Alexandra Thompson
ABSTRACT
This paper presents findings from an ongoing investigation into the public understanding of augmented reality (AR) technologies. Despite AR technologies becoming increasingly available to the general public, perceptions of its use and capabilities still vary based on a number of factors. To explore this concept, a survey was conducted into individual's definition of AR and classification of AR and traditional technologies. The themes elicited from responses indicated that digital and real components were both perceived as key characteristics, but the synthesis of these components was not significant. Responses also indicated that the public is still relatively unfamiliar with AR technologies, but familiarity does lend itself to a better understanding of what is or isn't AR. Trends in public perceptions of AR are presented, but also identify the need for more investigation into the public understanding of AR technologies.
- Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S. and MacIntyre, B. 2001. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 21, 6 (Nov. 2001), 34--47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Braiker, B. 2012. Google Project Glass: A new way to see the world. The Guardian.Google Scholar
- Caudell, T.P. and Mizell, D.W. 1992. Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Kauai, HI, USA, 1992), 659--669 vol.2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dogtiev, A. 2016. Pokémon Go Statistics Report. Soko Media.Google Scholar
- Etherington, D. 2017. Snapchat introduces World Lenses -- live filters for just about anything. TechCrunch.Google Scholar
- Favreau, J. 2010. Iron Man 2. Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, S. 2014. Google Glass advice: how to avoid being a glasshole. The Guardian.Google Scholar
- HoloKit: 2018. https://holokit.io. Accessed: 201903--14.Google Scholar
- Irshad, S. and Awang, D.R.B. 2016. User Perception on Mobile Augmented Reality as a marketing tool. 2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS) (Aug. 2016), 109--113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ko, C.-H. and Chang, T.-C. 2012. Evaluation and Student Perception of Augmented Reality-Based Design Collaboration. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (Istanbul, Turkey, 2012), 1311--1316.Google Scholar
- Lucas, G. 1977. Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope. 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
- Magic Leap One: Creator Edition: 2019. https://www.magicleap.com/magic-leap-one. Accessed: 2019-03--14.Google Scholar
- Microsoft HoloLens | Mixed Reality Technology for Business: 2019. https://www.microsoft.com/enus/hololens. Accessed: 2019-03--14.Google Scholar
- Milgram, P. and Kishino, F. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems. 77, D (Dec. 1994), 1321--1329.Google Scholar
- M-Ms Take Home The Fun Promotion: 2019. https://secure.marspromotions.com.au/takehomethefun//FAQ. Accessed: 2019-08-07.Google Scholar
- Olsson, T. and Iham, P. 2009. User expectations for mobile mixed reality services: An initial user study. (2009), 9.Google Scholar
- Radu, I. and Schneider, B. 2019. What Can We Learn from Augmented Reality (AR)? Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19 (Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 2019), 1--12.Google Scholar
- Rauschnabel, P.A., Hein, D.W.E., He, J., Ro, Y.K., Rawashdeh, S. and Krulikowski, B. 2016. Fashion or Technology? A Fashnology Perspective on the Perception and Adoption of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses. i-com. 15, 2 (Jan. 2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2016-0021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spielberg, S. 2002. Minority Report. 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
- Thompson, A. and Potter, L.E. 2019. Overlays and Goggles and Projections, Oh My!: Exploring Public Perceptions of Augmented Reality Technologies. Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Fremantle, WA, Australia, Dec. 2019).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trachtenberg, D. 2016. Playtest. Black Mirror. Netflix.Google Scholar
- Vasquez, N. 2016. 11 Examples of Branded Snapchat Filters & Lenses That Worked. Medium.Google Scholar
- Zemeckis, R. 1989. Back to the Future Part II. Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
- 2016. Pokémon GO. Niantic, Inc.Google Scholar
- 2019. Snapchat. Snap Inc.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Defining AR: Public Perceptions of an Evolving Landscape
Recommendations
Overlays and Goggles and Projections, Oh My!: Exploring Public Perceptions of Augmented Reality Technologies
OzCHI '19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-InteractionAugmented reality (AR) technologies have been available to the general public in varying formats for several years, but confusion remains about what AR actually is, and what it can do. This paper explores how well mental models of the general public ...
Surveying Consumer Understanding & Sentiment Of VR
MMVE '21: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Immersive Mixed and Virtual Environment Systems (MMVE '21)Since the resurgence of consumer-grade virtual reality (VR), VR has successfully established itself on the consumer market. As with any emerging technology, differences can exist between how industry / academia view the technology and how consumers ...
The perceptions of CEIT postgraduate students regarding reality concepts: Augmented, virtual, mixed and mirror reality
The purpose of this study is to determine perception of postgraduate Computer Education and Instructional Technologies (CEIT) students regarding the concepts of Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), Mixed Reality (MR), Augmented Virtuality (AV) ...
Comments