55-63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14 HUFFMAN, D.A. A method for the construction of minimum redundancy codes. Proc IRE 40, 10 (Sept. 1952), 1098-1101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15 KNUTH, D.E. The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 1. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975, pp. 402-404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16 LOZINSKII, E.L. Performance consideration in relational data base design. In Databases: Improving Usability and Responsiveness, B. Shneiderman, Ed. Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp. 272-294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 NXLSSON, N.J. Problem-Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18 RISSANEN, J. Independent components of relations. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2, 4 (Dec. 1977), 317-325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19 SCHENK, K.L., AND PINKERT, J.R. An algorithm for servicing multirelational queries. Proc. A CM.S{GMOD Int. Conf. Management of Data, Toronto, Canada, 1977, pp. 10-20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 SENKO, M.E. Data structures and data accessing in data base systems: Past, present, future. IBM Syst. J. 16, 3 (1977), 208-257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Construction of relations in relational databases

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader