skip to main content
10.1145/3210424.3210425acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Student Paper

6K Effective Resolution with 4K HEVC Decoding Capability for OMAF-compliant 360° Video Streaming

Published:12 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recent Omnidirectional MediA Format (OMAF) standard specifies delivery of 360° video content. OMAF supports only equirectangular (ERP) and cubemap projections and their region-wise packing with a limitation on video decoding capability to the maximum resolution of 4K (e.g., 4096x2048). Streaming of 4K ERP content allows only a limited viewport resolution, which is lower than the resolution of many current head-mounted displays (HMDs). In order to take the full advantage of those HMDs, this work proposes a specific mixed-resolution packing of 6K (6144x3072) ERP content and its realization in tile-based streaming, while complying with the 4K-decoding constraint and the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard. Experimental results indicate that, using Zonal-PSNR test methodology, the proposed layout decreases the streaming bitrate up to 32% in terms of BD-rate, when compared to mixed-quality viewport-adaptive streaming of 4K ERP as an alternative solution.

References

  1. Kammachi-Sreedhar K., Aminlou A., Hannuksela M. M., and Gabbouj M. 2016. Viewport-adaptive encoding and streaming of 360-degree video for virtual reality applications. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), pp. 583--586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lederer S. 2017. Today's and future challenges with new forms of content like 360°, AR, and VR. 2017. Invited talk in MPEG Workshop Global Media Technology Standards for an Immersive Age, Accessed Dec. 2017, from: http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/sites/default/files/events/06_Lederer.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Zare A., Aminlou A., and Hannuksela M. M. 2017. Virtual reality content streaming: viewport-dependent and tile-based techniques. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sánchez Y., Skupin R., and Schierl T. 2015. Compressed domain video processing for tile based panoramic streaming using HEVC. Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2244--2248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zare A., Aminlou A., Hannuksela M. M., and Gabbouj M. 2016. HEVC-compliant tile-based streaming of panoramic video for virtual reality applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference, pp. 601--605. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ghaznavi-Youvalari R. et al. 2017. Comparison of HEVC coding schemes for tile-based viewport-adaptive streaming of omnidirectional video. 2017 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), pp. 1--6. Luton, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi B., Wang Y., Hannuksela M. M., Lim Y., and Murtaza A. 2017. Text of ISO/IEC FDIS 23090-2 Omnidirectional Media Format, document: MPEG-M41922. Macau, China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mason W. 2016. VR HMD Roundup: Technical Specs. Accessed Apr. 2016, from http://uploadvr.com/vr-hmd-specs/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Aminlou A., Kammachi-Sreedhar K., Zare A., and Hannuksela M. M. 2016. Testing methodology for viewport-dependent encoding and streaming. ITU-T Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), document JVET-D0079. Chengdu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Podborski D., Thomas E., Hannuksela M. M., Oh S., Stockhammer T., and Pham S. 2017. Virtual Reality and DASH. International Broadcasting Convention (IBC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Information technology -- Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) -- Part 1: Media presentation description and segment formats (ISO/IEC 23009-1:2014). 2017. Accessed Dec. 2017, from: https://www.iso.org/standard/65274.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Auwera G. V. d., Coban M., and Mart H. 2016. Truncated Square Pyramid Projection (TSP) for 360 video. ITU-T Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), document: JVET-D0071. Chengdu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zare A., Aminlou A., and Hannuksela M. M. 2017. Requirements and proposed method for viewport-adaptive quality assessment. ITU-T Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), document: JVET-E0107. Geneva.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yu M., Lakshman H., and Girod B. 2015. A Framework to Evaluate Omnidirectional Video Coding Schemes. 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 31--36. Fukuoka. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Singla A., Fremerey S., Raake A., List P., and Feiten B. 2017. Measurement of User Exploration Behavior for Omnidirectional (360°) Videos with a Head Mounted Display. ITU-T Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), document: JVET-H0050. Macau, China, (Oct. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Boyce J., Alshina E., Abbas A., and Ye Y. 2016. JVET common test conditions and evaluation procedures for 360° video. ITU-T Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET), document: JVET-D1030, (Oct. 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bjøntegard G. 2001. Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves, document: VCEG-M33. Austin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 6K Effective Resolution with 4K HEVC Decoding Capability for OMAF-compliant 360° Video Streaming

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PV '18: Proceedings of the 23rd Packet Video Workshop
        June 2018
        89 pages
        ISBN:9781450357739
        DOI:10.1145/3210424

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate8of23submissions,35%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader