skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376767acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reframing Disability as Competency: Unpacking Everyday Technology Practices of People with Visual Impairments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

More than a billion people in the world live with some form of visual impairment, and a wide variety of technologies are now routinely used by them in the course of 'getting on' in everyday life. However, little is known about the ways in which assistive and non-assistive technologies are brought to bear on material practices. We present findings from a four-month ethnographic study facilitated by a local branch of a UK charity that supports people with visual impairments. Our study explores mainstream and assistive technology use within their everyday lives. We identify three main sites for technology use: social relations and communication practices, textual reading practices, and mobility practices. Via an ethnographic approach we contribute to understanding how people accomplish such practices, and in doing so, uncover the practical competencies that enable people with visual impairments to conduct their everyday activities. Thus we investigate how disability can be thought of in terms of competencies, arguing that understanding of competencies can enrich the design of technologies that fit the needs of people with visual impairments.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a638-reyes-cruz-presentation.mp4

mp4

88.7 MB

References

  1. Ali Abdolrahmani, Ravi Kuber, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. "Siri Talks at You": An Empirical Investigation of Voice-Activated Personal Assistant (VAPA) Usage by Individuals Who Are Blind. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '18, ACM Press, 249--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali Abdolrahmani, Ravi Kuber, and Amy Hurst. 2016. An empirical investigation of the situationally-induced impairments experienced by blind mobile device users. Proceedings of the 13th Web for All Conference on - W4A '16, ACM Press, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mauro Avila, Katrin Wolf, Anke Brock, and Niels Henze. 2016. Remote Assistance for Blind Users in Daily Life: A Survey about Be My Eyes. Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA '16, ACM Press, 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Shiri Azenkot and Nicole B. Lee. 2013. Exploring the use of speech input by blind people on mobile devices. Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '13, ACM Press, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rachel Bartlett, Yi Xuan Khoo, Juan Pablo Hourcade, and Kyle K. Rector. 2019. Exploring the Opportunities for Technologies to Enhance Quality of Life with People who have Experienced Vision Loss. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, ACM Press, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '18, ACM Press, 161--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cynthia L. Bennett, Burren Peil, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS '19, ACM Press, 35--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Alexy Bhowmick and Shyamanta M. Hazarika. 2017. An insight into assistive technology for the visually impaired and blind people: state-of-the-art and future trends. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 11, 2: 149--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Danielle Bragg, Cynthia Bennett, Katharina Reinecke, and Richard Ladner. 2018. A Large Inclusive Study of Human Listening Rates. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, ACM Press, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, ACM Press, 2373--2382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michele A. Burton, Erin Brady, Robin Brewer, Callie Neylan, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Amy Hurst. 2012. Crowdsourcing subjective fashion advice using VizWiz: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 135--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Andrew Crabtree, Mark Rouncefield, and Peter Tolmie. 2012. Doing design ethnography. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael D. Crossland, Rui S. Silva, and Antonio F. Macedo. 2014. Smartphone, tablet computer and e-reader use by people with vision impairment. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 34, 5: 552--557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rafael Jeferson Pezzuto Damaceno, Juliana Cristina Braga, and Jesús Pascual Mena-Chalco. 2018. Mobile device accessibility for the visually impaired: problems mapping and recommendations. Universal Access in the Information Society 17, 2: 421--435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Guy Dewsbury, Karen Clarke, Dave Randall, Mark Rouncefield, and Ian Sommerville. 2004. The anti-social model of disability. Disability & Society 19, 2: 145--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Brian L Due and Simon Bierring Lange. 2018. Troublesome Objects: Unpacking Ocular-Centrism in Urban Environments by Studying Blind Navigation Using Video Ethnography and Ethnomethodology. Sociological Research Online: 136078041881196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Brian Due and Simon Lange. 2018. Semiotic resources for navigation: A video ethnographic study of blind people's uses of the white cane and a guide dog for navigating in urban areas. Semiotica 2018, 222: 287--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Silvia B. Fajardo-Flores, Laura S. Gaytán-Lugo, Pedro C. Santana-Mancilla, and Miguel A. Rodríguez-Ortiz. 2017. Mobile Accessibility for People with Combined Visual and Motor Impairment: A case Study. Proceedings of the 8th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - CLIHC '17, ACM Press, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Heather A. Faucett, Kate E. Ringland, Amanda L. L. Cullen, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2017. (In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 10, 4: 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Christopher Frauenberger. 2015. Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility - ASSETS '15, ACM Press, 89--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Harold Garfinkel. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Harold Garfinkel and Anne Warfield Rawls. 2002. Ethnomethodology's program: working out Durkeim's aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. 2005. Feminist Disability Studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30, 2: 1557--1587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. João Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Daisuke Sato, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2019. Airport Accessibility and Navigation Assistance for People with Visual Impairments. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, ACM Press, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. João Guerreiro and Daniel Gonçalves. 2014. Text-to-speeches: evaluating the perception of concurrent speech by blind people. Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility - ASSETS '14, ACM Press, 169--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tiago Guerreiro, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2010. Identifying the relevant individual attributes for a successful non-visual mobile experience. Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics - ECCE '10, ACM Press, 27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Alison Kafer. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Vaishnav Kameswaran, Jatin Gupta, Joyojeet Pal, et al. 2018. "We can go anywhere": Understanding Independence through a Case Study of Ride-hailing Use by People with Visual Impairments in metropolitan India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW: 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Shaun K. Kane, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2008. Slide rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - Assets '08, ACM Press, 73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. Proceeding of the eleventh international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - ASSETS '09, ACM Press, 115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Dirk vom Lehn. 2010. Discovering 'Experience-ables': Socially including visually impaired people in art museums. Journal of Marketing Management 26, 7--8: 749--769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Barbara Leporini, Maria Claudia Buzzi, and Marina Buzzi. 2012. Interacting with mobile devices via VoiceOver: usability and accessibility issues. Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, 339--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Julie Miller, Samantha Brady, Chaiwoo Lee, et al. 2018. How The "Oldest Old" Experience and Adapt to Vision and Hearing Loss Through the Use of Assistive Technologies. Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and Society on ZZZ - TechMindSociety '18, ACM Press, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Meredith Ringel Morris, Annuska Zolyomi, Catherine Yao, Sina Bahram, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Shaun K. Kane. 2016. "With most of it being pictures now, I rarely use it": Understanding Twitter's Evolving Accessibility to Blind Users. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, ACM Press, 5506--5516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. A. F. Newell and P. Gregor. 1999. Extra-Ordinary Human-Machine Interaction: What can be Learned from People with Disabilities? Cognition, Technology & Work 1, 2: 78--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. João Oliveira, Tiago Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2011. Blind people and mobile touch-based text-entry: acknowledging the need for different flavors. The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 179--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Mike Oliver. 2013. The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disability & Society 28, 7: 1024--1026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. World Health Organization. 2011. World report on disability 2011. World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Joyojeet Pal, Anandhi Viswanathan, Priyank Chandra, et al. 2017. Agency in Assistive Technology Adoption: Visual Impairment and Smartphone Use in Bangalore. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, ACM Press, 5929--5940.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Umesh Persad, Patrick Langdon, and John Clarkson. 2007. Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Universal Access in the Information Society 6, 2: 119--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2018. Care work: Dreaming disability justice. arsenal pulp press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Alisha Pradhan, Kanika Mehta, and Leah Findlater. 2018. "Accessibility Came by Accident": Use of Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants by People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, ACM Press, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. David Randall, Richard Harper, and Mark Rouncefield. 2007. Fieldwork for design: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. André Rodrigues, Kyle Montague, Hugo Nicolau, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2015. Getting Smartphones to Talkback: Understanding the Smartphone Adoption Process of Blind Users. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility - ASSETS '15, ACM Press, 23--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Jaime Sánchez and Héctor Flores. 2003. Memory enhancement through audio. Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 24--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2019. Situationally-Induced Impairments and Disabilities Research. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.06128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Sami Schalk. 2018. Bodyminds Reimagined:(Dis) ability, Race, and Gender in Black Women's Speculative Fiction. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kristen Shinohara and Josh Tenenberg. 2007. Observing Sara: a case study of a blind person's interactions with technology. Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - Assets '07, ACM Press, 171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '11, ACM Press, 705.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8, 2: 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Berglind F. Smaradottir, Jarle A. Håland, and Santiago G. Martinez. 2018. User Evaluation of the Smartphone Screen Reader VoiceOver with Visually Disabled Participants. Mobile Information Systems 2018: 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Ji-Won Song and Sung-Ho Yang. 2010. Touch your way: haptic sight for visually impaired people to walk with independence. Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '10, ACM Press, 3343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Sarit Felicia Anais Szpiro, Shafeka Hashash, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. How People with Low Vision Access Computing Devices: Understanding Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '16, ACM Press, 171--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Sarit Szpiro, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. Finding a store, searching for a product: a study of daily challenges of low vision people. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp '16, ACM Press, 61--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Anja Thieme, Cynthia L. Bennett, Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, and Alex S. Taylor. 2018. ?I can do everything but see!" -- How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate their Abilities in Social Contexts. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, ACM Press, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Shannon M. Tomlinson. 2016. Perceptions of accessibility and usability by blind or visually impaired persons: A pilot study: Perceptions of Accessibility and Usability by Blind or Visually Impaired Persons: A Pilot Study. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 53, 1: 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Shari Trewin, John Richards, Rachel Bellamy, et al. 2010. Toward modeling auditory information seeking strategies on the web. Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '10, ACM Press, 3973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Marynel Vázquez and Aaron Steinfeld. 2012. Helping visually impaired users properly aim a camera. Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - ASSETS '12, ACM Press, 95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Violeta Voykinska, Shiri Azenkot, Shaomei Wu, and Gilly Leshed. 2016. How Blind People Interact with Visual Content on Social Networking Services. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16, ACM Press, 1582--1593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Herman Wahidin, Jenny Waycott, and Steven Baker. 2018. The challenges in adopting assistive technologies in the workplace for people with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction - OzCHI '18, ACM Press, 432--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Susan Wendell. 2013. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Brian Wentz and Jonathan Lazar. 2011. Usability evaluation of email applications by blind users. Journal of Usability Studies 6, 2: 75--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 3: 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Hanlu Ye, Meethu Malu, Uran Oh, and Leah Findlater. 2014. Current and future mobile and wearable device use by people with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, ACM Press, 3123--3132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Yuhang Zhao, Elizabeth Kupferstein, Doron Tal, and Shiri Azenkot. 2018. "It Looks Beautiful but Scary": How Low Vision People Navigate Stairs and Other Surface Level Changes. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '18, ACM Press, 307--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Annuska Zolyomi, Anushree Shukla, and Jaime Snyder. 2017. Technology-Mediated Sight: A Case Study of Early Adopters of a Low Vision Assistive Technology. Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '17, ACM Press, 220--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reframing Disability as Competency: Unpacking Everyday Technology Practices of People with Visual Impairments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      10688 pages
      ISBN:9781450367080
      DOI:10.1145/3313831

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format