skip to main content
10.1145/3298689.3346988acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

User-centered evaluation of strategies for recommending sequences of points of interest to groups

Published:10 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most recommender systems (RSs) predict the preferences of individual users; however, in certain scenarios, recommendations need to be made for a group of users. Tourism is a popular domain for group recommendations because people often travel in groups and look for point of interest (POI) sequences for their visits during a trip. In this study, we present different strategies that can be used to recommend POI sequences for groups. In addition, we introduce novel approaches, including a strategy called Split Group, which allows groups to split into smaller groups during a trip. We compared all strategies in a user study with 40 real groups. Our results proved that there was a significant difference in the quality of recommendations generated by using the different strategies. Most groups were willing to split temporarily during a trip, even when they were traveling with persons close to them. In this case, Split Group generated the best recommendations for different evaluation criteria. We use these findings to propose improvements for group recommendation strategies in the tourism domain.

References

  1. Aris Anagnostopoulos, Reem Atassi, Luca Becchetti, Adriano Fazzone, and Fabrizio Silvestri. 2017. Tour recommendation for groups. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 31, 5 (01 Sep 2017), 1157--1188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Liliana Ardissono, Anna Goy, Giovanna Petrone, Marino Segnan, and Pietro Torasso. 2002. Tailoring the Recommendation of Tourist Information to Heterogeneous User Groups. In Revised Papers from the Nternational Workshops OHS-7, SC-3, and AH-3 on Hypermedia: Openness, Structural Awareness, and Adaptivity. Springer-Verlag, London, UK, UK, 280--295. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=648105.746696 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jie Bao, Yu Zheng, David Wilkie, and Mohamed Mokbel. 2015. Recommendations in location-based social networks: a survey. Geoinformatica 19, 3 (01 Jul 2015), 525--565. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Joan Borràs, Antonio Moreno, and Aida Valls. 2014. Intelligent tourism recommender systems: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications 41, 16 (2014), 7370 -- 7389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. William Jay Conover. 1999. Practical nonparametric statistics (3. ed ed.). Wiley, New York, NY {u.a.}. http://gso.gbv.de/DB=2.1/CMD?ACT=SRCHA&SRT=YOP&IKT=1016&TRM=ppn+24551600X&sourceid=fbw_bibsonomyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Luis M. de Campos, Juan M. Fernández-Luna, Juan F. Huete, and Miguel A. Rueda-Morales. 2009. Managing uncertainty in group recommending processes. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19, 3 (01 Aug 2009), 207--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Donelson R. Forsyth. 2018. Group dynamics. Cengage Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Damianos Gavalas, Michael Kenteris, Charalampos Konstantopoulos, and Grammati Pantziou. 2012. Web application for recommending personalised mobile tourist routes. Software, IET 6, 4 (2012), 313--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Aldy Gunawan, Hoong Chuin Lau, and Pieter Vansteenwegen. 2016. Orienteering Problem: A survey of recent variants, solution approaches and applications. European Journal of Operational Research (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Francesca Guzzi, Francesco Ricci, and Robin Burke. 2011. Interactive Multiparty Critiquing for Group Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daniel Herzog, Christopher Laß, and Wolfgang Wörndl. 2018. TourRec: A Tourist Trip Recommender System for Individuals and Groups. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 496--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel Herzog and Wolfgang Wörndl. 2019. A User Study on Groups Interacting with Tourist Trip Recommender Systems in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 130--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mario Lenz. 1994. CaBaTa: Case-based Reasoning for Holiday Planning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies in Tourism. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 126--132. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=184620.184769 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kwan Hui Lim, Jeffrey Chan, Christopher Leckie, and Shanika Karunasekera. 2015. Personalized Tour Recommendation Based on User Interests and Points of Interest Visit Durations. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'15). AAAI Press, 1778--1784. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2832415.2832496 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Judith Masthoff. 2004. Group Modeling: Selecting a Sequence of Television Items to Suit a Group of Viewers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14, 1 (Feb. 2004), 37--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Judith Masthoff. 2015. Group Recommender Systems: Aggregation, Satisfaction and Group Attributes. In Recommender Systems Handbook, Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). Springer US, Boston, MA, 743--776.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Joseph F McCarthy. 2002. Pocket restaurantfinder: A situated recommender system for groups. In Proceeding of the Workshop on Mobile Ad-Hoc Communication at the 2002 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kevin McCarthy, Lorraine McGinty, Barry Smyth, and Maria Salamó. 2006. The Needs of the Many: A Case-based Group Recommender System. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR'06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 196--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Thuy Ngoc Nguyen and Francesco Ricci. 2017. A Chat-Based Group Recommender System for Tourism. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017, Roland Schegg and Brigitte Stangl (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 17--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pearl Pu, Li Chen, and Rong Hu. 2011. A User-centric Evaluation Framework for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 157--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Francesco Ricci. 2002. Travel Recommender Systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2002), 55--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Francesco Ricci and H Werthner. 2001. Case Base Querying for Travel Planning Recommendation. Information Technology & Tourism 4 (01 2001), 215--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kadri Sylejmani, Jürgen Dorn, and Nysret Musliu. 2017. Planning the trip itinerary for tourist groups. Information Technology & Tourism 17, 3 (01 Sep 2017), 275--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pieter Vansteenwegen, Wouter Souffriau, Greet Vanden Berghe, and Dirk Van Oudheusden. 2011. The City Trip Planner. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 6 (June 2011), 6540--6546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pieter Vansteenwegen and Dirk Van Oudheusden. 2007. The mobile tourist guide: an OR opportunity. OR Insight 20, 3 (2007), 21--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Suhang Wang, Yilin Wang, Jiliang Tang, Kai Shu, Suhas Ranganath, and Huan Liu. 2017. What Your Images Reveal: Exploiting Visual Contents for Point-of-Interest Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '17). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 391--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wolfgang Wörndl, Alexander Hefele, and Daniel Herzog. 2017. Recommending a sequence of interesting places for tourist trips. Information Technology & Tourism 17, 1 (2017), 31--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jason Shuo Zhang, Mike Gartrell, Richard Han, Qin Lv, and Shivakant Mishra. 2019. GEVR: An Event Venue Recommendation System for Groups of Mobile Users. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 1, Article 34 (March 2019), 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User-centered evaluation of strategies for recommending sequences of points of interest to groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      RecSys '19: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      September 2019
      635 pages
      ISBN:9781450362436
      DOI:10.1145/3298689

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      RecSys '19 Paper Acceptance Rate36of189submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader