skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445059acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Queuing for Waste: Sociotechnical Interactions within a Food Sharing Community

Published:07 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the practices of organising face-to-face events of a volunteer-run food-sharing community in Denmark. The ethnographic fieldwork draws attention to the core values underlying the ways sharing events are organised, and how - through the work of volunteers - surplus food is transformed from a commodity to a gift. The findings illustrate the community’s activist agenda of food waste reduction, along with the volunteers’ concerns and practical labour of running events and organising the flow of attendees through various queuing mechanisms. The paper contributes to the area of Food and HCI by: i) outlining the role of queuing in organising activism and ii) reflecting on the role that values, such as collective care and commons, can play in structuring queuing at face-to-face events.

References

  1. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel, Ilona De Hooge, Pegah Amani, Tino Bech-Larsen, and Marije Oostindjer. 2015. Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability 7, 6 (2015), 6457–6477. Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Eric P.S. Baumer and M. Six Silberman. 2011. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2271–2274. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Russell Belk. 2007. Why not share rather than own?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611, 1(2007), 126–140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Genevieve Bell and Joseph Kaye. 2002. Designing technology for domestic spaces: A Kitchen Manifesto. Gastronomica: The Journal of Critical Food Studies 2, 2 (2002), 46–62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Katie Berns and Chiara Rossitto. 2019. From Commodities to Gifts: Redistributing Surplus Food Locally. In Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies, Edinburgh, Scotland, 25 October, 2019. Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies, Edinburgh, Scotland, 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Vol. Vol. 2. American Psychological Association, 750 First Street NE, Washington, 57–71. Publisher: American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry Brown, Alexandra Weilenmann, Donald McMillan, and Airi Lampinen. 2016. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, Peter Lyle, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. Happenstance, Strategies and Tactics: Intrinsic Design in a Volunteer-based Community. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971564Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. ’A Farmer, a Place and at least 20 Members’: The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-based Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bruno M. Chies. 2017. Turning Food ‘waste’ into a Commons. In Practicing the Commons. Self-Governance, Cooperation and Institutional Change. XVI Biennal IASC-Conference. https://www. iasc2017. org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/chies. pdf. Digital Library on the Commons, Utrecht, 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Winyu Chinthammit, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, and Jun Rekimoto. 2014. HCI in food product innovation. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1111–1114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559213Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jaz Hee-jeong Choi and Eli Blevis. 2010. HCI and sustainable food culture: a design framework for engagement. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries(NordiCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868931Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Conor Linehan, Rob Comber, and John McCarthy. 2012. Food for thought: designing for critical reflection on food practices. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 793–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Ciaghi and A. Villafiorita. 2016. Beyond food sharing: Supporting food waste reduction with ICTs. In 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). IEEE, Trento, Italy, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580874Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Adrian K. Clear, Kirstie O’neill, Adrian Friday, and Mike Hazas. 2016. Bearing an Open “Pandora’s Box” HCI for Reconciling Everyday Food and Sustainability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 23, 5(2016), 1–25. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rob Comber, Eva Ganglbauer, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Jettie Hoonhout, Yvonne Rogers, Kenton O’Hara, and Julie Maitland. 2012. Food and interaction design: designing for food in everyday life. In CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2767–2770. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212716Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rob Comber, Jettie Hoonhout, Aart van Halteren, Paula Moynihan, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Food practices as situated action: exploring and designing for everyday food practices with households. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2457–2466. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Foodsharing Copenhagen. 2020. Foodsharingcph.org. https://foodsharingcph.org/ Library Catalog: foodsharingcph.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design Justice: Towards an Intersectional Feminist Framework for Design Theory and Practice. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3189696. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3189696Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Anna Davies. 2019. Urban Food Sharing: Rules, Tools and Networks. Policy Press, Ireland. Google-Books-ID: 0p2RDwAAQBAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Anna R. Davies. 2014. Co-creating sustainable eating futures: Technology, ICT and citizen consumer ambivalence. Futures 62(2014), 181–193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Anna R. Davies and Robert Legg. 2018. Fare sharing: interrogating the nexus of ICT, urban food sharing, and sustainability. Food, Culture & Society 21, 2 (2018), 233–254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Foodsharing Deutschland. 