skip to main content
10.1145/3304112.3325613acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A measurement study of YouTube 360° live video streaming

Published:21 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

360° live video streaming is becoming increasingly popular. While providing viewers with enriched experience, 360° live video streaming is challenging to achieve since it requires a significantly higher bandwidth and a powerful computation infrastructure. A deeper understanding of this emerging system would benefit both viewers and system designers. Although prior works have extensively studied regular video streaming and 360° video on demand streaming, we for the first time investigate the performance of 360° live video streaming. We conduct a systematic measurement of YouTube's 360° live video streaming using various metrics in multiple practical settings. Our key findings suggest that viewers are advised not to live stream 4K 360° video, even when dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) is enabled. Instead, 1080p 360° live video can be played smoothly. However, the extremely large one-way video delay makes it only feasible for delay-tolerant broadcasting applications rather than real-time interactive applications. More importantly, we have concluded from our results that the primary design weakness of current systems lies in inefficient server processing, non-optimal rate adaptation, and conservative buffer management. Our research insight will help to build a clear understanding of today's 360° live video streaming and lay a foundation for future research on this emerging yet relatively unexplored area.

References

  1. Stats you need to know about live-streaming video in 2018, 2018. https://www.talkpoint.com/stats-you-need-to-know-about-live-streaming-video-in-2018/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Yu, Y. Xu, B. Liu, and Y. Liu. "can you see me now?" a measurement study of mobile video calls. In IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 1456--1464, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Y. Ding, Y. Du, Y. Hu, Z. Liu, L. Wang, K. Ross, and A. Ghose. Broadcast yourself: understanding youtube uploaders. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference (IMC '11), pages 361--371, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. O. L. Haimson and J. C. Tang. What makes live events engaging on facebook live, periscope, and snapchat. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), pages 48--60, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C.-L. Fan, J. Lee, W.-C. Lo, C.-Y. Huang, K.-T. Chen, and C.-H. Hsu. Fixation prediction for 360° video streaming in head-mounted virtual reality. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV '17), pages 67--72, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. X. Corbillon, G. Simon, A. Devlic, and J. Chakaresk. Viewport-adaptive navigable 360-degree video delivery. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pages 1--7, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Nguyen, Z. Yan, and K. Nahrstedt. Your attention is unique: Detecting 360-degree video saliency in head-mounted display for head movement prediction. In 2018 ACM Multimedia Conference on Multimedia Conference (MM '18), pages 1190--1198, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Qian, B. Han, Q. Xiao, and V. Gopalakrishnan. Flare: Practical viewport-adaptive 360-degree video streaming for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '18), pages 99--114, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Qian, L. Ji, B. Han, and V. Gopalakrishnan. Optimizing 360 video delivery over cellular networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on All Things Cellular Operations, Applications and Challenges (ATC '16), pages 1--6, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Xiao, C. Zhou, Y. Liu, and S. Chen. Optile: Toward optimal tiling in 360-degree video streaming. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '18), pages 708--716, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Xie, Z. Xu, Y. Ban, X. Zhang, and Z. Guo. 360probdash: Improving qoe of 360 video streaming using tile-based http adaptive streaming. In Proceedings of the ACM on Multimedia Conference (MM '17), pages 315--323, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Zare, A. Aminlou, M. M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj. Hevc-compliant tile-based streaming of panoramic video for virtual reality applications. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '16), pages 601--605, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Jiang, V. Swaminathan, and S. Wei. Power evaluation of 360 vr video streaming on head mounted display devices. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV '17), pages 55--60, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Z. Yan, C. Song, F. Lin, and W. Xu. Exploring eye adaptation in head-mounted display for energy efficient smartphone virtual reality. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems & Applications (HotMobile '18), pages 13--18, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. W.-C. Lo, C.-L. Fan, S.-C. Yen, and C.-H. Hsu. Performance measurements of 360° video streaming to head-mounted displays over live 4g cellular networks. In 2017 Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS), pages 205--210, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Zhou, Z. Li, and Y. Liu. A measurement study of oculus 360 degree video streaming. In Proceedings of the ACM on Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '17). ACM, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Youtube help: Introduction to live streaming, 2019. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2474026?hl=en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Hosseini. View-aware tile-based adaptations in 360 virtual reality video streaming. In IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pages 423--424, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, and Kori M. Inkpen. Meerkat and periscope: I stream, you stream, apps stream for live streams. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), pages 4770--4780, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. W. A. Hamilton, O. Garretson, and A. Kerne. Streaming on twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In in Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), pages 1315--1324, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Afzal, J. Chen, and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Characterization of 360-degree videos. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Network (VR/AR Network '17), pages 1--6, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Croig Oda. Theta v client mode configuration guide, 2018. https://community.theta360.guide/t/theta-v-client-mode-configuration-guide/2565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Plug-in store, 2018. https://pluginstore.theta360.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Iframe api, 2018. https://developers.google.com/youtube.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. F. Dobrian, V. Sekar, I. Stoica, and h. Zhang. Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference (SIGCOMM '11), pages 362--373, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A measurement study of YouTube 360° live video streaming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      NOSSDAV '19: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video
      June 2019
      86 pages
      ISBN:9781450362986
      DOI:10.1145/3304112

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      NOSSDAV '19 Paper Acceptance Rate12of32submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate118of363submissions,33%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader