skip to main content
10.1145/335603.335680acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Data mining for preterm birth prediction

Published:19 March 2000Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.M.S. Beksac, B. Durak, O. Ozkan, A.N. Cakar, S. Balci, U. Karakas and Y. Laleli, An artificial intelligent diagnostic system with neural networks to determine genetical disorders and fetal health by using maternal serum markers. European ,Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Biology, 59 (1995) 131-136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.M.S. Beksac, Z. Odcikin, A. Egemen and U. Karakas, An intelligent diagnostic system for the assessment of gestational age based on ultrasonic fetal head measurements. Technology & Health Care, 4 (1996) 223-231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.G.S. Berkowitz, C. Blackmoreprince, R.H. Lapinski and D.A. Savitz, RISK FACTORS FOR PRETERM BIRTH SUBTYPES. Epidemiology, 9 (1998) 279-285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.C.A. Blackmore, D.A. Savitz, L.J. Edwards, S.D. Harlow and W.J. Bowes, Racial differences in the patterns of pretern~ delivery in central North Carolina, USA. Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology, 9 (1995) 281-295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.{7} R.K. Creasy, Preterm birth prevention: where are we?. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 168 (1993) 1223-1230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.{8} R.K. Creasy and M.A. Hen:on, Prevention of preterm birth. {Review} {59 refs}. Seminars in Peri,atologv, 5 (1981) 295-302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.L.D. Devoe, S. Samuel, P. Prescott and B.A. Work, redicting the duration of the first stage of spontaneous labor using a neural network, dournal of Materna{-t:~ta{ Medicine, 5 (1996) 256-261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.W.E. Feldman and B. Wood, The economic impact of highrisk pregnancies. Journal of Health Care Finance, 24 (1997) 64-71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.J.M. Garibaldi, J.A. Westgate, E.C. lfeachor and K.R. Greene, The development and implementation of an expert system for the analysis of umbilical cord blood. Art!ficiat Intelligence in Medicine, I 0 (1997) 129-144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.R.L. Goldenberg, S.P. Cliver, F.X. Mulvihill, C.A. Hickey, H.J. Hoffman, L.V. Klerman and M.J. Johnson, Medical, psychosocial, and behavioral risk factors do not explain the increased risk for low birth weight among black women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 175 (1996) 1317-1324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.R.L. Goldenberg, J.D. lams, B.M. Mercer, P.J. Meis, A.H. Moawad, R.L. Copper, A. Das, E. Thorn, F. johnson, D. McNellis, M. Miodovnik, D.P. Van, S.N. Caritis, G.R. Thumau and S.F. Bottoms, The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. American Journal of Public Health, 88 (1998) 233-238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.L. Goodwin, J. Prather, K. Schlitz, M.A. !annacchione, M. Hage, W.E. Hammond and J. Grzymala-Busse, Data mining issues for improved birth outcomes. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, 34 (I 997) 291-296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.M. Hedegaard, T.B. Henriksen, S. Sabroe and N.J. Secher, Psychological distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery. BMJ, 307 (1993) 234-239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Holbrook, R., Lares, R., and Creasy, R. Evaluation of a riskscoring system for prediction of preterm labor. American Journal of Perinatotogy 6(1 ), 62-68. 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.J.D. lares, R.L. Goldenberg, B.M. Mercer, A. Moawad, E. Thorn, P.J. Meis, D. McNellis, S.N. Caritis, M. Miodovnik, M.K. Menard, G.R. Thurnau, S.E. Bottoms and J.M. Roberts, The Preterm Prediction Study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, I78 (1998) I035-1040Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.R.D. Keith and K.R. Greene, Development, evaluation and validation of an intelligent system for the management of labour. {Review} {29 ref$}. Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 8 (1994) 583-605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.R.D. Keith, J. Westgate, E.C. Ifeachor and K.R. Greene, Suitability of artificial neural networks for feature extraction from cardiotocogram during labour. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 32 (1994) S5 t-S57Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.M.R. Kok and M.E. Boon, Consequences of neural network technology for cervical screening: increase in diagnostic consistency and positive scores. Cancer, 78 (1996) 112-t17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.S. Kol, 1. Thaler, N. Paz and O. Shmueli, Interpretation of nonstress tests by an artificial neural network. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 172 (1995) 1372-1379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.R.J. Lapeer, K.J. Dalton, R.W. Prager, J.J. Forsstrom, H.K. Selbmann and R. Derom, Application of neural networks to the ranking of perinatai variables influencing birthweight. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation ~ Supplement, 222 (1995a) 83-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.D.R. Lovell, B. Rosario, M. Niranjan, R.W. Prager, K.J. Dalton, R. Derom and J. Chalmers, Design, construction and evaluation of systems to predict risk in obstetrics. International Journal of Medical lnformatics, 46 (1997) 159-173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.M. McLean, W.A. Waiters and R. Smith, Prediction and early diagnosis of preterm labor: a critical review. {Review} {96 refs} Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 48 (t993) 209-225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23.March of Dimes http://www~modimes, org/stats/preterm.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.P.J. Meis, R.L. Goldenberg, B.M. Mercer, J.D. lams, A.H. Moawad, M. Miodovnik, M.K. Menard, S.N. Caritis, G.R. Thumau, S.F. Bottoms, A. Das, J.M. Roberts and D. McNellis, The preteml prediction study: risk factors for indicated preterm births. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. American Journal of' Obstetrics & Gynecology, 178 (1998) 562-567.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.D.M. Paige, M. Augustyn, W.K. Adih, F. Witter and J. Chang, Bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth: a comprehensive review of the literature. {Review} {8I refs}. dournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 43 (1998) 83-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.J.L. Peacock, J.M. Bland and H.R, Anderson, Pmterm delivery: effects of socioeconomic fhctors, psychological stress, smoking, alcohol, and caffeine. BMd, 3tl (1995) 53t-535.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.{45} J.C. Prather, D.F, Lobach, L.K. Goodwin, J.W. Hales, M.L. Hage and W.E. Hammond, Medical data mining: knowledge discovery in a clinical data warehouse. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, (1997) i 01- 105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.J.C. Prather, D.F. Lobach, J.W. Hales, M.L. Hage, S.J. Fehrs and W.E. Hammond, Converting a legacy system database into relational format to enhance query efficiency. Proceedings - the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, (1995) 372-376.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.P.H. Shiono and M.A. Klebanoff, A review of risk scoring for preterm birth. {Review} {41 refs}. Clinics in Perinatology, 20 (1993) 107-125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.S. Snowden, K.G. Brownlee and P.R. Dear, An expert system to assist neonatal intensive care. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 2 t (1997) 67-73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.R.J. Sokol and L, Chik, A prototype system for perinatal knowledge engineering using an artificial intelligence tool. Journal of ?erinatal Medicine, 16 (1988) 273-281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.L.K. Woolery, Clinical knowledge base development tbr preterm-birth risk assessmem. Applied Nursing Research, 7 (1994) 141-144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. 33.L.K. Woolery and J. Grzymala-Busse, Machine learning for an expert system to predict preterm birth risk. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, t (1994) 439- 446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.L.K. Woolery and J. Grzymala-Busse, Machine learning for development of an expert system to predict premature birth. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, S 1 (1995) 29-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Data mining for preterm birth prediction

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SAC '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM symposium on Applied computing - Volume 1
            March 2000
            536 pages
            ISBN:1581132409
            DOI:10.1145/335603

            Copyright © 2000 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 19 March 2000

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader