Walid Abu-Sufah
- [AbGK84] Abraham S., Gottlieb A. and Kruskal C. Simulating Shared Memory Parallel Computers. Proc. of the 15th Annual Pittsburgh Conf. on Modelling and Simulation, April, 1984.Google Scholar
- [AbPa82] Abu-Sufah W. and Padua D. Some Results on the Working Set Anomalies in Numerical Programs. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-8, No. 2, pp. 97-106, March, 1982.Google Scholar
- [AxDE83] Axelrod T., Dubois P. and Elgroth P. A Simulator for MIMD Performance Prediction: Application to the S-1 MKIIA multiprocessor. Proc. of the 10th Annual Int. Symp. on Computer Arch., pp. 350-358, 1983.Google Scholar
- [BrAl84] Browne J.C. and Almasi G. The Workshop on University/Industry/Government Collaboration on Research in Parallel Computing. ACM Operating Systems Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 15-27, July, 1984.Google Scholar
- [Chen83] Chen S. Large-Scale and High-Speed Multiprocessor System for Scientific Applications CRAY-X-MP-2 Series. Proc. of NATO Advanced Research Workshop on High Speed Computing, pp. 59-67, June, 1983.Google Scholar
- [ChDH84] Chen S., Dongarra J. and Hsiung C. Multiprocessing Linear Algorithms on the CRAY X-MP-2: Experience with Small Granularity. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, August, 1984.Google Scholar
- [Cytr84] Cytron R.G. "Compile-time Scheduling and Optimization for Multiprocessors", Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984.Google Scholar
- [DBMS79] Dongarra J., Bunch J., Moler C. and Stewart G. (eds.). Linpack User's Guide. SIAM Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1979.Google Scholar
- [Ferr78] Ferrari D. Computer Systems Performance Evaluation. Prentice-Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
- [GLYZ84] Gajski D., Lawrie D., Yew P., Zhu C., Kuck D., Emrath R., Cytron R., Kruskal C., Sameh A., Kamgnia E., Yang G. and Abu-Sufah W. "Transparency Copies, DOE Site Visit", Cedar Doc. No. 35, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept. of Computer Sci., Mar., 1984.Google Scholar
- [Gott80] Gottlieb A. "WASHCLOTH: The Logical Sucessor to Soapsuds", Ultracomputer Note #12, Courant Institute of Math. Sci., New York University, Dec., 1980.Google Scholar
- [GGKM83] Gottlieb A., Grishman R., McAuliffe L., Rudolph L. and Snir M. The NYU Ultracomputer - Designing an MIMD Shared-Memory Parallel Machine. IEEE Trans. on Computers, Vol. C-32, No. 2, pp. 175-189, Feb, 1983.Google Scholar
- [Jord84] Jordan H. Experience with Pipelined Multiple Instruction Streams. Proc. of the IEEE, Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 113-123, Jan., 1984.Google Scholar
- [Kuck77] Kuck D. A Survey of Parallel Machine organization and Programming. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 29-60, Mar., 1977. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [Kuck81] Kuck D. Automatic Program Restructuring for High-Speed Computation. In: Proc. of COMPAR81, Conf. on Analysing Problem-Classes and Programming for Parallel Computing, W. Handler, ed. Nurnberg, F.R. Germany, 1981. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [KLCS83] Kuck D., Lawrie D., Cytron R., Sameh A. and Gajski D. The Architecture and Programming of the Cedar System. Proc. of the 1983 LASL Workshop on Vector and Parallel Processing, Los Alamos, New Mexico, August, 1983.Google Scholar
- [KSCV84] Kuck D., Sameh A., Cytron R, Veidenbanm A., Polychronopoulos C., Lee G., MeDaniel T., Leasure B., Wolfe M., Beckman C., Davis J. and Kruskal C. The Effects of Program Restructuring, Algorithm Change, and Architecture Choice on Program Performance. Proc. of the 1984 Int'l. Conf. on Parallel Processing, pp. 129-138, Aug, 1984.Google Scholar
- [KuDa80] Kumar B. and Davidson E. Computer System Design Using a Hierarchical Approach to Performance Evaluation. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 511-521, Sep., 1980. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [KwAb84] Kwok A. and Abu-Sufah W. "Teedar: A Performance Evaluation Tool for Cedar", Cedar Doc. No. 34, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dept. of Computer Sci., March 9, 1984.Google Scholar
- [Lars84] Larson J. An Introduction to Multitasking on the Cray X-MP-2 Multiprocessor. IEEE Computer, Vol. 17, No., pp. 62-69, July 1984.Google Scholar
- [Lawr75] Lawrie D. Access and Alignment of Data in An Array Processor. IEEE Trans. Computer, Vol. C-24, pp. 1145-1155, Dec, 1975.Google Scholar
- [LeAK84] Lee K.Y., Abu-Sufah W. and Kuck D. On Modeling Performance Degradation Due to Data Movement in Vector Machines. Proc. of the 1984 Int'l. Conf. on Parallel Processing, pp. 269-277, Aug., 1984.Google Scholar
- [PaKL80] Padua D.A., Kuck D. and Lawrie D. High-Speed Multiprocessors and Compilation Techniques. IEEE Trans. Computers, Vol. C-29, No. 9, pp. 763- 776, Sept., 1980.Google Scholar
- [SUKC80] Setnowski M.C., Upchurch E.T., Kapur R.N., Charlu D.P.S. and Lipovski G.J. An Overview of the Texas Reconfigurable Array Computer. AFIPS Conf. Proc. NCC, pp. 631-641, 1980.Google Scholar
- [SBDG76] Smith B., Boyle J., Dongarra J., Garbow B., IKebe Y., Klema V. and Moler C. (eds.). Matrix Elgensystem Routines - Eispack Guide. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1976.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [Smit81] Smith B. Architecture and Applications of the HEP Multiprocessor Computer System. Real Time Processing IV, Proc. of SPIE, pp. 241-248, 1981.Google Scholar
- [VSSG84] Vrsalovic D., Siewiorek D., Segall Z. and Gehringer D. Performance Prediction for Multiprocessor Systems . Proc. of the 1984 Int. Conf. on Parallel Processing, pp. 139-146, August, 1984.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Performance prediction tools for Cedar: a multiprocessor supercomputer
Recommendations
Performance prediction tools for parallel discrete-event simulation
PADS '99: Proceedings of the thirteenth workshop on Parallel and distributed simulationWe have developed a set of performance prediction tools which help to estimate the achievable speedups from parallelizing a sequential simulation. The tools focus on two important factors in the actual speedup of a parallel simulation program : (a) the ...
The cedar system and an initial performance study
ISCA '93: Proceedings of the 20th annual international symposium on computer architectureIn this paper, we give an overview of the Cedar multiprocessor and present recent performance results. These include the performance of some computational kernels and the Perfect Benchmarks. We also present a methodology for judging parallel system ...
Comments