skip to main content
10.1145/3326365.3326409acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Can Blockchain Leverage for New Public Governance?: A Conceptual Analysis on Process Level

Published:03 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

New Public Governance (NPG) as a paradigm for collaborative forms of public service delivery and Blockchain governance are trending topics for researchers and practitioners alike. Thus far, each topic has, on the whole, been discussed separately. This paper presents the preliminary results of ongoing research which aims to shed light on the more concrete benefits of Blockchain for the purpose of NPG. For the first time, a conceptual analysis is conducted on process level to spot benefits and limitations of Blockchain-based governance. Per process element, Blockchain key characteristics are mapped to functional aspects of NPG from a governance perspective. The preliminary results show that Blockchain offers valuable support for governments seeking methods to effectively coordinate co-producing networks. However, the extent of benefits of Blockchain varies across the process elements. It becomes evident that there is a need for off-chain processes. It is, therefore, argued in favour of intensifying research on off-chain governance processes to better understand the implications for and influences on on-chain governance.

References

  1. Stephen P. Osborne, Ed. 2010. The new public governance. Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge, London, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Manuel P. Rodríguez Bolívar. 2018. Smart Technologies for Smart Governments, 24. Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wessel Reijers, Fiachra O'Brolcháin, and Paul Haynes. 2016. Governance in BC Technologies & Social Contract Theories. Ledger, 1, 134--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Göttrik Wewer. 2013. Kollaborative Verwaltung. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven. Die Verwaltung 46, 4, 563--572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn, Ed. 2018. Bitcoin and beyond. Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and global governance. RIPE series in global political economy. Routledge, London, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Steven van de Walle and Sandra Groeneveld, Eds. 2016. Theory and practice of public sector reform. Routledge critical studies in public management, 27. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuno Schedler and Isabella Proeller. 2011. New public management (5th). UTB Public Management, Betriebswirtschaft, 2132. Haupt, Bern.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ruwan Abeysekera. 2015. Concepts and Implications of Theory of Co-production. Colombo Business Journal 6, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Victor A. Pestoff, Taco Brandsen, and Bram Verschuere, Eds. 2012. New public governance, the third sector and co-production. Routledge critical studies in public management, 7. Routledge, New York, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacob Torfing and Peter Triantafillou. 2016. Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fredrika Wiesel and Sven Modell. 2014. From New Public Management to New Public Governance? Hybridization and Implications for Public Sector Consumerism. Financial Accountability & Management 30, 2, 175--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jouke de Vries. 2010. Is New Public Management Really Dead? OECD Journal on Budgeting 10, 1, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jesse Yli-Huumo, Deokyoon Ko, Sujin Choi, Sooyong Park, and Kari Smolander. 2016. Where Is Current Research on BC Technology? A Systematic Review. PloS one 11, 10, e0163477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Svein Ølnes, Jolien Ubacht, and Marijn Janssen. 2017. BC in government. Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly 34, 3, 355--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Roman Beck, Christoph Müller-Bloch, and John L. King. 2018. Governance in the Blockchain Economy. A Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 19, 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Theodor Beutel. 2018. Decentralising Power, Competence and Incentives. A Case Study on Emerging Visions in the Blockchain Space. Master's thesis. University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcella Atzori. 2015. BC Technology and Decentralized Governance. Is the State Still Necessary? SSRN Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sinclair Davidson, Primavera de Filippi, and Jason Potts. 2016. Disrupting Governance. The New Institutional Economics of Distributed Ledger Technology. SSRN Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stefan Seebacher and Ronny Schüritz. 2017. Blockchain Technology as an Enabler of Service Systems. A Structured Literature Review. In Exploring Services Science. 8th International Conference, IESS 2017, Rome, Italy, May 24-26, 2017, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 12--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Stefano Za, Monica Dragoicea, and Maurizio Cavallari, Eds. 2017. Exploring Services Science. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Can Blockchain Leverage for New Public Governance?: A Conceptual Analysis on Process Level

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      April 2019
      538 pages
      ISBN:9781450366441
      DOI:10.1145/3326365

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 April 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICEGOV '19 Paper Acceptance Rate81of171submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader