skip to main content
10.1145/3282894.3282899acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Persuasive design of a mobile coaching app to encourage a healthy lifestyle during menopause

Published:25 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The menopause transition is associated with physiological changes that increase women's cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Healthier and more conscious behavior in specific areas (diet, physical activity, smoking, etc.) can mitigate this risk. However, in order to modify such behavior, women must be aware of the need to use endogenous and exogenous strategies to improve their lifestyle habits. Despite the explosion of health-related apps, there are currently no innovative examples addressing a self-care approach to menopause by applying personalization, adaptability, and persuasion to induce women to improve their health-related lifestyle. Therefore, this paper describes the theoretical foundations and design phases of a system that coaches women to improve their lifestyle during menopause. To this end, we used a Participatory Design approach involving different groups of women along the different design phases to define the system's user interfaces and interaction mechanisms.

References

  1. N.E. Avis, A. Colvin, J.T. Bromberger, R. Hess, K. A. Matthews, M. Ory, and M. Schocken. 2009. Change in health-related quality of life over the menopausal transition in a multiethnic cohort of middle-aged women: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause (New York, NY) 16, 5 (2009), 860.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J.T. Cacioppo, R.E. Petty, C.F. Kao, and R. Rodriguez. 1986. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of personality and social psychology 51, 5 (1986), 1032.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Robert B. Cialdini. 1988. Influence - Science and Practice. HarperCollins Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Robert B. Cialdini. 2007. Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Collins New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alan Cooper and others. 2004. The inmates are running the asylum:{Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity}. Sams Indianapolis. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Cugelman. 2013. Gamification: what it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games 1, 1 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. B. Cugelman, M. Thelwall, and P. Dawes. 2011. Online interventions for social marketing health behavior change campaigns: a meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors. Journal of medical Internet research 13, 1 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. J. Czaja, N. Charness, A.D. Fisk, C. Hertzog, S.N. Nair, W.A. Rogers, and J. Sharit. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and aging 21, 2 (2006), 333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Z. Deng, X. Mo, and S. Liu. 2014. Comparison of the middle-aged and older users' adoption of mobile health services in China. International journal of medical informatics 83, 3 (2014), 210--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R.H. Eckel, J. M. Jakicic, J. D. Ard, J.M. De Jesus, N. H. Miller, V.S. Hubbard, I. Lee, A.H. Lichtenstein, C. M. Loria, B. E. Millen, and others. 2014. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63, 25 Part B (2014), 2960--2984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Norman Nielsen Group. 2012. Thinking Aloud: The #1 Usability Tool. (2012). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jonathan Grudin and John Pruitt. 2002. Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In PDC. 144--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirsi Halttu, Michael Oduor, Piiastiina Tikka, and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2015. About the Persuasion Context for BCSSs: Analyzing the Contextual Factors.. In BCSS@PERSUASIVE. 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Rollnick N. Heather, R. Gold, and W. Hall. 1992. Development of a short 'readiness to change' questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. Addiction 87, 5 (1992), 743--754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Andreas Holzinger, Gig Searle, and Alexander Nischelwitzer. 2007. On some aspects of improving mobile applications for the elderly. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 923--932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kai Huotari and Juho Hamari. 2012. Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective. In Proceeding of the 16th international academic MindTrek conference. ACM, 17--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Johnson, S. Deterding, K. Kuhn, A. Staneva, S. Stoyanov, and L. Hides. 2016. Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions 6 (2016), 89--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sitwat Langrial, Agnis Stibe, and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2013. Practical Examples of Mobile and Social Apps using the Outcome/Change Design Matrix.. In PERSUASIVE (Adjunct Proceedings). 7--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mirim Lee, Bon chang Koo, Hee seok Jeong, Joongsin Park, Juhee Cho, and Jun dong Cho. 2015. Understanding Women's Needs in Menopause for Development of mHealth. In Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Pervasive Wireless Healthcare. ACM, 51--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. LeRouge, J. Ma, S. Sneha, and K. Tolle. 2013. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. International journal of medical informatics 82, 11 (2013), e251--e268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. H. Lichtenstein, L.J. Appel, M. Brands, M. Carnethon, S. Daniels, H.A. Franch, K.E. Penny B. Franklin, Barry and, W.S. Harris, B. Howard, and others. 2006. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation 114, 1 (2006), 82--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J.E. Manson, J.M. Ames, M. Shapiro, S. Margery M.L. Gass, J. L. Shifren, C.A. Stuenkel, J.V. Pinkerton, A.M. Kaunitz, D.T. Pace, Risa R. Kagan, and others. 2015. Algorithm and mobile app for menopausal symptom management and hormonal/non-hormonal therapy decision making: a clinical decision-support tool from The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 22, 3 (2015), 247--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. G.R. Miller. 1980. On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. (1980).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. M.J. Muller and Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (1993), 24--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. I. Nahum-Shani, and A. Tewari S. N. Smith, K. Witkiewitz, L.M. Collins, B. Spring, and S. Murphy. 2014. Just in time adaptive interventions (jitais): An organizing framework for ongoing health behavior support. Methodology Center technical report 2014 (2014), 14--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Janni Nielsen, Torkil Clemmensen, and Carsten Yssing. 2002. Getting access to what goes on in people's heads?: reflections on the think-aloud technique. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. ACM, 101--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 249--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. L. Nielsen, K.S. Hansen, J. Stage, and J. Billestrup. 2015. A template for design personas: analysis of 47 persona descriptions from danish industries and organizations. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD) 7, 1 (2015), 45--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M Oduor, T Alahäivälä, and H Oinas-Kukkonen. 2017. Software Design Patterns for Persuasive Computer--Human Dialogue: Reminder, Reward, and Instant Feedback. In Behavior Change Research and Theory. Elsevier, 47--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. H. Oinas-Kukkonen. 2013. A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems. Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, 6 (2013), 1223--1235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. H. Oinas-Kukkonen and M. Harjumaa. 2009. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 1 (2009), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. William Poundstone. 2010. Priceless: The myth of fair value (and how to take advantage of it). Hill and Wang.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. H. Von Restorff. 1933. Über die wirkung von bereichsbildungen im spurenfeld. Psychologische Forschung 18, 1 (1933), 299--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Morris Rosenberg. 1965. Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures package 61 (1965), 52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Marco De Sá and Luís Carriço. 2009. A mobile tool for in-situ prototyping. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. M. Sherer, J.E. Maddux, B.Mercandante, S. Prentice-Dunn, B. Jacobs, and R.W. Rogers. 1982. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports 51, 2 (1982), 663--671.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. B. Still and J. Morris. 2010. The blank-page technique: Reinvigorating paper prototyping in usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 53, 2 (2010), 144--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Victor Strecher. 2007. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 3 (2007), 53--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Alan R Tall. 2002. Exercise to reduce cardiovascular risk-how much is enough? (2002).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Amaury Trujillo and Maria Claudia Buzzi. 2016. Participatory User Requirements Elicitation for Personal Menopause App. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, 102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Amaury Trujillo, Caterina Senette, and Maria Claudia Buzzi. 2018. Persona Design for Just-in-Time Adaptive and Persuasive Interfaces in Menopause Self-care. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability. Springer, 94--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Persuasive design of a mobile coaching app to encourage a healthy lifestyle during menopause

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MUM '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
          November 2018
          548 pages
          ISBN:9781450365949
          DOI:10.1145/3282894

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 November 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          MUM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of82submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader