skip to main content
10.1145/332040.332440acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The impact of fluid documents on reading and browsing: an observational study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fluid Documents incorporate additional information into a page by adjusting typography using interactive animation. One application is to support hypertext browsing by providing glosses for link anchors. This paper describes an observational study of the impact of Fluid Documents on reading and browsing. The study involved six conditions that differ along several dimensions, including the degree of typographic adjustment and the distance glosses are placed from anchors. Six subjects read and answered questions about two hypertext corpora while being monitored by an eyetracker. The eyetracking data revealed no substantial differenccs in eye behavior between conditions. Gloss placement was significant: subjects required less time to use nearby glosses. Finally, the reaction to the conditions was highly varied, with several conditions receiving both a best and worst rating on the subjective questionnaires. These results suggest implications for the design of dynamic reading environments.

References

  1. 1.A. Aaltonen, A. Hyrskykari, K. Raiha. 101 spots, or how do users read menus? Proc CHI'98, 132-139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.B. Bederson, J. Hollan. Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. Proc. UIST'94, 17-26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.J. Bransford, M. Johnson. Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W.G. Chase (ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973,383-438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.B. Chang, J. Mackinlay, P. Zellweger, T. Igarashi. A negotiation architecture for fluid documents. Proc. UIST'98, 123-132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.J. Conklin. Hypertext: an introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, Sept 1987, 17-41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.G. Furnas. Generalized fisheye views. Proc. CHI'86,16-23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.G. Fumas. Effective view navigation. Proc. CHI'97, 367-374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.T. Igarashi, J. Mackinlay, B. Chang, P. Zellweger. Fluid visualization of spreadsheet structures. Proc. Visual Languages '98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.W. Kintsch. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.T. Kopetzky, M. Miihlh~iuser. Visual preview for link traversal on the World Wide Web. Proc WWW8, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.G. Landow. Relationally encoded links and the rhetoric of hypertext. Proc. Hypertext'87, 331-338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.G. Marchionini, B. Shneiderman. Finding facts vs. browsing knowledge in hypertext systems. IEEE Computer, Jan 1988, 70- 80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.C. McKnight, A. Dillon, J. Richardson. A comparison of linear and hypertext formats in information retrieval. In R. McAlesse, C. Green (eds.), Hypertext: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect Books, Ltd., 1990, 10-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.C. Neuwirth, J. Morris, S. Regli, R. Chandhok, G. Wenger. Envisioning communication: Task-tailorable representations of communication in asynchronous work. Proc. CSCW'98, 265- 274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.J. Nielsen. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for January 11, 1998. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980111 .htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.G. Robertson, S. Card, J. Mackinlay. Information visualization using 3D interactive animation. CACM, 36-(4), 1993, 57-71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.R. Rosenthal, R.L. Rosnow. Contrast Analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.J. Rouet, J. Levonen, A. Dillon, R. Spiro, eds. Hypertext and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.D. Stanyer, R. Procter. Improving Web usability with the link lens. Proc. WWW8, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.P. Zellweger, B. Chang, J. Mackinlay. Fluid links for informed and incremental link transitions. Proc. Hypertext'98, 50-57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.P. Zellweger, B. Chang, J. Mackinlay. Fluid links for informed and incremental hypertext browsing. CHI'99 Extended Abstracts (Video Program, 6:38 minutes), 7-8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The impact of fluid documents on reading and browsing: an observational study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2000
        587 pages
        ISBN:1581132166
        DOI:10.1145/332040

        Copyright © 2000 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 April 2000

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '00 Paper Acceptance Rate72of336submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader