skip to main content
10.1145/3209415.3209433acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Open Data in Support of E-governance Evaluation: A Public Value Framework

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Governments all over the world have paid tremendous attention to the creation of public values though ICT policies. Due to the promising nature of e-governance, it appears that identifying the factors that would help facilitate public value of information technology is extremely important. The most important development of e-governance recently is Open Government Data, which provides citizens with the opportunity to access government data freely, conduct value-added applications, provide creative public services, and participate in different kinds of democratic processes. For the development of public value and electronic governance research and national comparison, the framework requires both subject and object data. In this paper, we first develop a public value e-governance evaluation framework and discuss whether open government data, an enabler of transparent, accountable, and effective public administration institutions, can really contribute to the evaluation of e-governance. With a thorough analysis on Taiwan Government open data, we find out that none of the government open data can really contribute to the evaluation of e-governance directly. Government should consider a more aggressive and goal-oriented strategy such as public value of e-governance or sustainable development strategy to open its data.

References

  1. C. Friedland and T. Gross (2010). "Measuring the public value of e-government: Methodology of a South African case stud," Proceedings of the 1st Africa 2010 Conference. IIMC International Information Management Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Y. Chu and H. L. Tseng (2016). "A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Government Open Data Platform," Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. 135--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. S. Martin, A. H. D. Rosario, and M. D. C. C. Perez, (2016). "An International Analysis of the Quality of Open Government Data Portals," Social Science Computer Review. 34(3), 298--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. B. Jørgensen and B. Bozeman (2007). "Public values an inventory," Administration & Society. 39(3), 354--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. H. Moore (1995). "Creating Public Value: Strategic Management, in Government," Boston, M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Di Maio (2003). "Value for Money Is Not Enough in Public Sector IT projects," Stamford, C.T.: Gartner Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Bai (2013). "A public value based framework for evaluating the performance of e-government in China," iBusiness. 5(3), 26--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. Castelnovo and M. Simonetta (2008). "A Public Value Evaluation of e-Government policies," Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. A. Golubeva (2007). "Evaluation of regional government portals on the basis of public value concept: Case study from Russian federation," Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Karunasena and H. Deng (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating the Public Value of e-Government: A Case Study from Sri Lanka. Proceedings of Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Melbourne.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Karunasena and H. Deng (2010). "Exploring the Public Value of e-Government: An Empirical Study from Sri Lanka," Proceedings of Bled eConference eTrust: Implications for the Individuals. Enterprises and Society, Bled.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Karunasena and H. Deng (2012). "Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka," Government Information Quarterly. 29(1), 76--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. N. Karkin and M. Janssen (2014). "Evaluating websites from a public value perspective: A review of Turkish local government websites," International Journal of Information Management. 34(3), 351--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. I. Kearns (2004). "Public Value and E-Government," London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Kostovski, M, Jovanovik, and D. Trajanov (2012). "Open Data Portal based on Semantic Web Technologies," Proceeding of the 7th South East European Doctoral Student Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. National Development Council (2015). "Outline of the Government Open Data Promotion Situation in Taiwan". Retrieved August 22, 2016, from http://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=8C362E80B990A55C&sms=1DB6C6A8871CA043&s=09819AC7E099BCD5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. National Development Council (2017). "Global Open Data Index Taiwan topped for two consecutive years," https://www.ndc.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=114AAE178CD95D4C&sms=DF717169EA26F1A3&s=9628F75B06CCA7DD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Y. Chu, W. L. Huang, T. Y. Huang, Y. T. Hung, C. P. Lee, and H. L. Tseng (2017). "Longitudinal Research of Public Value and Electronic Governance Development in Taiwan," Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. 459-464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Open Data Handbook (N/A). "Why Open Data?" Retrieved September 15, 2017, from http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/why-open-data/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Open Data in Support of E-governance Evaluation: A Public Value Framework

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      April 2018
      739 pages
      ISBN:9781450354219
      DOI:10.1145/3209415

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICEGOV '18 Paper Acceptance Rate104of184submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader