skip to main content
research-article

Designing an AI Health Coach and Studying Its Utility in Promoting Regular Aerobic Exercise

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 May 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Our research aims to develop interactive, social agents that can coach people to learn new tasks, skills, and habits. In this article, we focus on coaching sedentary, overweight individuals (i.e., “trainees”) to exercise regularly. We employ adaptive goal setting in which the intelligent health coach generates, tracks, and revises personalized exercise goals for a trainee. The goals become incrementally more difficult as the trainee progresses through the training program. Our approach is model-based—the coach maintains a parameterized model of the trainee’s aerobic capability that drives its expectation of the trainee’s performance. The model is continually revised based on trainee-coach interactions. The coach is embodied in a smartphone application, NutriWalking, which serves as a medium for coach-trainee interaction. We adopt a task-centric evaluation approach for studying the utility of the proposed algorithm in promoting regular aerobic exercise. We show that our approach can adapt the trainee program not only to several trainees with different capabilities but also to how a trainee’s capability improves as they begin to exercise more. Experts rate the goals selected by the coach better than other plausible goals, demonstrating that our approach is consistent with clinical recommendations. Further, in a 6-week observational study with sedentary participants, we show that the proposed approach helps increase exercise volume performed each week.

References

  1. Rediet Abebe and Kira Goldner. 2018. Mechanism design for social good. AI Matters 4, 3 (2018), 27--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barbara E. Ainsworth, William L. Haskell, Stephen D. Herrmann, Nathanael Meckes, David R. Bassett Jr., Catrine Tudor-Locke, Jennifer L. Greer, Jesse Vezina, Melicia C. Whitt-Glover, and Arthur S. Leon. 2011. 2011 compendium of physical activities: A second update of codes and MET values.Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 43, 8 (2011), 1575--1581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. American College of Sports Medicine. 2013. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Lippincott Williams 8 Wilkins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Albert Bandura. 1994. Self-efficacy. Wiley Online Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariane Bélanger-Gravel, Gaston Godin, and Steve Amireault. 2013. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol. Rev. 7, 1 (2013), 23--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kathy Berra, James Rippe, and JoAnn E. Manson. 2015. Making physical activity counseling a priority in clinical practice: The time for action is now. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 314, 24 (2015), 2617--2618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. L. Booth, B. E. Ainsworth, M. Pratt, and U. Ekelund. 2003. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 35, 8 (2003), 1381--1395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gunnar Borg. 1998. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Human Kinetics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usabil. Eval. Industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Matthew Brown, Arunesh Sinha, Aaron Schlenker, and Milind Tambe. 2016. One size does not fit all: A game-theoretic approach for dynamically and effectively screening for threats. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’16). 425--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Michel C. Desmarais and Ryan S. J. de Baker. 2012. A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 22, 1--2 (2012), 9--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Elizabeth G. Eakin, Sheleigh P. Lawler, Corneel Vandelanotte, and Neville Owen. 2007. Telephone interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change a systematic review. Amer. J. Prevent. Med. 32, 5 (2007), 419--434. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Karen B. Eden, C. Tracy Orleans, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Nola J. Pender, and Steven M. Teutsch. 2002. Does counseling by clinicians improve physical activity? A summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann. Internal Med. 137, 3 (2002), 208--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Emily B. Falk, Matthew Brook O’Donnell, Christopher N. Cascio, Francis Tinney, Yoona Kang, Matthew D. Lieberman, Shelley E. Taylor, Lawrence An, Kenneth Resnicow, and Victor J. Strecher. 2015. Self-affirmation alters the brain’s response to health messages and subsequent behavior change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7 (2015), 1977--1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fei Fang, Thanh Hong Nguyen, Rob Pickles, Wai Y Lam, Gopalasamy R. Clements, Bo An, Amandeep Singh, Milind Tambe, Andrew Lemieux et al. 2016. Deploying PAWS: Field optimization of the protection assistant for wildlife security. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’16). 3966--3973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Carol Ewing Garber, Bryan Blissmer, Michael R. Deschenes, Barry A. Franklin, Michael J. Lamonte, I.-Min Lee, David C. Nieman, and David P. Swain. 2011. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 43, 7 (2011), 1334--1359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Joseph C. Giarratano and Gary D. Riley. 2005. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming. Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ana D. Goode, Marina M. Reeves, and Elizabeth G. Eakin. 2012. Telephone-delivered interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change: An updated systematic review. Amer. J. Prevent. Med. 42, 1 (2012), 81--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Andrea Hartzler, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, Shiwali Mohan, Michael Silva, Paula Lozano, James D. Ralston, Evette Ludman, Dori Rosenberg, Katherine M. Newton, Lester Nelson, and Peter Pirolli. 2016. Acceptability of a team-based mobile health (mHealth) application for lifestyle self-management in individuals with chronic illnesses. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vol. 2016. 3277--3281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Gregory W. Heath, Diana C. Parra, Olga L. Sarmiento, Lars Bo Andersen, Neville Owen, Shifalika Goenka, Felipe Montes, Ross C. Brownson, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group et al. 2012. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: Lessons from around the world. Lancet 380, 9838 (2012), 272--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Victoria Hollis, Artie Konrad, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. Change of heart: Emotion tracking to promote behavior change. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2643--2652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Marian Huhman, Ryan P. Kelly, and Timothy Edgar. 2017. Social marketing as a framework for youth physical activity initiatives: A 10-year retrospective on the legacy of CDC’s VERB campaign. Curr. Obesity Rep. 6, 2 (2017), 101--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. Jette, K. Sidney, and G. Blümchen. 1990. Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity. Clin. Cardiol. 13, 8 (1990), 555--565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Emily B. Kahn, Leigh T. Ramsey, Ross C. Brownson, Gregory W. Heath, Elizabeth H. Howze, Kenneth E. Powell, Elaine J. Stone, Mummy W. Rajab, and Phaedra Corso. 2002. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Amer. J. Prevent. Med. 22, 4 (2002), 73--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Subbarao Khambapati. 2018. Challenges of Human-Aware AI Systems. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb7CWilXjag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Artie Konrad, Victoria Bellotti, Nicole Crenshaw, Simon Tucker, Les Nelson, Honglu Du, Peter Pirolli, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. Finding the adaptive sweet spot: Balancing compliance and achievement in automated stress reduction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3829--3838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pat Langley, John E. Laird, and Seth Rogers. 2009. Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cogn. Syst. Res. 10, 2 (2009), 141--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Michael L. LeFevre. 2014. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann. Internal Med. 161, 8 (2014), 587--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Christine Lisetti, Reza Amini, Ugan Yasavur, and Naphtali Rishe. 2013. I can help you change! an empathic virtual agent delivers behavior change health interventions. ACM Trans. Manage. Info. Syst. 4, 4 (2013), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psychol. 57, 9 (2002), 705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. William R. Miller and Stephen Rollnick. 2012. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Shiwali Mohan, Matthew Klenk, and Victoria Bellotti. 2019. Exploring how to personalize travel mode recommendations for urban transportation. In Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on Theory-Informed User Modeling for Tailoring and Personalizing Interfaces (HUMANIZE) in Conjunction with ACM Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shiwali Mohan, Hesham Rakha, and Matthew Klenk. 2019. Acceptable planning: Influencing individual behavior to reduce transportation energy expenditure of a city. J. Artific. Intell. Res. 66 (2019), 555--587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Shiwali Mohan, Anusha Venkatakrishnan, Michael Silva, and Peter Pirolli. 2017. On designing a social coach to promote regular aerobic exercise. In Proceedings of the Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI/AAAI’17). 4721--4727.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Inbal Nahum-Shani, Eric B. Hekler, and Donna Spruijt-Metz. 2015. Building health behavior models to guide the development of just-in-time adaptive interventions: A pragmatic framework. Health Psychol. 34, S (2015), 1209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Rachel Persinger, Carl Foster, Mark Gibson, Dennis C. W. Fater, and John P. Porcari. 2004. Consistency of the talk test for exercise prescription. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 36, 9 (2004), 1632--1636.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Charlie Pinder, Jo Vermeulen, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Russell Beale. 2018. Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 3 (2018), 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Daniel Schulman, Timothy W. Bickmore, and Candace L. Sidner. 2011. An intelligent conversational agent for promoting long-term health behavior change using motivational interviewing. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: AI and Health Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Eric Shieh, Bo An, Rong Yang, Milind Tambe, Craig Baldwin, Joseph DiRenzo, Ben Maule, and Garrett Meyer. 2012. Protect: A deployed game theoretic system to protect the ports of the united states. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mical Kay Shilts, Marcel Horowitz, and Marilyn S. Townsend. 2004. Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: A review of the literature. Amer. J. Health Promot. 19, 2 (2004), 81--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Candace L. Sidner, Timothy Bickmore, Bahador Nooraie, Charles Rich, Lazlo Ring, Mahni Shayganfar, and Laura Vardoulakis. 2018. Creating new technologies for companionable agents to support isolated older adults. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 8, 3 (2018), 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Gabrielle Lindsay Smith, Lauren Banting, Rochelle Eime, Grant O’Sullivan, and Jannique G. Z. Van Uffelen. 2017. The association between social support and physical activity in older adults: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activ. 14, 1 (2017), 56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Fiona G. Stacey, Erica L. James, Kathy Chapman, Kerry S. Courneya, and David R. Lubans. 2015. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. J. Cancer Survivor. 9, 2 (2015), 305--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. M. Stonebraker and L. A. Rowe. 1986. The design of POSTGRES. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Myrthe Tielman, Marieke van Meggelen, Mark A. Neerincx, and Willem-Paul Brinkman. 2015. An Ontology-based Question System for a Virtual Coach Assisting in Trauma Recollection. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 17--27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Robert Tobias. 2009. Changing behavior by memory aids: A social psychological model of prospective memory and habit development tested with dynamic field data.Psychol. Rev. 116, 2 (2009), 408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Thomas L. Webb, Judith Joseph, Lucy Yardley, and Susan Michie. 2010. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J. Med. Internet Res. 12, 1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Laura Weiglein, Jeffery Herrick, Stacie Kirk, and Erik P. Kirk. 2011. The 1-mile walk test is a valid predictor of VO 2max and is a reliable alternative fitness test to the 1.5-mile run in US air force males. Military Med. 176, 6 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing an AI Health Coach and Studying Its Utility in Promoting Regular Aerobic Exercise

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
                ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 10, Issue 2
                June 2020
                155 pages
                ISSN:2160-6455
                EISSN:2160-6463
                DOI:10.1145/3403610
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2020 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 30 May 2020
                • Accepted: 1 October 2019
                • Received: 1 November 2018
                Published in tiis Volume 10, Issue 2

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Research
                • Refereed

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format