Abstract
The Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries (IRCDL) is the annual Italian forum to discuss research topics on Digital Libraries and related technical, practical, and social issues. Along the years, IRCDL touched several aspects underlying the ?Digital Library" domain and promptly adapted to the evolution of the field. Today, the ?Digital Library" field includes theory and practices reflecting the evolution of the role of libraries in the scholarly communication domain, and also embracing scholarly communication and open science.
The theme of IRCDL 2019 was ?Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science". Three main reasons motivated this theme: (i) science is increasingly becoming digital, meaning that research is performed using data services and digital tools; (ii) the results of the research are no longer just traditional scientific publications; (iii) the outcomes of science are increasingly encompassing datasets, software, and experiments. As digital artifacts, such products can be shared and re-used together with the article, thus enabling comprehensive research assessment and various degrees of reproducibility of science. Positive consequences of this shift towards Open Science are: accelerating science, optimizing the cost of research, fraud detection, and fullyfledged scientific reward. Digital Libraries are central in the evolution of research outputs by targeting findability, preservation, interlinking, and re-use of research products and by integrating the components of the scholarly communication process.
The conference has been organized in Pisa, and the proceedings are published in the Springer CCIS series Vol. 988 [22]. Pre-print versions, research datasets, and research software relative to the accepted contributions are accessible via Zenodo.org.
- M. Agosti, E. Fabris, and G. Silvello. On synergies between information retrieval and digital libraries. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 3--17.Google Scholar
- A. Amelio, R. Jankovi´c, D. Taniki´c, and I. R. Draganov. Predicting the usability of the dice captcha via artificial neural network. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 44--58.Google Scholar
- S. Ammirati, D. Firmani, M. Maiorino, P. Merialdo, and E. Nieddu. In codice ratio: Machine transcription of medieval manuscripts. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 185--192.Google Scholar
- A. Bardi, V. Casarosa, and P. Manghi. Foundations of a framework for peer-reviewing the research flow. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 195--208.Google Scholar
- J. E. Beamer. Digital libraries for open science: Using a socio-technical interaction network approach. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 122--129.Google Scholar
- A. Bellotto and C. Bettella. Metadata as semantic palimpsests: The case of PHAIDRA@UNIPD. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 167--184.Google Scholar
- G. Carducci, M. Leontino, D. P. Radicioni, G. Bonino, E. Pasini, and P. Tripodi. Semantically aware text categorisation for metadata annotation. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 315--330.Google Scholar
- D. Castelli, P. Manghi, and C. Thanos. A vision towards scientific communication infrastructures - on bridging the realms of research digital libraries and scientific data centers. Int. J. on Digital Libraries, 13(3--4):155--169, 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Cozza, V. T. Hoang, M. Petrocchi, and R. De Nicola. Transparency in keyword faceted search: An investigation on google shopping. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 29--43.Google Scholar
- S. Cresci, S. Minutoli, L. Nizzoli, S. Tardelli, and M. Tesconi. Enriching digital libraries with crowdsensed data. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 144--158.Google Scholar
- S. B. Davidson, P. Buneman, D. Deutch, T. Milo, and G. Silvello. Data Citation: A Computational Challenge. In Proc. of the 36th ACM PODS 2017, pp 1--4, 2017.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Dosso, G. Setti, and G. Silvello. Learning to cite: Transfer learning for digital archives. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 97--106.Google Scholar
- S. Ferilli and S. Angelastro. Towards a process mining approach to grammar induction for digital libraries. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 291--303.Google Scholar
- M. Fontanin and P. Castellucci. Water to the thirsty reflections on the ethical mission of libraries and open access. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 61--71.Google Scholar
- T. Giannakopoulos, Y. Foufoulas, H. Dimitropoulos, and N. Manola. Interactive text analysis and information extraction. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 340--350.Google Scholar
- A. Hast, P. Cullhed, E. Vats, and M. Abrate. Making large collections of handwritten material easily accessible and searchable. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 18--28.Google Scholar
- Y. Karimova, J. A. Castro, and C. Ribeiro. Data deposit in a ckan repository: A dublin core-based simplified workflow. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 222--235.Google Scholar
- S. La Bruzzo, P. Manghi, and A. Mannocci. Openaire's doiboost - boosting crossref for research. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 133--143.Google Scholar
- M. Lana. Information literacy needs open access or: Open access is not only for researchers. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 236--247.Google Scholar
- A. Latif, T. Borst, and K. Tochtermann. Collecting and controlling distributed research information by linking to external authority data - a case study. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 331--339.Google Scholar
- D. Luzi, R. Ruggieri, and L. Pisacane. The openup pilot on research data sharing, validation and dissemination in social sciences. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 248--258.Google Scholar
- P. Manghi, L. Candela, and G. Silvello, editors. Proc. of the 15th Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries, IRCDL 2019, CCIS 988, Springer, 2019.Google Scholar
- D. Metilli, V. Bartalesi, C. Meghini, and N. Aloia. Populating narratives using wikidata events: An initial experiment. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 159--166.Google Scholar
- A. Minelli, A. Sarretta, A. Oggioni, C. Bergami, and A. Pugnetti. A practical workflow for an open scientific lifecycle project: Econaos. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 209--221.Google Scholar
- L. Pandolfo, L. Pulina, and M. Zieli´nski. Exploring semantic archival collections: The case of pi lsudski institute of america. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 107--121.Google Scholar
- M. Passon, M. Comuzzo, G. Serra, and C. Tasso. Keyphrase extraction via an attentive model. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 304--314.Google Scholar
- J. Rodrigues, J. A. Castro, J. R. da Silva, and C. Ribeiro. Hands-on data publishing with researchers: Five experiments with metadata in multiple domains. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 274--288.Google Scholar
- M. Soprano and S. Mizzaro. Crowdsourcing peer review: As we may do. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 259--273.Google Scholar
- C. Thanos and V. Casarosa. The key role of the DELOS Network of Excellence in establishing Digital Libraries as a research field in Europe. LIBEER Quarterly, 26(4):296--307, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Vezzani and G. M. Di Nunzio. Computational terminology in ehealth. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 72--85.Google Scholar
- M. Witt, S. Stall, R. Duerr, R. Plante, M. Fenner, R. Dasler, P. Cruse, S. Hou, R. Ulrich, and D. Kinkade. Connecting researchers to data repositories in the earth, space, and environmental sciences. In Manghi et al. [22], pp 86--96.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science
Comments