skip to main content
research-article

Discriminative and Orthogonal Subspace Constraints-Based Nonnegative Matrix Factorization

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) is one widely used feature extraction technology in the tasks of image clustering and image classification. For the former task, various unsupervised NMF methods based on the data distribution structure information have been proposed. While for the latter task, the label information of the dataset is one very important guiding. However, most previous proposed supervised NMF methods emphasis on imposing the discriminant constraints on the coefficient matrix. When dealing with new coming samples, the transpose or the pseudoinverse of the basis matrix is used to project these samples to the low dimension space. In this way, the label influence to the basis matrix is indirect. Although, there are also some methods trying to constrain the basis matrix in NMF framework, either they only restrict within-class samples or impose improper constraint on the basis matrix. To address these problems, in this article a novel NMF framework named discriminative and orthogonal subspace constraints-based nonnegative matrix factorization (DOSNMF) is proposed. In DOSNMF, the discriminative constraints are imposed on the projected subspace instead of the directly learned representation. In this manner, the discriminative information is directly connected with the projected subspace. At the same time, an orthogonal term is incorporated in DOSNMF to adjust the orthogonality of the learned basis matrix, which can ensure the orthogonality of the learned subspace and improve the sparseness of the basis matrix at the same time. This framework can be implemented in two ways. The first way is based on the manifold learning theory. In this way, two graphs, i.e., the intrinsic graph and the penalty graph, are constructed to capture the intra-class structure and the inter-class distinctness. With this design, both the manifold structure information and the discriminative information of the dataset are utilized. For convenience, we name this method as the name of the framework, i.e., DOSNMF. The second way is based on the Fisher’s criterion, we name it Fisher’s criterion-based DOSNMF (FDOSNMF). The objective functions of DOSNMF and FDOSNMF can be easily optimized using multiplicative update (MU) rules. The new methods are tested on five datasets and compared with several supervised and unsupervised variants of NMF. The experimental results reveal the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

References

  1. Shounan An, Jiho Yoo, and Seungjin Choi. 2011. Manifold-respecting discriminant nonnegative matrix factorization. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 32, 6 (2011), 832--837. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alain Baccini, Ph Besse, and A. Falguerolles. 1996. A L1-norm PCA and a heuristic approach. Ord. Symbol. Data Anal. 1, 1 (1996), 359--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. 2004. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Deng Cai, Xiaofei He, Jiawei Han, and Thomas S. Huang. 2011. Graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for data representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33 (2011), 1548--1560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yongsheng Dong, Dacheng Tao, and Xuelong Li. 2015a. Nonnegative multiresolution representation-based texture image classification. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 7, 1 (2015), 4:1--4:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yongsheng Dong, Dacheng Tao, Xuelong Li, Jinwen Ma, and Jiexin Pu. 2015b. Texture classification and retrieval using shearlets and linear regression. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 45, 3 (2015), 358--369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. David Donoho and Victoria Stodden. 2004. When does non-negative matrix factorization give a correct decomposition into parts? In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1141--1148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hongchang Gao, Feiping Nie, Weidong Cai, and Heng Huang. 2015. Robust capped norm nonnegative matrix factorization: Capped norm NMF. In Proceedings of ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 871--880. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Naiyang Guan, Tongliang Liu, Yangmuzi Zhang, Dacheng Tao, and Larry Steven Davis. 2017. Truncated cauchy non-negative matrix factorization for robust subspace learning. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Naiyang Guan, Dacheng Tao, Zhigang Luo, and Bo Yuan. 2011. Manifold regularized discriminative nonnegative matrix factorization with fast gradient descent. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 7 (2011), 2030--2048. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lihua Guo, Chenggang Guo, Lei Li, Qinghua Huang, Yanshan Li, and Xuelong Li. 2018. Two-stage local constrained sparse coding for fine-grained visual categorization. Sci. China Info. Sci. 61, 1 (2018), 018104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yuchen Guo, Guiguang Ding, Li Liu, Jungong Han, and Ling Shao. 2017. Learning to hash with optimized anchor embedding for scalable retrieval. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 3 (2017), 1344--1354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Patrik O. Hoyer. 2002. Non-negative sparse coding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop Neural Networks for Signal Processing. 557--565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jin Huang, Feiping Nie, Heng Huang, and Chris Ding. 2014. Robust manifold nonnegative matrix factorization. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 8, 3 (2014), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Aapo Hyvärinen, Juha Karhunen, and Erkki Oja. 2004. Independent Component Analysis. Vol. 46. John Wiley 8 Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alan Julian Izenman. 2013. Linear discriminant analysis. In Modern Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Springer, 237--280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ian Jolliffe. 2005. Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Online Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniel D. Lee and H. Sebastian Seung. 1999. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 6755 (1999), 788--791.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel D. Lee and H. Sebastian Seung. 2000. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 556--562.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Stan Z. Li, Xin Wen Hou, Hong Jiang Zhang, and Qian Sheng Cheng. 2001. Learning spatially localized, parts-based representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1. 1--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Xuelong Li, Guosheng Cui, and Yongsheng Dong. 2017a. Graph regularized non-negative low-rank matrix factorization for image clustering. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 47, 11 (2017), 3840--3853.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Xuelong Li, Guosheng Cui, and Yongsheng Dong. 2017b. Refined-graph regularization-based nonnegative matrix factorization. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 9, 1 (2017), 1:1--1:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Xuelong Li, Quanmao Lu, Yongsheng Dong, and Dacheng Tao. 2017. SCE: A manifold regularized set-covering method for data partitioning. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. PP, 99 (2017), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhao Li, Xindong Wu, and Hong Peng. 2010. Nonnegative matrix factorization on orthogonal subspace. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 31, 9 (2010), 905--911. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Haifeng Liu, Zhaohui Wu, Xuelong Li, Deng Cai, and Thomas S. Huang. 2012. Constrained nonnegative matrix factorization for image representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34, 7 (2012), 1299--1311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tongliang Liu, Mingming Gong, and Dacheng Tao. 2017. Large-cone nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 28, 9 (2017), 2129--2142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tongliang Liu and Dacheng Tao. 2016. On the performance of Manhattan nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 27, 9 (2016), 1851--1863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Xianzhong Long, Hongtao Lu, Yong Peng, and Wenbin Li. 2014. Graph regularized discriminative non-negative matrix factorization for face recognition. Multimedia Tools Appl. 72, 3 (2014), 2679--2699. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yuwu Lu, Zhihui Lai, Yong Xu, Xuelong Li, David Zhang, and Chun Yuan. 2017. Nonnegative discriminant matrix factorization. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 27, 7 (2017), 1392--1405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. John Makhoul, Salim Roucos, and Herbert Gish. 1985. Vector quantization in speech coding. In Proc. IEEE, Vol. 73. IEEE, 1551--1588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Feiping Nie, Rui Zhang, and Xuelong Li. 2017. A generalized power iteration method for solving quadratic problem on the stiefel manifold. Sci. China Info. Sci. 60, 11 (2017), 112101:1--112101:10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Weiya Ren, Guohui Li, Dan Tu, and Li Jia. 2014. Nonnegative matrix factorization with regularizations. IEEE J. Emerg. Select. Topics Circ. Syst. 4, 1 (2014), 153--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Dapeng Tao, Dacheng Tao, Xuelong Li, and Xinbo Gao. 2017. Large sparse cone non-negative matrix factorization for image annotation. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 8, 3 (2017), 37:1--37:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. George Trigeorgis, Konstantinos Bousmalis, Stefanos Zafeiriou, and Bjoern Schuller. 2014. A deep semi-NMF model for learning hidden representations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 1692--1700. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jing Wang, Feng Tian, Xiao Wang, H. C. Yu, Changhong Liu, and Liang Yang. 2017. Multi-component nonnegative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yanhui Xiao, Zhenfeng Zhu, Yao Zhao, Yunchao Wei, Shikui Wei, and Xuelong Li. 2014. Topographic NMF for data representation. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 44, 10 (2014), 1762--1771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Xing Xu, Li He, Huimin Lu, Atsushi Shimada, and Rin-Ichiro Taniguchi. 2017a. Non-linear matrix completion for social image tagging. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 6688--6696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Xing Xu, Fumin Shen, Yang Yang, Jie Shao, and Zi Huang. 2017b. Transductive visual-semantic embedding for zero-shot learning. In Proceedings of the ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. 41--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Xing Xu, Fumin Shen, Yang Yang, Dongxiang Zhang, Heng Tao Shen, and Jingkuan Song. 2017c. Matrix tri-factorization with manifold regularizations for zero-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3798--3807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jianchao Yang, Shuicheng Yang, Yun Fu, Xuelong Li, and Thomas Huang. 2008. Non-negative graph embedding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Chao Yao, Ya-Feng Liu, Bo Jiang, Jungong Han, and Junwei Han. 2017. LLE score: A new filter-based unsupervised feature selection method based on nonlinear manifold embedding and its application to image recognition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 11 (2017), 5257--5269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Chao Yao, Zhaoyang Lu, Jing Li, Yamei Xu, and Jungong Han. 2014. A subset method for improving linear discriminant analysis. Neurocomputing 138 (2014), 310--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Yuan Yuan, Xuelong Li, Yanwei Pang, Xin Lu, and Dacheng Tao. 2009. Binary sparse nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 19, 5 (2009), 772--777. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Stefanos Zafeiriou, Anastasios Tefas, Ioan Buciu, and Ioannis Pitas. 2006. Exploiting discriminant information in nonnegative matrix factorization with application to frontal face verification. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 17, 3 (2006), 683--695. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Xueyi Zhao, Xi Li, Zhongfei Zhang, Chunhua Shen, Yueting Zhuang, Lixin Gao, and Xuelong Li. 2016. Scalable linear visual feature learning via online parallel nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 27, 12 (2016), 2628--2642.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Ruicong Zhi, Markus Flierl, Qiuqi Ruan, and W. Bastiaan Kleijn. 2011. Graph-preserving sparse nonnegative matrix factorization with application to facial expression recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybernet., Part B (Cybernet.) 41, 1 (2011), 38--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Xiaofeng Zhu, Xuelong Li, and Shichao Zhang. 2016. Block-row sparse multiview multilabel learning for image classification. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 46, 2 (2016), 450--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Discriminative and Orthogonal Subspace Constraints-Based Nonnegative Matrix Factorization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
      ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 9, Issue 6
      Regular Papers
      November 2018
      290 pages
      ISSN:2157-6904
      EISSN:2157-6912
      DOI:10.1145/3289398
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 November 2018
      • Revised: 1 May 2018
      • Accepted: 1 May 2018
      • Received: 1 October 2017
      Published in tist Volume 9, Issue 6

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format