ABSTRACT
Conventional hearing aids frame hearing impairment almost exclusively as a problem. In the present paper, we took an alternative approach by focusing on positive future possibilities of 'divergent hearing'. To this end, we developed a method to speculate simultaneously about not-yet-experienced positive meanings and not-yet-existing technology. First, we gathered already existing activities in which divergent hearing was experienced as an advantage rather than as a burden. These activities were then condensed into 'Prompts of Positive Possibilities' (PPP), such as 'Creating a shelter to feel safe in". In performative sessions, participants were given these PPPs and 'Open Probes' to enact novel everyday activities. This led to 26 possible meanings and according devices, such as "Being able to listen back into the past with a rewinder". The paper provides valuable insights into the interests and expectations of people with divergent hearing as well as a methodological contribution to a possibility-driven design.
- Günther Anders. 2002. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen II: Über die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution. C.H.Beck Verlag, München.Google Scholar
- Karen Barad. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Duke University Press, Durham, London.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative HCI research: Going behind the scenes. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 9, 1: 1--115. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eva Brandt and Camilla Grunnet. 2000. Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference PDC 2000, 11--20. Retrieved from http://www.itu.dk/courses/I/F2004/PDC00-drama-endelig.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Citation Briggs, Pam Briggs, Mark Blythe, John Vines, Stephen Lindsay, Paul Dunphy, and James Nicholson. 2012. Invisible Design?: Exploring Insights and Ideas through Ambiguous Film Scenarios.Google Scholar
- Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience prototyping. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS '00: 424-- 433. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pieter Desmet and Marc Hassenzahl. 2012. Towards Happiness: Possibility-Driven Design. In Human-computer interaction: The agency perspective, Marielba Zacarias and José Valente de Oliveira (eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3--27.Google Scholar
- Pma Desmet and Ae Pohlmeyer. 2013. Positive design: An introduction to design for subjective well-being. International Journal of Design 7, 3: 5--19.Google Scholar
- Sarah Diefenbach and Marc Hassenzahl. 2017. Psychologie in der nutzerzentrierten Produktgestaltung: Mensch-Technik-InteraktionErlebnis. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Sarah Diefenbach, Marc Hassenzahl, Kai Eckoldt, Lena Hartung, Eva Lenz, and Matthias Laschke. 2016. Designing for well-being: A case study of keeping small secrets. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12, 2: 151--158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fiona Dunne, Anthony; Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction and Social Dreaming. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann. 2011. Introduction. In Hearing Aids Communication: Integrating Social Interaction, Audiology and User Centered Design to Improve Communication with Hearing Loss and Hearing Technologies, Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann (eds.). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim, 1--8.Google Scholar
- Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann. 2011. Introduction to conversation analysis with examples from audiology. In Hearing Aids Communication, Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann (eds.). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim, 40--47.Google Scholar
- Maria Egbert and Ben Matthews. 2011. User centered design: From understanding hearing loss and hearing aids towards understanding interaction. In Hearing Aids Communication, Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann (eds.). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim, 48--55.Google Scholar
- Chris Elsden, David Chatting, Abigail C. Durrant, Andrew Garbett, Bettina Nissen, John Vines, and David S. Kirk. 2017. On Speculative Enactments. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17: 5386--5399. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sigmund Freud. Civilization and its Discontents. Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
- Arnold Gehlen. 1988. Man, his nature and place in the world. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Simone Groeber and Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2011. Hearingimpaired adolescents in a regular classroom: On the embodied accomplishment of participation and understanding. In Hearing Aids Communication, Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann (eds.). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim, 76--89.Google Scholar
- Karin Harrasser. 2013. Körper 2.0. transcript, Bielefeld.Google Scholar
