skip to main content
10.1145/330908.331890acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Do visualizations improve program comprehensibility? experiments with control structure diagrams for Java

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, the first in a series of planned comprehension experiments was performed to measure the effect of the control structure diagram (CSD) on program comprehensibility. Upper-division computer science students were asked to respond to questions regarding the structure and execution of a source code module written in Java. Statistical analysis of the data collected from this experiment revealed that the CSD was highly significant in enhancing the subjects' performance in this program comprehension task. The results of this initial experiment along with the planned follow-on experiments promise to shed light on fundamental questions regarding the effect of software visualizations on program comprehensibility.

References

  1. 1.Barnes, J. G. P. (1984) Programming in Ada, Second Edition, Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Cant, S.N., Jeffery, D.R., and Henderson-Sellers, B. (1995). A Conceptual Model of Cognitive Complexity of Elements of the Programming Process. Information and Software Technology, 37 (7), pp. 351-362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.Cross, J.H., Maghsoodloo, S., and Hendrix, T.D. (1998). The Control Structure Diagram: An Initial Evaluation. Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 131- 156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Curtis, B., Sheppard, S., Kruesi-Bailey, E., Bailey, J, and Boehm-Davis, D.A. (1989). Experimental Evaluation of Software Documentation Formats. The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 9, pp. 167-207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Goolkasian, Paula (1996). Picture-Word Differences in a Sentence Verification Task. Memory & Cognition, 24, 584-594.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Hendrix, T.D., Cross, J.H., Barowski, L.A., and Mathias, K.S. (1998). Visual Support for Incremental Abstraction and Refinement in Ada 95. Proceedings of SIGAcla '98, Washington, D.C., November 10-12, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Do visualizations improve program comprehensibility? experiments with control structure diagrams for Java

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGCSE '00: Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
                May 2000
                429 pages
                ISBN:1581132131
                DOI:10.1145/330908

                Copyright © 2000 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 March 2000

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                SIGCSE '00 Paper Acceptance Rate78of220submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

                Upcoming Conference

                SIGCSE Virtual 2024

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader