ABSTRACT
Over the last decade, advances in machine learning have multiplied the possibilities for applications of artificial intelligence. One of these applications are digital companions that assist their users in tasks and activities. In this study, we wanted to evaluate whether digital companions can be designed to create possibilities for positive experiences in work contexts and also be perceived as such using a Wizard-of-Oz prototype of a companion that supports workshop planning. We find that the work is perceived as more positive, more natural, and the content that is presented as more positive after the interaction with a companion that has been designed for positive experience compared to a neutral companion with the same functionality.
- C. Oh, J. Song, J. Choi, S. Kim, S. Lee, and B. Suh, "I Lead, You Help but Only with Enough Details," Proc. 2018 CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI '18, pp. 1--13, 2018. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hassenzahl, K. Eckoldt, S. Diefenbach, M. Laschke, E. Lenz, and J. Kim, "Designing Moments of Meaning and Pleasure. Experience Design and Happiness Understanding Experiences," Int. J. Des., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 21--31, 2013.Google Scholar
- W. Wahlster, "Künstliche Intelligenz als Grundlage autonomer Systeme," Informatik-Spektrum, vol. 40, 5, pp. 409--418, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Bunt, C. Conati, and J. McGrenere, "Mixed-Initiative Interface Personalization as a Case Study in Usable AI," AI Mag., vol. 30, no. 4, p. 58, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. D. Jameson, "Understanding and Dealing With Usability Side Effects of Intelligent Processing," AI Mag., vol. 30, no. 4, p. 23, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ISO 9241--110, "Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 110: Dialogue principles," Berlin, 2006.Google Scholar
- S. Biundo, D. Höller, B. Schattenberg, and P. Bercher, "Companion-Technology?: An Overview," KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 11--20, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. L. C. Law and P. van Schaik, "Modelling user experience -- An agenda for research and practice," Interact. Comput., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 313--322, Sep. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky, "User Experience -- a research agenda," Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 91--97, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Hornbæk and M. Hertzum, "Technology Acceptance and User Experience: A Review of the Experiential Component in HCI," ACM Trans. Comput. Interact., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1--30, 2017. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Norman, Emotional Design - Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books, 2004.Google Scholar
- M. Hassenzahl, "User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality," in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine, 2008, pp. 11--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hassenzahl, S. Diefenbach, and A. Göritz, "Needs, affect, and interactive products -- Facets of user experience," Interact. Comput., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 353--362, Sep. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. T. Thielsch, I. Blotenberg, and R. Jaron, "User Evaluation of Websites: From First Impression to Recommendation," Interact. Comput., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 89--102, Jun. 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Kohler, S. Niebuhr, and M. Hassenzahl, "Stay on the Ball! An Interaction Pattern Approach to the Engineering of Motivation," in Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2007, 2007, vol. 4662, pp. 519--522. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Lu and V. Roto, "Design for Pride in the Workplace," Psychol. Well. Being., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 6, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Lu and V. Roto, "Evoking meaningful experiences at work -- a positive design framework for work tools," J. Eng. Des., vol. 26, no. 4--6, pp. 1--22, 2015.Google Scholar
- A. N. Tuch, P. van Schaik, and K. Hornbæk, "Leisure and Work, Good and Bad: The Role of Activity Domain and Valence in Modeling User Experience," ACM Trans. Comput. Interact., vol. 23, no. 6, p. 35, 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Burmester, K. M. Zeiner, M. Laib, C. Hermosa Perrino, and M.-L. Queßeleit, "Experience Design and Positive Design as an alternative to classical human factors approaches," in INTERACT 2015, pp. 153--160.Google Scholar
- K. M. Zeiner, M. Laib, K. Schippert, and M. Burmester, "Identifying Experience Categories to Design for Positive Experiences with Technology at Work .," in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2016, pp. 3013--3020. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. M. Zeiner, M. Burmester, K. Haasler, J. Henschel, M. Laib, and K. Schippert, "Designing for Positive User Experience in Work Contexts -- Experience Categories and their Applications," Hum. Technol., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 140-175, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Burmester and K. M. Zeiner, "Positive User Experience im Kontext smarter Arbeitsplätze," in Workshopband der Mensch und Computer 2018, 2018.Google Scholar
- M. Minge, L. Riedel, and M. Thüring, "Modulare Evaluation interaktiver Technik. Entwicklung und Validierung des meCUE Fragebogens zur Messung der User Experience," in Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Mensch-TechnikInteraktion. 10. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch- Maschine-Systeme, 2013, pp. 28--36.Google Scholar
- J. F. Kelley, "An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications," ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26--41, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Bruun and S. Ahm, "Mind the Gap! Comparing Retrospective and Concurrent Ratings of Emotion in User Experience Evaluation," in Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2015, 2015, pp. 89--109.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Creating Positive Experiences with Digital Companions
Recommendations
Moving beyond assistance: psychological qualities of digital companions
NordiCHI '18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer InteractionDigital assistant technologies are becoming increasingly common at home. These technologies also hold high potential through supporting individuals at work. However, it remains a challenge for research to understand which psychological features should ...
Digital Companion for Industry
WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web ConferenceThe industrial domain offers a high degree of standardization, a variety of very specialized use cases, and an abundance of resources. These characteristics provide perfect conditions for Digital Companion systems. A Digital Companion is a cognitive ...
Wizard of Oz experiments for companions
BCS-HCI '09: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and TechnologyWizard of Oz experiments allow designers and developers to see the reactions of people as they interact with to-be-developed technologies. At the Centre for Interaction Design at Edinburgh Napier University we are developing a Wizard of Oz system to ...
Comments