skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382976acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Empowering a Creative City: Engage Citizens in Creating Street Art through Human-AI Collaboration

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

A "creative city" can promote creativity among its citizens and provide them fulfilling lived experience. Such a concept has captivated city authorities worldwide, and motivated plenty of works to investigate how to make our cities more "creative". We argue that there is a need and an opportunity to design interactive technologies to push the creative city agenda. In this paper, we present WeMonet, a design prototype supporting citizens engaging in participatory street art creation via human-AI collaboration. Citizens' sketches are synthesized, enhanced to be more vivid through machine machine learning algorithms, and projected on a screen, forming a participatory artwork. WeMonet aims to promote citizens' engagement in creative practices and hence the city's creativity. More broadly speaking, we hope this work could inspire designers to consider the role of interaction design in the creative city agenda.

References

  1. Mara Balestrini. 2017. A city in common: explorations on sustained community engagement with bottom-up civic technologies. Ph.D. Dissertation. University College London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Susanne Bødker. 2006. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Scott Carter, Elizabeth Churchill, Laurent Denoue, Jonathan Helfman, and Les Nelson. 2004. Digital graffiti: public annotation of multimedia content. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1207--1210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Elizabeth Clark, Anne Spencer Ross, Chenhao Tan, Yangfeng Ji, and Noah A. Smith. 2018. Creative Writing with a Machine in the Loop: Case Studies on Slogans and Stories. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 329--340. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172983Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Patrick Cohendet, David Grandadam, and Laurent Simon. 2010. The anatomy of the creative city. Industry and innovation 17, 1 (2010), 91--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dominik Dellermann, Adrian Calma, Nikolaus Lipusch, Thorsten Weber, Sascha Weigel, and Philipp Ebel. 2019. The Future of Human-AI Collaboration: A Taxonomy of Design Knowledge for Hybrid Intelligence Systems. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Michael Delli Carpini. 2007. Civic engagement. American Psychological Association (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kevin Dzobo, Sampson Adotey, Nicholas E. Thomford, and Witness Dzobo. 0. Integrating Artificial and Human Intelligence: A Partnership for Responsible Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Medicine. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 0, 0 (0), null. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/omi.2019.0038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gabriele Ferri, Nicolai B Hansen, Adam van Heerden, and Ben AM Schouten. 2018. Design Concepts for Empowerment through Urban Play. In DiGRA 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2833--2842. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Hoffman and G. Weinberg. 2010. Gesture-based human-robot Jazz improvisation. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 582--587. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509182Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Noura Howell, Greg Niemeyer, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2019. Life-Affirming Biosensing in Public: Sounding Heartbeats on a Red Bench. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article Paper 680, 16 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300910Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Xun Huang and Serge Belongie. 2017. Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-Time with Adaptive Instance Normalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 1510--1519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Pegah Karimi, Kazjon Grace, Mary Lou Maher, and Nicholas Davis. 2018. Evaluating creativity in computational co-creative systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09886 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Charles Landry. 2012. The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Charles Landry and Franco Bianchini. 1995. The creative city (Vol. 12). Demos 13 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pedro Lucas and Carlos Martinho. 2017. Stay Awhile and Listen to 3Buddy, a Co-creative Level Design Support Tool.. In ICCC. 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jennifer Manuel, Geoff Vigar, Tom Bartindale, and Rob Comber. 2017. Participatory Media: Creating Spaces for Storytelling in Neighbourhood Planning. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1688--1701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Cameron McAuliffe. 2012. Graffiti or street art? Negotiating the moral geographies of the creative city. Journal of urban affairs 34, 2 (2012), 189--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sangkeun Park, Emilia-Stefania Ilincai, Jeungmin Oh, Sujin Kwon, Rabeb Mizouni, and Uichin Lee. 2017. Facilitating Pervasive Community Policing on the Road with Mobile Roadwatch. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3538--3550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Taesung Park, Ming-Yu Liu, Ting-Chun Wang, and Jun-Yan Zhu. 2019. Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalization. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Betty Sargeant, Justin Dwyer, and Florian'Floyd' Mueller. 2018. The Storytelling Machine: A Playful Participatory Automated System Featuring Crowd-Sourced Story Content. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. ACM, 285--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rafael Schacter. 2014. The ugly truth: Street art, graffiti and the creative city. Art & the Public Sphere 3, 2 (2014), 161--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ben Schouten, Gabriele Ferri, Michiel de Lange, and Karel Millenaar. 2017. Games as strong concepts for city-making. In Playable Cities. Springer, 23--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. TeamLab. 2016. Graffiti Nature - Mountains and Valleys. https://www.teamlab.art/w/valleys/. (2016). Accessed Jan 03, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Maurizio Teli, Silvia Bordin, María Menéndez Blanco, Giusi Orabona, and Antonella De Angeli. 2015. Public design of digital commons in urban places: A case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 81 (2015), 17--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lidia Varbanova. 2007. Our creative cities online. The Creative City: Crossing Visions and New Realities in the Region (2007), 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei Wang, Yuan Sun, and Saman Halgamuge. 2019. Improving MMD-GAN Training with Repulsive Loss Function. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Shixiang Wu, Jinjin Gu, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. 2018. ESRGAN: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In The European Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ECCVW).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wikipedia. 2019a. Creative city. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_city. (2019). Accessed Dec 29, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wikipedia. 2019b. Street art in Melbourne. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_art_in_ Melbourne#Public_and_government_responses. (2019). Accessed Dec 29, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharon Zukin. 1995. The cultures of cities. Blackwell Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharon Zukin and Laura Braslow. 2011. The life cycle of New York's creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones. City, Culture and Society 2, 3 (2011), 131--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Empowering a Creative City: Engage Citizens in Creating Street Art through Human-AI Collaboration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      4474 pages
      ISBN:9781450368193
      DOI:10.1145/3334480

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format