2020. Lebensmittel teilen, statt wegwerfen - foodsharing Deutschland. https://foodsharing.de Library Catalog: foodsharing.de.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lynn Dombrowski, Jed R. Brubaker, Sen H. Hirano, Melissa Mazmanian, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2013. It takes a network to get dinner: designing location-based systems to address local food needs. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing(UbiComp ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Teppo Eskelinen, Tuuli Hirvilammi, and Juhana Venäläinen. 2020. Introduction: Community economies and social transformation with, within and beyond the welfare state. MAYFLYBOOKS EPHEMERA, Finland. Publisher: MayFly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. FareShare. 2020. Fighting hunger, tackling food waste in the UK. https://fareshare.org.uk/ Library Catalog: fareshare.org.uk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. FoodCloud. 2020. Feeding Kindness. https://food.cloud/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Francesca Forno and Paolo R. Graziano. 2014. Sustainable community movement organisations. Journal of Consumer Culture 14, 2 (2014), 139–157. Publisher: Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Koen Frenken and Juliet Schor. 2017. Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23 (June 2017), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Dicte Frost. 2019. Intermediate Sharing Realities: European Ecovillages. In Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies, Edinburgh, Scotland, 25 October, 2019. Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies, Edinburgh, Scotland, 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Eva Ganglbauer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Rob Comber. 2013. Negotiating food waste: Using a practice lens to inform design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 2 (May 2013), 11:1–11:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463579.2463582Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Eva Ganglbauer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Georg Molzer. 2012. Creating visibility: understanding the design space for food waste. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(MUM ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2406367.2406369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Eva Ganglbauer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Özge Subasi, and Florian Güldenpfennig. 2014. Think globally, act locally: a case study of a free food sharing community and social networking. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing(CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 911–921. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531664Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kayleigh Garthwaite. 2016. Stigma, shame and’people like us’: an ethnographic study of foodbank use in the UK. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 24, 3 (2016), 277–289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Gibson-Graham, Stephen Healy, and Jenny Cameron. 2016. Commoning as a postcapitalist politics 1. Routledge, 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673172-12 Pages: 192-212 Publication Title: Releasing the Commons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Julie Katherine Gibson-Graham. 1997. The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Capital & Class 21, 2 (1997), 186–188. Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. J. K. Gibson-Graham, Jenny Cameron, and Stephen Healy. 2013. Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. University of Minnesota Press, University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2520. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt32bcgjGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Too Good To Go. 2020. Waste Warriors fighting food waste together. https://toogoodtogo.com/en-us Library Catalog: toogoodtogo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Erving Goffman. 1956. Embarrassment and Social Organization. Amer. J. Sociology 62, 3 (1956), 264–271. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2772920 Publisher: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Catherine Grevet, Anthony Tang, and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2012. Eating alone, together: new forms of commensality. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work(GROUP ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/2389176.2389192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mary Griffin, Jeffery Sobal, and Thomas A. Lyson. 2009. An analysis of a community food waste stream. Agriculture and Human Values 26, 1-2 (2009), 67–81. Publisher: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Andrea Grimes and Richard Harper. 2008. Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357130Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Jenny Gustavsson, Christel Cederberg, and Ulf Sonesson. 2011. Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention ; study conducted for the International Congress Save Food! at Interpack 2011, [16 - 17 May], Düsseldorf, Germany. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Isa Hardemo. 2006. On the practice of queuing and new forms of interaction. PhD Thesis. Blekinge Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Garrett Hardin. 1998. Extensions of “The tragedy of the commons”. Science 280, 5364 (1998), 682–683. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Rob Comber. 2018. Connected seeds and sensors: co-designing internet of things for sustainable smart cities with urban food-growing communities. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2(PDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210620Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Rob Comber. 2019. The Right to the Sustainable Smart City. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2013. Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration(OzCHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Tapio Ikkala and Airi Lampinen. 2015. Monetizing Network Hospitality: Hospitality and Sociability in the Context of Airbnb. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675274Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Blomberg J, Burrel M, and Guest G. 2003. ”An Ethnographic Approach to Design.” In The Human Computer Interaction Handbook - Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications.L. Erlbaum (Ed): Lawrence Erlbaum., 365 Broadway Hillsdale, NJUnited States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Karma. 2020. Save food from being wasted. https://karma.life/ Library Catalog: karma.life.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Stacey Kuznetsov, William Odom, Vicki Moulder, Carl DiSalvo, Tad Hirsch, Ron Wakkary, and Eric Paulos. 2011. HCI, politics and the city: engaging with urban grassroots movements for reflection and action. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2409–2412. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Airi Lampinen and Coye Cheshire. 2016. Hosting via Airbnb: Motivations and Financial Assurances in Monetized Network Hospitality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1669–1680. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Airi Lampinen, Moira McGregor, Rob Comber, and Barry Brown. 2018. Member-Owned Alternatives: Exploring Participatory Forms of Organising with Cooperatives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 1–19. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Airi M I Lampinen. 2014. Account sharing in the context of networked hospitality exchange. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing(CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Cheryl Lans. 2016. Worldwide Opportunities on Organic Farms (WWOOF) as part of the existing care economy in Canada. Geoforum 75(2016), 16–19. Publisher: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. E. Laurier, A. Whyte, and K. Buckner. 2001. An ethnography of a neighbourhood café: informality, table arrangements and background noise. Journal of Mundane Behaviour 2, 2 (June 2001), 195–232. http://mundanebehavior.org/issues/v2n2/laurier.htm Number: 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2016. Designing Publics(1st ed.). The MIT Press, 1 Rogers Street in Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Tania Lewis. 2018. Digital food: from paddock to platform. Communication Research and Practice 4, 3 (2018), 212–228. Publisher: Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Ann Light. 2019. Talking about Collaborative Economies: Platforms, Trust and Ethnographic Methods–Keynote Talk. In Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies, Edinburgh, Scotland, 25 October, 2019. Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies, Edinburgh, Scotland, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Eric Livingston. 1987. Making sense of ethnomethodology. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London ; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Antipode Foundation Ltd. 2019. Community Economy: Community Economies Collective. In Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119558071.ch10 Section: 10 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781119558071.ch10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Paul Luff and Christian Heath. 1998. Mobility in collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work(CSCW ’98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/289444.289505Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Ezio Manzini and Rachel Coad. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt17kk7svGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanna Marttila, Andrea Botero, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2014. Towards commons design in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2(PDC ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2015. Taking [a] part: the politics and aesthetics of participation in experience-centered design. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Duncan McLaren and Julian Agyeman. 2015. Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. https://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029728.001.0001/upso-9780262029728 Publication Title: Sharing Cities.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Ethan Miller. 2013. Community economy: Ontology, ethics, and politics for radically democratic economic organizing. Rethinking Marxism 25, 4 (2013), 518–533. Publisher: Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Oona Morrow. 2020. Gleaning: transactions at the nexus of food, commons and waste. In Chapters. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 206–213. https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/18372_22.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Christina Neumayer and Celina Raffl. 2008. Facebook for global protest: The potential and limits of social software for grassroots activism. In Proceedings of the 5th Prato Community Informatics & Development Informatics Conference, Vol. 5. Community Informatics & Development Informatics Conference, Monash Centre, Prato, Italy, 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Daniel Normark. 2006. Tending to mobility: intensities of staying at the petrol station. Environment and Planning A 38, 2 (2006), 241–252. Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Maria Normark and Jakob Tholander. 2014. Performativity in sustainable interaction: the case of seasonal grocery shopping in ecofriends. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557318Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Juliet Norton, Nico Herbig, Lynn Dombrowski, Ankita Raturi, Bonnie Nardi, Sebastian Prost, Samantha McDonald, Daniel Pargman, Oliver Bates, Maria Normark, and Bill Tomlinson. 2017. A grand challenge for HCI: food + sustainability. interactions 24, 6 (Oct. 2017), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137095Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. OLIO. 2020. Share more. Waste less.https://olioex.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Elinor Ostrom. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Semih Otles, Stella Despoudi, Camelia Bucatariu, and Canan Kartal. 2015. Chapter 1 - Food waste management, valorization, and sustainability in the food industry. In Food Waste Recovery, Charis M. Galanakis (Ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800351-0.00001-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Julian Parfitt, Mark Barthel, and Sarah Macnaughton. 2010. Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: biological sciences 365, 1554 (2010), 3065–3081. Publisher: The Royal Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Nassim Parvin and Anne Pollock. 2020. Unintended by Design: On the Political Uses of “Unintended Consequences”. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6 (2020), 320–327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Joanna Penn, Journalist’s Resource June 3, and 2016. 2016. Uber, Airbnb and consequences of the sharing economy: Research roundup. https://journalistsresource.org/studies/economics/business/airbnb-lyft-uber-bike-share-sharing-economy-research-roundup/ Library Catalog: journalistsresource.org Section: Business.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Sebastian Prost, Clara Crivellaro, Andy Haddon, and Rob Comber. 2018. Food Democracy in the Making: Designing with Local Food Networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173907Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Sebastian Prost, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Jane Midgley, Graeme Heron, Kahina Meziant, and Clara Crivellaro. 2019. Infrastructuring Food Democracy: The Formation of a Local Food Hub in the Context of Socio-Economic Deprivation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–27. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Kingsley Purdam, Elisabeth A. Garratt, and Aneez Esmail. 2016. Hungry? Food insecurity, social stigma and embarrassment in the UK. Sociology 50, 6 (2016), 1072–1088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Ankita Raturi, Juliet Norton, Bill Tomlinson, Eli Blevis, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. Designing Sustainable Food Systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027075Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. John Restakis. 2010. Humanizing the Economy: Co-operatives in the Age of Capital. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC Canada, V0R 1X0. Google-Books-ID: m2CdGO_CCe8C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Gerda Roelvink, Katherine Gibson, and Julie Graham. 2009. A postcapitalist politics of dwelling: ecological humanities and community economies in conversation. Australian Humanities Review 46 (May 2009), 14. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/10440/939 Accepted: 2009-10-18T23:07:15Z Last Modified: 2020-05-19 Publisher: ANU ePress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Chiara Rossitto, Cristian Bogdan, and Kerstin Severinson-Eklundh. 2014. Understanding constellations of technologies in use in a collaborative nomadic setting. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 23, 2 (2014), 137–161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Chiara Rossitto and Airi Lampinen. 2018. Co-creating the Workplace: Participatory efforts to enable individual work at the Hoffice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3-6 (2018), 947–982. Publisher: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Michael J. Sandel. 2000. What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. Tanner Lectures on Human Values 21 (2000), 87–122. Publisher: University of Utah Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Juliet Schor. 2016. Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4, 3 (2016), 7–22. Publisher: Addleton Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Jocelyn Spence. 2019. Inalienability: Understanding Digital Gifts. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Elwys De Stefani and Lorenza Mondada. 2018. Encounters in Public Space: How Acquainted Versus Unacquainted Persons Establish Social and Spatial Arrangements. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51, 3 (July 2018), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485230 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah E. Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, Stephen R. Carpenter, Wim De Vries, and Cynthia A. De Wit. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 6223 (2015), 1259855.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Lucy Suchman. 1995. Making work visible. Commun. ACM 38, 9 (1995), 56–64. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Arun Sundararajan. 2016. The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1c2cqh3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Åsa Svenfelt and Jorge Luis Zapico. 2016. Sustainable food systems with ICT. In Smart and Sustainable. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.2991/ict4s-16.2016.23 ISSN: 2352-538X.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Alex S. Taylor and Richard Harper. 2002. Age-old practices in the ’new world’: a study of gift-giving between teenage mobile phone users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503455Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Maurizio Teli. 2015. Computing and the common: hints of a new utopia in participatory design. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives(CA ’15). Aarhus University Press, Aarhus N, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Maurizio Teli, Angela Di Fiore, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2016. Computing and the common: an empirical case of participatory design today. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1(PDC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2940299.2940312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Jakob Tholander, Anna Ståhl, Mattias Jacobsson, Lisen Schultz, Sara Borgström, Maria Normark, and Elsa Kosmack-Vaara. 2012. But i don’t trust my friends: ecofriends – an application for reflective grocery shopping. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services(MobileHCI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371596Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, United States. Google-Books-ID: tLlKCAAAQBAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. José Luis Vivero-Pol. 2017. Food as commons or commodity? Exploring the links between normative valuations and agency in food transition. Sustainability 9, 3 (2017), 442. Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Dhaval Vyas, Stephen Snow, and Miranda Mallett. 2015. More than just Food: Field Visits to an Emergency Relief Centre. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction(OzCHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 662–666. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838787Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Queuing for Waste: Sociotechnical Interactions within a Food Sharing Community
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2021
      10862 pages
      ISBN:9781450380966
      DOI:10.1145/3411764

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format