- Marc Hassenzahl, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, Matthias Laschke, Eva Lenz, and Joonhwan Kim. 2013. Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness. International Journal of Design 7, 3: 21--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erich Hörl. 2010. Die künstliche Intelligenz des Sinns. Sinngeschichte und Technologie im Anschluss an Jean-Luc Nancy. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung 1, 2: 129--147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hilary Hutchinson, et. al. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 5: 17--24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giulio Iacucci and Kari Kuutti. 2002. Everyday life as a stage in creating and performing scenarios for wireless devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 4: 299--306. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Don Ihde. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
- Benjamin Johansen, Yannis Paul Raymond Flet-Berliac, Maciej Jan Korzepa, Per Sandholm, Niels Henrik Pontoppidan, Michael Kai Petersen, and Jakob Eg Larsen. 2017. Hearables in Hearing Care: Discovering Usage Patterns Through IoT Devices. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Human and Technological Environments, 39--49.Google Scholar
- Benjamin Johansen, Michael Kai Petersen, Niels Henrik Pontoppidan, Per Sandholm, and Jakob Eg Larsen. 2017. Rethinking Hearing Aid Fitting by Learning From Behavioral Patterns. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '17: 1733--1739. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth Keating and Pirkko Raudaskoski. 2011. Theoretical Framework: Communicative technology for augmented interaction within the field of Science, Technology and Society ("STS"). In Hearing Aids Communication, Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann (eds.). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim, 35--39.Google Scholar
- David Kirsh. 2010. Thinking With the Body. 2864--2869.Google Scholar
- Malene Patsche Kjeldsen and Ben Matthews. 2008. Talking about hearing: Designing from users' problematisations. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges., 531--534. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holger Klapperich and Marc Hassenzahl. 2016. "Hotzenplotz" Reconciling Automation with Experience. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ray Kurzweil. 2006. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin Books, London. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph Lindley and Robert Potts. 2014. Anticipatory Ethnography?: Design Fiction as an Input to Design Ethnography. 237--253.Google Scholar
- William Odom, John Zimmerman, Scott Davidoff, Jodi Forlizzi, Anind K. Dey, and Min Kyung Lee. 2012. A fieldwork of the future with user enactments. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12), 338--347. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennis Schleicher, Peter Jones, and Oksana Kachur. 2010. Bodystorming as embodied designing. interactions 17, 6: 47--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin E.P. Seligman, Tracy A. Steen, Nansook Park, and Christopher Peterson. 2005. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. The American psychologist 60, 5: 410-- 421.Google Scholar
- Louise Skelt. 2011. Dealing with misunderstandings: The sensitivity of repair in hearing-impaired conversation. In Hearing Aids Communication, Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann (eds.). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim, 56--66.Google Scholar
- Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things (Mediaworks Pamphlets).Google Scholar
- Lucille Alice Suchman. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations. Camebride University Press, Cambridge. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=related:sJbJxg4KmIUJ:scholar.g oogle.com/&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
- Danielle Wilde. 2015. Embodying Material Ideation. In Participatory Innovation Conference 2015, 386--393.Google Scholar
- Danielle Wilde and Jenny Underwood. 2017. Designing towards the Unknown: Engaging with Material and Aesthetic Uncertainty. Informatics 5, 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Danielle Wilde and Anna Vallgårda. 2017. Embodied Design Ideation Methods?: Analysing the Power of Estrangement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5158--5170. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2702123.2702393 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Changing Perspective: A Co-Design Approach to Explore Future Possibilities of Divergent Hearing
Recommendations
The Attentive Hearing Aid: Eye Selection of Auditory Sources for Hearing Impaired Users
INTERACT '09: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part IAn often-heard complaint about hearing aids is that their amplification of environmental noise makes it difficult for users to focus on one particular speaker. In this paper, we present a new prototype Attentive Hearing Aid (AHA) based on ViewPointer, a ...
Frequency compression of speech for the hearing impaired: an FBS approach
ISCGAV'07: Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Signal Processing, Computational Geometry & Artificial VisionHearing impairment leads to loss of social connection. It has become the most common of disabilities in the present world scenario. Numerous things can damage the complex and delicate structure of the cochlea causing hearing deficit called sensorineural ...
Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms
Special issue on the nature of speech perception (the psychophysics of speech perception III)People with sensorineural hearing impairment typically have more difficulty than normally hearing people in understanding speech in the presence of background sounds. This paper starts by quantifying the magnitude of the problem in various listening ...
Comments