skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376295acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BrailleBlocks: Computational Braille Toys for Collaborative Learning

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Braille literacy has fallen in recent years, and many blind children now grow up without learning Braille. However, learning Braille can increase employment chances and improve literacy skills. We introduce BrailleBlocks, a system to help visually impaired children learn and practice Braille alongside a sighted parent. BrailleBlocks comprises a set of tangible blocks and pegs, each block representing a Braille cell, and an associated application with games. The system automatically tracks and recognizes the blocks so that parents can follow along even if they cannot read Braille. We conducted a user study to test BrailleBlocks with five families, with five parents and six visually impaired children. The contributions of this work are a novel approach to Braille education toys, observations of how visually impaired children and sighted parents used this system together, their insights on current issues with Braille educational tools, and actionable feedback for future Braille-based learning tools.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper168vf.mp4

mp4

158.8 MB

paper168pv.mp4

mp4

8.3 MB

a168-gadiraju-presentation.mp4

mp4

48.3 MB

References

  1. American Print House for the Blind. 2017. Annual Report 2017: Distribution of Eligible Students Based on Federal Quota Census of January 4, 2016 (Fiscal Year 2016). www.aph.org/federal-quota/distributionof-students-2017/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Maria C. C. Araújo, Antônio R. S. Silva, Ticianne G. R. Darin, Everardo L. de Castro, Rossana M. C. Andrade, Ernesto T. de Lima, Jaime Sánchez, José Aires de C. Filho, and Windson Viana. 2016. Design and Usability of a Braille-based Mobile Audiogame Environment. In Proceedings of SAC 2016. (p. 232238.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2018. (p. 161--173.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dorwina Nowill Foundation for the Blind. 2016. Meet Braille Bricks #BrailleBricksForAll. Video. Retrieved September 13, 2019 from www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV79fzEVr_s.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Braille Works. 2019. Braille literacy statistics and how they relate to equality. http://www.brailleworks.com/braille-literacystatistics/wGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Collaborative accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-create Accessible Home Spaces. In Proceedings of CHI 2015. (p. 2373--2382.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-ability Workplaces. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2015. (p. 163--171).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Richard Goldberg, Randal Cole, Arielle Drummond, and Diane Brauner. 2005. Apparatus and method for Braille instruction, U.S. Patent Application 10/689,796, Filed April 21, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. João Guerreiro, Daniel Gonçalves, Diogo Marques, T. Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, and Kyle Montague. 2013. The Today and Tomorrow of Braille Learning. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2013, Article 71, (p.1--2.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering Individuals with Do-It-Yourself Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2011. (p.1118).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Judith Hurst. 1997. Talk from the VI teachers' lounge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rabia Jafri. 2014. Electronic Braille Blocks: A Tangible Interface-based Application for Teaching Braille Letter Recognition to Very Young Blind Children. In Proceedings of ICCHP 2014. (p. 551558.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Varsha Koushik, Darren Guinness, and Shaun K. Kane. 2019. StoryBlocks: A Tangible Programming Game to Create Accessible Audio Stories. In Proceedings of CHI 2019, Paper 492. (p.1--12).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Young T. Kwon and Ji Ho Kang. 2008. Braille block. U.S. Patent Application No. 11/854,385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. The LEGO Group. 2019. Braille Bricks. www.legobraillebricks.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauren R. Milne, Cynthia L. Bennett, Richard E. Ladner, and Shiri Azenkot. 2014. BraillePlay: Educational Smartphone Games for Blind Children. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2014. (p.137--144.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Cecily Morrison, Nicolas Villar, Anja Thieme, Zahra Ashktorab, Eloise Taysom, Oscar Salandin, Daniel Cletheroe, Greg Saul, Alan F. Blackwell, Darren Edge, Martin Grayson, and Haiyan Zhang. 2018. Torino: A Tangible Programming Language Inclusive of Children with Visual Disabilities. Human-Computer Interaction. (p.1--49).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lutfun Nahar, Azizah Jaafar, Eistiak Ahamed and A. B. M. A. Kaish. 2015. Design of a Braille Learning Application for Visually Impaired Students in Bangladesh. Assistive Technology, 27:3, (p.172182.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. National Federation of the Blind. 2009. The Braille literacy crisis in America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Perkins Brailler. Retrieved September 13, 2019 from brailler.perkins.org/pages/perkins-brailler.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. PlanToys. Braille Alphabet A-Z. www.global.plantoys.com/shop/learningeducation/braille-alphabet-a-z.html.wGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sara Price, Yvonne Rogers, Michael Scaife, Danae Stanton, and Helen Neale. 2003. Using 'Tangibles' to Promote Novel Forms of Playful Learning. Interacting with Computers 15, no. 2. (p.169--185.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney, Andrés MonroyHernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennen, Amon Millner, Eric Rosenbaum, Jay Silver, Brian Silverman, and Yasmin Kafai. 2009. Scratch: Programming for All. Communications of the ACM. (p.60--67)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sue Rogers. 2007. Learning Braille and Print Together - the Mainstream Issues. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 25(2), (p.120--132.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ruby Ryles. 1996. The Impact of Braille Reading Skills on Employment, Income, Education, and Reading Habits. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 90. (p.219--226.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Abigale Stangl, Jeeeun Kim, and Tom Yeh. 2014. Technology to Support Emergent Literacy Skills in Young Children with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings IDC 2014. (p. 321--324).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Anselm L. Strauss. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tack-Tiles. 1999. www.tack-tiles.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Michael J. Tobin, and Eileen W. Hill. 2015. Is Literacy for Blind People Under Threat? Does Braille Have a Future? British Journal of Visual Impairment, vol. 33, no. 3, (pp. 239--250.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jaroslaw Wiazowski. 2014. Can Braille be Revived? A Possible Impact of High-end Braille and Mainstream Technology on the Revival of Tactile Literacy Medium. Assistive Technology, 26(4). (p.227--230.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. BrailleBlocks: Computational Braille Toys for Collaborative Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      10688 pages
      ISBN:9781450367080
      DOI:10.1145/3313831

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format