skip to main content
research-article

VANETs' research over the past decade: overview, credibility, and trends

Published:01 May 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Since its inception, Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) have been attracting much attention from both academia and industry. As for other wireless networking areas, scientific advancements are mainly due to the employment of simulation tools and mathematical models. After surveying 283 papers published in the last decade on vehicular networking, we pinpoint the main studied topics as well the most employed tools, pointing out the changes in research subject preference over the years. As a key contribution, we also evaluate to what extent the research community has evolved concerning the principles of credibility in simulation-based studies, such as repeatability and replicability, comparing our results with previous studies.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 1 Nabeel Akhtar, Sinem Coleri Ergen, and Oznur Ozkasap. 2015. Vehicle mobility and communication channel models for realistic and efficient highway VANET simulation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 64, 1 (2015), 248–262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2 Maazen Alsabaan, Waleed Alasmary, Abdurhman Albasir, and Kshirasagar Naik. 2013. Vehicular Networks for a Greener Environment: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 15, 3 (2013), 1372–1388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3 Todd R Andel and Alec Yasinsac. 2006. On the credibility of manet simulations. Computer 39, 7 (2006), 48–54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 Michael Behrisch, Laura Bieker, Jakob Erdmann, and Daniel Krajzewicz. 2011. SUMO–simulation of urban mobility: an overview. In Proceedings of SIMUL 2011, The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation. ThinkMind.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Mate Boban, Tiago TV Vinhoza, Michel Ferreira, Joao Barros, and Ozan K Tonguz. 2011. Impact of vehicles as obstacles in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE journal on selected areas in communications 29, 1 (2011), 15–28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 JiuJun Cheng, JunLu Cheng, MengChu Zhou, FuQiang Liu, ShangCe Gao, and Cong Liu. 2015. Routing in internet of vehicles: A review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 16, 5 (2015), 2339–2352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 Christian Collberg and Todd A. Proebsting. 2016. Repeatability in Computer Systems Research. Commun. ACM 59, 3 (Feb. 2016), 62–69. 0001-0782 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8 Mario De Felice, Eduardo Cerqueira, Adalberto Melo, Mario Gerla, Francesca Cuomo, and Andrea Baiocchi. 2015. A distributed beaconless routing protocol for real-time video dissemination in multimedia VANETs. Computer Communications 58 (2015), 40–52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Mario Gerla and Leonard Kleinrock. 2011. Vehicular networks and the future of the mobile internet. Computer Networks 55, 2 (2011), 457–469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Eugenio Giordano, Enzo De Sena, Giovanni Pau, and Mario Gerla. 2010a. Vergilius: A scenario generator for vanet. In Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2010-Spring), 2010 IEEE 71st. IEEE, 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11 Eugenio Giordano, Raphael Frank, Giovanni Pau, and Mario Gerla. 2010b. CORNER: a realistic urban propagation model for VANET. In Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), 2010 Seventh International Conference on. IEEE, 57–60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 Mordechai Haklay and Patrick Weber. 2008. Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 4 (2008), 12–18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 Jérôme Härri, Fethi Filali, Christian Bonnet, and Marco Fiore. 2006. VanetMobiSim: generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks. ACM, 96–97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14 Thomas R Henderson, Mathieu Lacage, George F Riley, C Dowell, and J Kopena. 2008. Network simulations with the ns-3 simulator. SIGCOMM demonstration 14, 14 (2008), 527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 Feliz Kristianto Karnadi, Zhi Hai Mo, and Kun-chan Lan. 2007. Rapid generation of realistic mobility models for VANET. In Wireless communications and networking conference, 2007. WCNC 2007. IEEE. IEEE, 2506–2511. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16 David Kotz, Calvin Newport, Robert S Gray, Jason Liu, Yougu Yuan, and Chip Elliott. 2004. Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. ACM, 78–82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17 Stuart Kurkowski, Tracy Camp, and Michael Colagrosso. 2005. MANET simulation studies: the incredibles. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 9, 4 (2005), 50–61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18 Uichin Lee, Ryan Cheung, and Mario Gerla. 2009. Emerging vehicular applications. In Vehicular Networks: From Theory to Practice, Stephan Olariu and Michele C. Weigle (Eds.). Chapman and Hall/CRC", Chapter 6, 1–26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 Kumiko Maeda, Takaaki Umedu, Hirozumi Yamaguchi, Keiichi Yasumoto, and Teruo Higashino Higashino. 2006. MobiREAL: scenario generation and toolset for MANET simulation with realistic node mobility. In Mobile Data Management, 2006. MDM 2006. 7th International Conference on. IEEE, 55–55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 Rahul Mangharam, Daniel Weller, Raj Rajkumar, Priyantha Mudalige, and Fan Bai. 2006. Groovenet: A hybrid simulator for vehicle-to-vehicle networks. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services, 2006 Third Annual International Conference on. IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21 Francisco J Martinez, J-C Cano, Carlos T Calafate, and Pietro Manzoni. 2008. Citymob: a mobility model pattern generator for VANETs. In Communications Workshops, 2008. ICC Workshops' 08. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 370–374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22 Francisco J Martinez, Chai Keong Toh, Juan-Carlos Cano, Carlos T Calafate, and Pietro Manzoni. 2011. A survey and comparative study of simulators for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 11, 7 (2011), 813–828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23 Rupendra Nath Mitra and Dharma P Agrawal. 2015. 5G mobile technology: A survey. ICT Express 1, 3 (2015), 132–137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. 24 Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant, Frank Scholze, Roland Bertelmann, Maxi Kindling, Jens Klump, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker, Jens Gundlach, Peter Schirmbacher, and Uwe Dierolf. 2013. Making research data repositories visible: The re3data. org registry. PloS one 8, 11 (2013), e78080.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25 Krzysztof Pawlikowski, H-DJ Jeong, and J-SR Lee. 2002. On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks. IEEE Communications magazine 40, 1 (2002), 132–139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26 Michal Piorkowski, Maxim Raya, A Lezama Lugo, Panagiotis Papadimitratos, Matthias Grossglauser, and J-P Hubaux. 2008. TraNS: realistic joint traffic and network simulator for VANETs. ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 12, 1 (2008), 31–33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27 Nurul I Sarkar and Jairo A Gutiérrez. 2014. Revisiting the issue of the credibility of simulation studies in telecommunication networks: highlighting the results of a comprehensive survey of IEEE publications. IEEE Communications Magazine 52, 5 (2014), 218–224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. 28 Christoph Sommer, Reinhard German, and Falko Dressler. 2011. Bidirectionally Coupled Network and Road Traffic Simulation for Improved IVC Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 10, 1 (January 2011), 3–15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29 Adelinde M Uhrmacher, Sally Brailsford, Jason Liu, Markus Rabe, and Andreas Tolk. 2016. Panel - Reproducible research in discrete event simulation - A must or rather a maybe?. In Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2016. IEEE, 1301–1315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30 András Varga and Rudolf Hornig. 2008. An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Simulation tools and techniques for communications, networks and systems & workshops. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31 SY Wang, CL Chou, YH Chiu, YS Tzeng, MS Hsu, YW Cheng, WL Liu, and TW Ho. 2007. NCTUns 4.0: An integrated simulation platform for vehicular traffic, communication, and network researches. In Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. VTC-2007 Fall. 2007 IEEE 66th. IEEE, 2081–2085.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. VANETs' research over the past decade: overview, credibility, and trends

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader