Abstract
Since its inception, Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) have been attracting much attention from both academia and industry. As for other wireless networking areas, scientific advancements are mainly due to the employment of simulation tools and mathematical models. After surveying 283 papers published in the last decade on vehicular networking, we pinpoint the main studied topics as well the most employed tools, pointing out the changes in research subject preference over the years. As a key contribution, we also evaluate to what extent the research community has evolved concerning the principles of credibility in simulation-based studies, such as repeatability and replicability, comparing our results with previous studies.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Auxiliary file (Survey_on_VANETs_publications_(2007_to_2017)_DATABASE.xlsx)
- 1 Nabeel Akhtar, Sinem Coleri Ergen, and Oznur Ozkasap. 2015. Vehicle mobility and communication channel models for realistic and efficient highway VANET simulation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 64, 1 (2015), 248–262.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 2 Maazen Alsabaan, Waleed Alasmary, Abdurhman Albasir, and Kshirasagar Naik. 2013. Vehicular Networks for a Greener Environment: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 15, 3 (2013), 1372–1388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3 Todd R Andel and Alec Yasinsac. 2006. On the credibility of manet simulations. Computer 39, 7 (2006), 48–54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Michael Behrisch, Laura Bieker, Jakob Erdmann, and Daniel Krajzewicz. 2011. SUMO–simulation of urban mobility: an overview. In Proceedings of SIMUL 2011, The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation. ThinkMind.Google Scholar
- 5 Mate Boban, Tiago TV Vinhoza, Michel Ferreira, Joao Barros, and Ozan K Tonguz. 2011. Impact of vehicles as obstacles in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE journal on selected areas in communications 29, 1 (2011), 15–28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 JiuJun Cheng, JunLu Cheng, MengChu Zhou, FuQiang Liu, ShangCe Gao, and Cong Liu. 2015. Routing in internet of vehicles: A review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 16, 5 (2015), 2339–2352.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 Christian Collberg and Todd A. Proebsting. 2016. Repeatability in Computer Systems Research. Commun. ACM 59, 3 (Feb. 2016), 62–69. 0001-0782 Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 Mario De Felice, Eduardo Cerqueira, Adalberto Melo, Mario Gerla, Francesca Cuomo, and Andrea Baiocchi. 2015. A distributed beaconless routing protocol for real-time video dissemination in multimedia VANETs. Computer Communications 58 (2015), 40–52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9 Mario Gerla and Leonard Kleinrock. 2011. Vehicular networks and the future of the mobile internet. Computer Networks 55, 2 (2011), 457–469. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Eugenio Giordano, Enzo De Sena, Giovanni Pau, and Mario Gerla. 2010a. Vergilius: A scenario generator for vanet. In Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2010-Spring), 2010 IEEE 71st. IEEE, 1–5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11 Eugenio Giordano, Raphael Frank, Giovanni Pau, and Mario Gerla. 2010b. CORNER: a realistic urban propagation model for VANET. In Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), 2010 Seventh International Conference on. IEEE, 57–60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12 Mordechai Haklay and Patrick Weber. 2008. Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 4 (2008), 12–18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13 Jérôme Härri, Fethi Filali, Christian Bonnet, and Marco Fiore. 2006. VanetMobiSim: generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks. ACM, 96–97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14 Thomas R Henderson, Mathieu Lacage, George F Riley, C Dowell, and J Kopena. 2008. Network simulations with the ns-3 simulator. SIGCOMM demonstration 14, 14 (2008), 527.Google Scholar
- 15 Feliz Kristianto Karnadi, Zhi Hai Mo, and Kun-chan Lan. 2007. Rapid generation of realistic mobility models for VANET. In Wireless communications and networking conference, 2007. WCNC 2007. IEEE. IEEE, 2506–2511. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16 David Kotz, Calvin Newport, Robert S Gray, Jason Liu, Yougu Yuan, and Chip Elliott. 2004. Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. ACM, 78–82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17 Stuart Kurkowski, Tracy Camp, and Michael Colagrosso. 2005. MANET simulation studies: the incredibles. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 9, 4 (2005), 50–61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18 Uichin Lee, Ryan Cheung, and Mario Gerla. 2009. Emerging vehicular applications. In Vehicular Networks: From Theory to Practice, Stephan Olariu and Michele C. Weigle (Eds.). Chapman and Hall/CRC", Chapter 6, 1–26.Google Scholar
- 19 Kumiko Maeda, Takaaki Umedu, Hirozumi Yamaguchi, Keiichi Yasumoto, and Teruo Higashino Higashino. 2006. MobiREAL: scenario generation and toolset for MANET simulation with realistic node mobility. In Mobile Data Management, 2006. MDM 2006. 7th International Conference on. IEEE, 55–55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20 Rahul Mangharam, Daniel Weller, Raj Rajkumar, Priyantha Mudalige, and Fan Bai. 2006. Groovenet: A hybrid simulator for vehicle-to-vehicle networks. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services, 2006 Third Annual International Conference on. IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 21 Francisco J Martinez, J-C Cano, Carlos T Calafate, and Pietro Manzoni. 2008. Citymob: a mobility model pattern generator for VANETs. In Communications Workshops, 2008. ICC Workshops' 08. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 370–374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 22 Francisco J Martinez, Chai Keong Toh, Juan-Carlos Cano, Carlos T Calafate, and Pietro Manzoni. 2011. A survey and comparative study of simulators for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 11, 7 (2011), 813–828. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23 Rupendra Nath Mitra and Dharma P Agrawal. 2015. 5G mobile technology: A survey. ICT Express 1, 3 (2015), 132–137.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 24 Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant, Frank Scholze, Roland Bertelmann, Maxi Kindling, Jens Klump, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker, Jens Gundlach, Peter Schirmbacher, and Uwe Dierolf. 2013. Making research data repositories visible: The re3data. org registry. PloS one 8, 11 (2013), e78080.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 25 Krzysztof Pawlikowski, H-DJ Jeong, and J-SR Lee. 2002. On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks. IEEE Communications magazine 40, 1 (2002), 132–139. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26 Michal Piorkowski, Maxim Raya, A Lezama Lugo, Panagiotis Papadimitratos, Matthias Grossglauser, and J-P Hubaux. 2008. TraNS: realistic joint traffic and network simulator for VANETs. ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 12, 1 (2008), 31–33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27 Nurul I Sarkar and Jairo A Gutiérrez. 2014. Revisiting the issue of the credibility of simulation studies in telecommunication networks: highlighting the results of a comprehensive survey of IEEE publications. IEEE Communications Magazine 52, 5 (2014), 218–224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 28 Christoph Sommer, Reinhard German, and Falko Dressler. 2011. Bidirectionally Coupled Network and Road Traffic Simulation for Improved IVC Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 10, 1 (January 2011), 3–15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 29 Adelinde M Uhrmacher, Sally Brailsford, Jason Liu, Markus Rabe, and Andreas Tolk. 2016. Panel - Reproducible research in discrete event simulation - A must or rather a maybe?. In Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2016. IEEE, 1301–1315. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 30 András Varga and Rudolf Hornig. 2008. An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Simulation tools and techniques for communications, networks and systems & workshops. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31 SY Wang, CL Chou, YH Chiu, YS Tzeng, MS Hsu, YW Cheng, WL Liu, and TW Ho. 2007. NCTUns 4.0: An integrated simulation platform for vehicular traffic, communication, and network researches. In Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. VTC-2007 Fall. 2007 IEEE 66th. IEEE, 2081–2085.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- VANETs' research over the past decade: overview, credibility, and trends
Recommendations
Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols in Urban VANETs
Ad-Hoc, Mobile, and Wireless NetworksAbstractInfrastructure-less communications between moving vehicles present emblematic challenges because of high node mobility and link volatility, which may harm the performances of different categories of emerging vehicular applications. In order to ...
Data communication in VANETs
VANETs have emerged as an exciting research and application area. Increasingly vehicles are being equipped with embedded sensors, processing and wireless communication capabilities. This has opened a myriad of possibilities for powerful and potential ...
Cross-layer Mobile Chord P2P protocol design for VANET
Efficient content distribution is one of the emerging applications in vehicular networks. To provide scalable content distribution in vehicular networks, Chord Peer-to-Peer (P2P) overlay could be applied. Most P2P protocols, including Chord, are designed ...
Comments