skip to main content
survey

Cloud Brokerage: A Systematic Survey

Published:28 January 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Background—The proliferation of cloud services has opened a space for cloud brokerage services. Brokers intermediate between cloud customers and providers to assist the customer in selecting the most suitable service, helping to manage the dimensionality, heterogeneity, and uncertainty associated with cloud services. Objective—Unlike other surveys, this survey focuses on the customer perspective. The survey systematically analyses the literature to identify and classify approaches to realise cloud brokerage, presenting an understanding of the state-of-the-art and a novel taxonomy to characterise cloud brokers. Method—A systematic literature survey was conducted to compile studies related to cloud brokerage and explore how cloud brokers are engineered. These studies are then analysed from multiple perspectives, such as motivation, functionality, engineering approach, and evaluation methodology. Results—The survey resulted in a knowledge base of current proposals for realising cloud brokers. The survey identified differences between the studies’ implementations, with engineering efforts directed at combinations of market-based solutions, middlewares, toolkits, algorithms, semantic frameworks, and conceptual frameworks. Conclusion—Our comprehensive meta-analysis shows that cloud brokerage is still a formative field. Although significant progress has been achieved in this field, considerable challenges remain to be addressed, which are also identified in this survey.

References

  1. Mohammad Aazam and Eui-Nam Huh. 2017. Cloud broker service-oriented resource management model. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 28, 2 (2017), e2937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Giuseppe Aceto, Alessio Botta, Walter de Donato, and Antonio Pescapé. 2013. Cloud monitoring: A survey. Computer Networks 57, 9 (2013), 2093--2115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yahya Al-Dhuraibi, Fawaz Paraiso, Nabil Djarallah, and Philippe Merle. 2018. Elasticity in cloud computing: State of the art and research challenges. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 11, 2 (March 2018), 430--447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bandar Aldawsari, Thar Baker, and David England. 2015. Towards a holistic multi-cloud brokerage system: Taxonomy, survey, and future directions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing. 1467--1472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tyanko Aleksiev, Simon Barkow-Oesterreicher, Peter Z. Kunszt, Sergio Maffioletti, Riccardo Murri, and Christian Panse. 2013. VM-MAD: A cloud/cluster software for service-oriented academic environments. CoRR abs/1302.2529 (2013). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.2529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alba Amato, Beniamino Di Martino, and Salvatore Venticinque. 2013. Cloud brokering as a service. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC). 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gaetano F. Anastasi, Emanuele Carlini, Massimo Coppola, and Patrizio Dazzi. 2017. QoS-aware genetic cloud brokering. Future Generation Computer Systems 75 (2017), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bernady Apduhan, Muhammad Younas, and Toshihiro Uchibayashi. 2015. Improving Reliability and Availability of IaaS Services in Hybrid Clouds. Springer International Publishing, 557--568.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. AppDirect. 2017. AppDirect SMB Cloud Service Adoption Report. Retrieved from https://dcnxfkgt2gjxz.cloudfront.net/Files/AppDirect-SMB-Survey-Report-2017.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michael Armbrust, Armando Fox, Rean Griffith, Anthony D. Joseph, Randy Katz, Andy Konwinski, Gunho Lee, David Patterson, Ariel Rabkin, Ion Stoica, and Matei Zaharia. 2010. A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM 53, 4 (April 2010), 50--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Marcio Miranda Assis and Luiz Fernando Bittencourt. 2016. A survey on cloud federation architectures: Identifying functional and non-functional properties. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 72 (2016), 51--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Adam Barker, Blesson Varghese, and Long Thai. 2015. Cloud services brokerage: A survey and research roadmap. CoRR abs/1506.00485 (2015). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00485. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Adam Barker, Blesson Varghese, Jonathan Stuart Ward, and Ian Sommerville. 2014. Academic cloud computing research: Five pitfalls and five opportunities. In Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud 14). USENIX Association. https://www.usenix.org/conference/hotcloud14/workshop-program/presentation/barker. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rodrigo N. Calheiros, Rajiv Ranjan, Anton Beloglazov, César A. F. De Rose, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2011. CloudSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software: Practice and Experience 41, 1 (Jan. 2011), 23--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rodrigo N. Calheiros, Adel Nadjaran Toosi, Christian Vecchiola, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2012. A coordinator for scaling elastic applications across multiple clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems 28, 8 (2012), 1350--1362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sergei Chichin, Mohan Baruwal Chhetri, Quoc Bao Vo, Ryszard Kowalczyk, and Marcin Stepniak. 2014. Smart cloud marketplace—Agent-based platform for trading cloud services. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), Vol. 3. 388--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Georgiana Copil, Daniel Moldovan, Hong-Linh Truong, and Schahram Dustdar. 2014. On controlling cloud services elasticity in heterogeneous clouds. In Proceedings of the Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC). 573--578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Cloud Standards Coordination (CSC). 2016. CSC Phase 2: Cloud Computing Users Needs—Analysis, Conclusions and Recommendations from a Public Survey. Special Report 003 381 V2.1.1. The European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). 12--19 pages. Retrieved from http://csc.etsi.org/phase2/UserNeeds.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Amir Vahid Dastjerdi, Sayed Gholam Hassan Tabatabaei, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2010. An effective architecture for automated appliance management system applying ontology-based cloud discovery. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing. 104--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ruben Van den Bossche, Kurt Vanmechelen, and Jan Broeckhove. 2013. Online cost-efficient scheduling of deadline-constrained workloads on hybrid clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems 29, 4 (2013), 973--985. Special Section: Utility and Cloud Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tom Desair, Wouter Joosen, Bert Lagaisse, Ansar Rafique, and Stefan Walraven. 2013. Policy-driven middleware for heterogeneous, hybrid cloud platforms. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Adaptive and Reflective Middleware (ARM). ACM, New York, NY, Article 2, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mona Eisa, Muhammad Younas, Kashinath Basu, and Hong Zhu. 2016. Trends and directions in cloud service selection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE). 423--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yehia Elkhatib. 2016. Mapping cross-cloud systems: Challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing. USENIX Association, 77--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yehia Elkhatib, Gordon S. Blair, and Bholanathsingh Surajbali. 2013. Experiences of using a hybrid cloud to construct an environmental virtual observatory. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cloud Data and Platforms. 13--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yehia Elkhatib, Faiza Samreen, and Gordon S. Blair. 2018. Same same, but different: A descriptive differentiation of intra-cloud IaaS services. CoRR abs/1802.03641 (2018). arxiv:1802.03641 http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ana Juan Ferrer, Francisco Hernández, Johan Tordsson, Erik Elmroth, Ahmed Ali-Eldin, Csilla Zsigri, Raül Sirvent, Jordi Guitart, Rosa M. Badia, Karim Djemame, Wolfgang Ziegler, Theo Dimitrakos, Srijith K. Nair, George Kousiouris, Kleopatra Konstanteli, Theodora Varvarigou, Benoit Hudzia, Alexander Kipp, Stefan Wesner, Marcelo Corrales, Nikolaus Forgó, Tabassum Sharif, and Craig Sheridan. 2012. OPTIMIS: A holistic approach to cloud service provisioning. Future Generation Computer Systems 28, 1 (Jan. 2012), 66--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nadir Ghrada, Mohamed Faten Zhani, and Yehia Elkhatib. 2018. Price and performance of cloud-hosted virtual network functions: Analysis and future challenges. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Approaches, Analyses, and Performance Issues in Virtualized Environments and Software Defined Networking (PVE-SDN).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Nikolay Grozev and Rajkumar Buyya. 2014. Inter-cloud architectures and application brokering: Taxonomy and survey. Software: Practice and Experience 44, 3 (2014), 369--390. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/spe.2168 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pei-Fang Hsu, Soumya Ray, and Yu-Yu Li-Hsieh. 2014. Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism, and deployment model. International Journal of Information Management 34, 4 (2014), 474--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Iliana Iankoulova and Maia Daneva. 2012. Cloud computing security requirements: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Wassim Itani, Cesar Ghali, Ramzi Bassil, Ayman Kayssi, and Ali Chehab. 2012. BGP-inspired autonomic service routing for the cloud. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC). ACM, New York, NY, 406--411. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Pooyan Jamshidi, Aakash Ahmad, and Claus Pahl. 2013. Cloud migration research: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing 1, 2 (July 2013), 142--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Bahman Javadi, Jemal Abawajy, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2012. Failure-aware resource provisioning for hybrid Cloud infrastructure. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 72, 10 (Oct. 2012), 1318--1331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Barkha Javed, Peter Bloodsworth, Raihan Ur Rasool, Kamran Munir, and Omer Rana. 2016. Cloud market maker: An automated dynamic pricing marketplace for cloud users. Future Generation Computer Systems 54 (2016), 52--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Sam Johnston. 2014. Simple workload 8 application portability (SWAP). In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on CrossCloud Systems. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Foued Jrad, Jie Tao, and Achim Streit. 2013. A broker-based framework for multi-cloud workflows. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multi-cloud Applications and Federated Clouds (MultiCloud). ACM, New York, NY, 61--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Amin Jula, Elankovan Sundararajan, and Zalinda Othman. 2014. Cloud computing service composition: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 41, 8 (2014), 3809--3824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kiranbir Kaur, Sandeep Sharma, and Karanjeet Singh Kahlon. 2017. Interoperability and portability approaches in inter-connected clouds: A review. Computing Surveys 50, 4, Article 49 (Oct. 2017), 1--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Attila Kertész, Gabor Kecskemeti, and Ivona Brandic. 2014. An interoperable and self-adaptive approach for SLA-based service virtualization in heterogeneous cloud environments. Future Generation Computer Systems 32 (2014), 54--68. Special Section: The Management of Cloud Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ali Khajeh-Hosseini, David Greenwood, James W. Smith, and Ian Sommerville. 2012. The cloud adoption toolkit: Supporting cloud adoption decisions in the enterprise. Software: Practice and Experience 42, 4 (2012), 447--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Ali Khajeh-Hosseini, Ian Sommerville, Jurgen Bogaerts, and Pradeep Teregowda. 2011. Decision support tools for cloud migration in the enterprise. In Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing. 541--548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Woo-Joong Kim, Dong-Ki Kang, Seong-Hwan Kim, and Chan-Hyun Youn. 2015. Cost adaptive VM management for scientific workflow application in mobile cloud. Mobile Networks and Applications 20, 3 (2015), 328--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Barbara Kitchenham. 2004. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Technical Report TR/SE-0401. Keele University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jason Lango. 2013. Toward software-defined SLAs. Queue 11, 11, Article 20 (Nov. 2013), 20:20--20:31 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Neal Leavitt. 2009. Is cloud computing really ready for prime time? Computer 42, 1 (Jan. 2009), 15--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ang Li, Xiaowei Yang, Srikanth Kandula, and Ming Zhang. 2010. CloudCmp: Comparing public cloud providers. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement (IMC’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Ang Li, Xuanran Zong, Srikanth Kandula, Xiaowei Yang, and Ming Zhang. 2011. CloudProphet: Towards application performance prediction in cloud. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM’11). ACM, New York, NY, 426--427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Nikos Loutas, Eleni Kamateri, Filippo Bosi, and Konstantinos A. Tarabanis. 2011. Cloud computing interoperability: The state of play. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom). 752--757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jose Luis Lucas-Simarro, Rafael Moreno-Vozmediano, Ruben S. Montero, and Ignacio M. Llorente. 2011. Dynamic placement of virtual machines for cost optimization in multi-cloud environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS). 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Jose Luis Lucas-Simarro, Rafael Moreno-Vozmediano, Ruben S. Montero, and Ignacio M. Llorente. 2015. Cost optimization of virtual infrastructures in dynamic multi-cloud scenarios. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 27, 9 (2015), 2260--2277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Sunilkumar S. Manvi and Gopal Krishna Shyam. 2014. Resource management for infrastructure as a service (IaaS) in cloud computing: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 41 (2014), 424--440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Rajat Mehrotra, Srishti Srivastava, Ioana Banicescu, and Sherif Abdelwahed. 2016. Towards an autonomic performance management approach for a cloud broker environment using a decomposition-coordination based methodology. Future Generation Computer Systems 54 (2016), 195--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Étienne Michon, Julien Gossa, Stéphane Genaud, Léo Unbekandt, and Vincent Kherbache. 2017. Schlouder: A broker for IaaS clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems 69 (2017), 11--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Victor Ion Munteanu, Călin Şandru, and Dana Petcu. 2014. Multi-cloud resource management: Cloud service interfacing. Journal of Cloud Computing 3, 1 (2014), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Srijith K. Nair, Sakshi Porwal, Theo Dimitrakos, Ana Juan Ferrer, Johan Tordsson, Tabassum Sharif, Craig Sheridan, Muttukrishnan Rajarajan, and Afnan Ullah Khan. 2010. Towards secure cloud bursting, brokerage and aggregation. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE European Conference on Web Services. 189--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Fawaz Paraiso, Philippe Merle, and Lionel Seinturier. 2014. soCloud: A service-oriented component-based PaaS for managing portability, provisioning, elasticity, and high availability across multiple clouds. CoRR abs/1407.1963 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Ahmed Patel, Mona Taghavi, Kaveh Bakhtiyari, and Joaquim Celestino Júnior. 2013. An intrusion detection and prevention system in cloud computing: A systematic review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 36, 1 (2013), 25--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Ioannis Patiniotakis, Yiannis Verginadis, and Gregoris Mentzas. 2014. Preference-based cloud service recommendation as a brokerage service. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on CrossCloud Systems (CCB). ACM, New York, NY, Article 5, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Przemyslaw Pawluk, Bradley Simmons, Michael Smit, Marin Litoiu, and Serge Mankovski. 2012. Introducing STRATOS: A cloud broker service. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 891--898. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Alfonso Quarati, Andrea Clematis, and Daniele D’Agostino. 2016. Delivering cloud services with QoS requirements: Business opportunities, architectural solutions and energy-saving aspects. Future Generation Computer Systems 55 (2016), 403--427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Faiza Samreen, Yehia Elkhatib, Matthew Rowe, and Gordon S. Blair. 2016. Daleel: Simplifying cloud instance selection using machine learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. 557--563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Benjamin Satzger, Waldemar Hummer, Christian Inzinger, Philipp Leitner, and Schahram Dustdar. 2013. Winds of change: From vendor lock-in to the meta cloud. IEEE Internet Computing 17, 1 (Jan. 2013), 69--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Prateek Sharma, Lucas Chaufournier, Prashant Shenoy, and Y. C. Tay. 2016. Containers and virtual machines at scale: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 17th International Middleware Conference (Middleware’16). ACM, New York, NY, Article 1, 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Prateek Sharma, Stephen Lee, Tian Guo, David Irwin, and Prashant Shenoy. 2015. SpotCheck: Designing a derivative IaaS cloud on the spot market. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys’15). ACM, Article 16, 15 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Fereshteh Sheikh and Nima Jafari Navimipour. 2018. Auction-based resource allocation mechanisms in the cloud environments: A review of the literature and reflection on future challenges. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 30, 16 (2018), e4456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Thamarai Selvi Somasundaram, Kannan Govindarajan, Usha Kiruthika, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2014. Semantic-enabled CARE resource broker (SeCRB) for managing grid and cloud environment. The Journal of Supercomputing 68, 2 (2014), 509--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Le Sun, Hai Dong, Farookh Khadeer Hussain, Omar Khadeer Hussain, and Elizabeth Chang. 2014. Cloud service selection: State-of-the-art and future research directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 45 (2014), 134--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Johan Tordsson, Rubén S. Montero, Rafael Moreno-Vozmediano, and Ignacio M. Llorente. 2012. Cloud brokering mechanisms for optimized placement of virtual machines across multiple providers. Future Generation Computer Systems 28, 2 (2012), 358--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Blesson Varghese, Lawan Thamsuhang Subba, Long Thai, and Adam Barker. 2016. Container-based cloud virtual machine benchmarking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E). 192--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Denis Weerasiri, Boualem Benatallah, and Moshe Chai Barukh. 2015. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA). Springer International Publishing, 334--350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Xiaoyu Yang, Bassem Nasser, Mike Surridge, and Stuart Middleton. 2012. A business-oriented cloud federation model for real-time applications. Future Generation Computer Systems 28, 8 (Oct. 2012), 1158--1167. Including Special sections SS: Trusting Software Behavior and SS: Economics of Computing Services. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Sami Yangui, Iain-James Marshall, Jean-Pierre Laisne, and Samir Tata. 2014. CompatibleOne: The open source cloud broker. Journal of Grid Computing 12, 1 (2014), 93--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Zhi-Hui Zhan, Xiao-Fang Liu, Yue-Jiao Gong, Jun Zhang, Henry Shu-Hung Chung, and Yun Li. 2015. Cloud computing resource scheduling and a survey of its evolutionary approaches. Comput. Surveys 47, 4, Article 63 (July 2015), 63:1--63:33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Qi Zhang, Lu Cheng, and Raouf Boutaba. 2010. Cloud computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications 1, 1 (2010), 7--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Zhizhong Zhang, Chuan Wu, and David W. L. Cheung. 2013. A survey on cloud interoperability: Taxonomies, standards, and practice. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 40, 4 (April 2013), 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Cloud Brokerage: A Systematic Survey

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Computing Surveys
            ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 51, Issue 6
            November 2019
            786 pages
            ISSN:0360-0300
            EISSN:1557-7341
            DOI:10.1145/3303862
            • Editor:
            • Sartaj Sahni
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 January 2019
            • Revised: 1 August 2018
            • Accepted: 1 August 2018
            • Received: 1 May 2018
            Published in csur Volume 51, Issue 6

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • survey
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format