skip to main content
10.1145/3210240.3210345acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

LiquID: A Wireless Liquid IDentifier

Published:10 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper shows the feasibility of identifying liquids by shining ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless signals through them. The core opportunity arises from the fact that wireless signals experience distinct slow-down and attenuation when passing through a liquid, manifesting in the phase, strength, and propagation delay of the outgoing signal. While this intuition is simple, building a robust system entails numerous challenges, including (1) pico-second scale time of flight estimation, (2) coping with integer ambiguity due to phase wraps, (3) pollution from hardware noise and multipath, and (4) compensating for the liquid-container's impact on the measurements. We address these challenges through multiple stages of signal processing without relying on any feature extraction or machine learning. Instead, we model the behavior of radio signals inside liquids (using principles of physics), and estimate the liquid's permittivity, which in turn identifies the liquid. Experiments across 33 different liquids (spread over the whole permittivity spectrum) show median permittivity error of 9%. This implies that coke can be discriminated from diet coke or pepsi, whole milk from 2% milk, and distilled water from saline water. Our end system, LiquID, is cheap, non-invasive, and amenable to real-world applications.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p442-dhekne.webm

webm

104.5 MB

References

  1. 6 techniques for measuring dielectric properties. https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/books/9783110455403/9783110455403-007/9783110455403-007.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. AccuraUWB Flex Series. http://cdn.taoglas.com/datasheets/FXUWB20.01.0100C.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. DW1000-I-TR13 individual uwb chip pricing. https://www.digikey.com/short/j47cd1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. DW1000 IEEE802.15.4-2011 UWB Transceiver Datasheet. https://www.decawave.com/products/dw1000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. HP85070A Dielectric Probe Kit. https://literature.cdn.keysight.com/litweb/pdf/85070-90001.pdf?id = 1326230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Moving from trek1000 to a product. https://www.decawave.com/sites/default/files/aps016_moving_from_trek1000_to_a_product.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N5242a PNA-X Microwave Network Analyzer. https://literature.cdn.keysight.com/litweb/pdf/N5242-90007.pdf?id=1118335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. National instruments ni-tclk technology for timing and synchronization of modular instruments. http://www.ni.com/tutorial/3675/en/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Reflection and refraction. http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/optics421/modules/m1/reflection_and_refraction.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Adib, F., Kabelac, Z., Katabi, D., and Miller, R. C. 3d tracking via body radio reflections. In NSDI (2014), vol. 14, pp. 317--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Afsar, M. N., Birch, J. R., Clarke, R., and Chantry, G. The measurement of the properties of materials. Proceedings of the IEEE 74, 1 (1986), 183--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Alarifi, A., Al-Salman, A., Alsaleh, M., Alnafessah, A., Al-Hadhrami, S., Al-Ammar, M. A., and Al-Khalifa, H. S. Ultra wideband indoor positioning technologies: Analysis and recent advances. Sensors 16, 5 (2016), 707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Anderson, C. Determining the complex permittivity of materials with the Waveguide-Cutoff method. PhD thesis, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Baker-Jarvis, J., Vanzura, E. J., and Kissick, W. A. Improved technique for determining complex permittivity with the transmission/reflection method. IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques 38, 8 (1990), 1096--1103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Blattenberger, K. Dielectric Constant, Strength, and Loss Tangent.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, B., Dutta, P., Kempke, B., Kuo, Y.-S., and Pannuto, P. Decawave: Exploring state of the art commercial localization. Ann Arbor 1001 (2015), 48109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Courtney, C. C. Time-domain measurement of the electromagnetic properties of materials. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 46, 5 (1998), 517--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. DecaWave. Decawave. http://www.decawave.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M. The Feynman lectures on physics, Vol. I: The new millennium edition: mainly mechanics, radiation, and heat, vol. 1. Basic books, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gowda, M., Manweiler, J., Dhekne, A., Choudhury, R. R., and Weisz, J. D. Tracking drone orientation with multiple gps receivers. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (2016), ACM, pp. 280--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gregory, A. P., and Clarke, R. Tables of the complex permittivity of dielectric reference liquids at frequencies up to 5 GHz. National Physical Laboratory Teddington, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gutierrez, J. A., Callaway, E. H., and Barrett, R. IEEE 802.15.4 Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks: Enabling Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Standards Office, New York, NY, USA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hind, A. Agilent 101: An introduction to optical spectroscopy, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James, J. F., Sternberg, R. S., and Rice, S. A. The design of optical spectrometers. Physics Today 23 (1970), 55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jaturatussanai, P., Chamchoy, M., and Promwong, S. Characteristics of uwb propagation through building materials. In Communications and Information Technology, 2005. ISCIT 2005. IEEE International Symposium on (2005), vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 987--990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kaatze, U. Complex permittivity of water as a function of frequency and temperature. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 34, 4 (1989), 371--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Komarov, V., Wang, S., and Tang, J. Permittivity and measurements. Encyclopedia of RF and microwave engineering (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Levitas, B., Matuzas, J., Viswanath, G., Basalingappa, V., and Venkoparao, V. Uwb based oil quality detection. In Ultra-Wideband (ICUWB), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (2011), IEEE, pp. 220--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ma, Y., Hui, X., and Kan, E. C. 3d real-time indoor localization via broadband nonlinear backscatter in passive devices with centimeter precision. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (2016), ACM, pp. 216--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mao, W., He, J., and Qiu, L. Cat: high-precision acoustic motion tracking. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (2016), ACM, pp. 69--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mariakakis, A. T., Sen, S., Lee, J., and Kim, K.-H. Sail: Single access point-based indoor localization. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (2014), ACM, pp. 315--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Nandakumar, R., Iyer, V., Tan, D., and Gollakota, S. Fingerio: Using active sonar for fine-grained finger tracking. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), ACM, pp. 1515--1525. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Note, A. A. Agilent basics of measuring the dielectric properties of materials. Agilent Literature Number (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Rahman, T., Adams, A. T., Schein, P., Jain, A., Erickson, D., and Choudhury, T. Nutrilyzer: A mobile system for characterizing liquid food with photoacoustic effect. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM (2016), ACM, pp. 123--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Selmic, R. R., Mitra, A., Challa, S., and Simicevic, N. Ultra-wideband signal propagation experiments in liquid media. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 59, 1 (2010), 215--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. TAO, B. Understand the mobile graphics processing unit. http://www.embedded-computing.com/embedded-computing-design/understand-the-mobile-graphics-processing-unit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Von Hippel, A. R. Dielectrics and waves. Wiley, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, G., Qian, C., Han, J., Xi, W., Ding, H., Jiang, Z., and Zhao, J. Verifiable smart packaging with passive rfid. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2016), ACM, pp. 156--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Wang, J., Xiong, J., Chen, X., Jiang, H., Balan, R. K., and Fang, D. Tagscan: Simultaneous target imaging and material identification with commodity rfid devices. In Proc. ACM MobiCom (2017), pp. 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wei, T., and Zhang, X. Gyro in the air: tracking 3d orientation of batteryless internet-of-things. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (2016), ACM, pp. 55--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Yue, H., Virga, K. L., and Prince, J. L. Dielectric constant and loss tangent measurement using a stripline fixture. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology: Part B 21, 4 (1998), 441--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Yun, S., Chen, Y.-C., Zheng, H., Qiu, L., and Mao, W. Strata: Finegrained acoustic-based device-free tracking. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (2017), ACM, pp. 15--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. LiquID: A Wireless Liquid IDentifier

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiSys '18: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services
        June 2018
        560 pages
        ISBN:9781450357203
        DOI:10.1145/3210240

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate274of1,679submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader