Nili Steinfeld
ABSTRACT
Digital inequality has been intensively studied in recent decades, due to the considerable social significance of this phenomenon. Research has struggled with finding quality and profound ways to measure digital literacy of people from different social groups, due to the dynamic character of digital technology, which results in ever-changing, nuanced types of digital inequality. This study proposes an innovative method for examining how users approach and accomplish digital tasks by introducing eye tracking for measuring user scan patterns, gaze and attention during completion of tasks. Eye tracking as a measurement of attention and focus reflects the processes that occur while users are performing required tasks, and therefore may be a useful tool to comprehend digital literacy. We apply this innovative methodology in a repeated measures observation study of digital skills of low-skilled participants in a computer introductory course. 19 participants were requested to perform several online tasks before and after completing the course. The paper describes the results, which demonstrate that although participants’ skills have improved, the improvement is manifest in basic, trivial uses, while advance uses, such as understanding of efficient searching, or using the Internet in sophisticated ways as an environmental resource supporting one's situational awareness, are only slightly improved, as data based on tracking user gaze and mouse movements reveals.
Supplemental Material
- Bhanu Bhakta Acharya. 2017. Conceptual evolution of the digital divide: A systematic review of the literature over a period of five years (2010 – 2015). Journal of Russian Media & Journalism Studies, 41-74.Google Scholar
- Monica Anderson and John B. Horrigan. 2016. Smartphones help those without broadband get online, but don't necessarily bridge the digital divide. PEW Internet Research Center.Google Scholar
- Selami Aydin. 2012. A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60 6 , (June 2012), 1093-1106.Google Scholar
- Laurence Baker, Todd H. Wagner, Sara Singer and Bundorf, M.K. 2003. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 2400–2406.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yochai Benkler. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press. New Haven, CT.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Manuel Castells. 2002. The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephen Coleman and Jay G. Blumler. 2009. The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Daniela Di Gianatonio. 2018. The journey to digital equality: Siteimprove and the UN's sustainable development Goals. Retrieved: https://siteimprove.com/en-gb/blog/the-journey-to-digital-equality-siteimprove-and-the-un-s-sustainable-development-goals/Google Scholar
- Paul DiMaggio, Eszter Hargittai, Coral Celeste and Steven Shafer. 2004. Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In: Kathryn Neckerman, (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355-400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Paul DiMaggio and Bart Bonikowsky. 2008. Make money surfing the web? The impact of Internet use on the earnings of US worker. American Sociological Review, 73, 2 (April 2008), 227–250.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Soussan Djamasbi, Maria Siegel and Tom Tullis. 2010. Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 68, 5 (May 2010), 307-323.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matias Dodel and Gustavo Mesch. 2018. Inequality in digital skills and the adoption of online safety behaviors. Information, Communication & Society 21, 5 (February 2018), 712-728.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew S. Eastin and Robert LaRose. 2000. Internet self‐efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6, 1 (September 2000).Google Scholar
- Claudia Ehmke and Stephanie Wilson. 2007. Identifying web usability problems fromeye-tracking data. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but not as we know it-Volume 1, 119-128.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mica R. Endsley and Debra G. Jones .2016. Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design. CRC press. Boca Raton, USA.Google Scholar
- Yoram Eshet-Alkalai and Yair Amichai-Hamburger. 2004. Experiments in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 4 (September 2004), 421–429.Google Scholar
- Gunther Eysenbach. 2003. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. Ca: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 53, 6 (November 2003), 356– 371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steven Fraiberg. 2017. Start-up nation: Studying transnational entrepreneurial practices in Israel's start-up ecosystem. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 31, 3 (April 2017), 350-388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yael Fisher and Orit Bandes-Jacob. 2003. Tsimtsum Hapaar Hadigitali BeIsrael- Proyect Lehava Doch mesacem. Henrietta Szold Institute. Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
- Asmaa Ganayem. 2018. Hainternet Bahevra Haaravit BeIsrael. Igud Hainternet HaIsraeli, available at: https://cdn.the7eye.org.il/uploads/2018/10/internet-arab-society.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Eszter Hargittai. 2002. Beyond logs and surveys: In‐depth measures of people's web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 53, 14 (December 2002), 1239-1244.Google Scholar
- Eszter Hargittai. 2003. The digital divide and what to do about it. In: D. C. Jones, (Ed.), New economy handbook (pp. 822-841). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Martin Hilbert. 2011. The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 8 (September 2011), 715-736.Google Scholar
- Khan, M. Laeeq, Howard T. Welser, Claudia Cisneros, Gaone Manatong and Ika Karlina Idris. 2020. Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: Understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telematics and Informatics, 50 (July 2020).Google Scholar
- Lee Kahner, Gilad Malach and Maya Hoshen. 2017. Shnaton Hahevra Hacharedit Beisrael, Israel Democracy Institute. Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
- Seok Kang and Sherice Gearhart. 2010. E-government and civic engagement: How is citizens' use of city web sites related with civic involvement and political behaviors? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 54, 3(August 2010), 443-462.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreas M. Kaplan and Michael Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizon, 53, 1(February 2010), 59-68.Google Scholar
- Christos Katsanos, Nikolaos Tselios and Nikolaos Avouris. 2010. Evaluating website navigability: validation of a tool-based approach through two eye-tracking user studies. New review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 16, 1-2 (March 2010), 195-214.Google Scholar
- Sabina Lissitsa and Azi Lev-On. 2014. Gaps close, gaps open: A repeated cross-sectional study of the scope and determinants of the ethnic digital divide. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7, 1, 56–71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sabina Lissitsa. 2015. Patterns of digital uses among Israeli Arabs: Between citizenship in modern society and traditional cultural roots. Asian Journal of Communication, 25, 5, 447-464.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eden Litt. 2013. Measuring users’ internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society, 15, 4 (May 2013), 612-630.Google Scholar
- Han-Chin Liu, Meng-lung Lai and Hsueh-Hua Chuang. 2011. Using eye-tracking technology to investigate the redundant effect of multimedia web pages on viewers' cognitive processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 6 (November 2011), 2410-2417.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sonia Livingstone. 2008. Internet literacy: Young people's negotiation of new online opportunities. In: McPherson, T. (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected (pp. 101-122). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sonia Livingstone and Ellen Helsper. 2007. Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 4 (August 2007) 671–696.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mary Madden and Lee Rainie. 2003. America's online pursuits: The changing picture of who's online and what they do. PEW Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
- Gustavo Mesch, Ilan Talmud and Tanya Kolobov. 2013. 14 Explaining digital inequalities in israel. The Digital Divide (2013): 222.Google Scholar
- Gustavo Mesch, Rita Mano and Judith Tsamir. 2012. Minority status and health information search: A test of the diversification hypothesis. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 5(September 2012), 854-858.Google Scholar
- Michal Mičík and Hana Kunešová. 2020. Using an eye tracker to optimise career websites as a communication channel with Generation Y. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-24.Google Scholar
- Efrat Neter and Esther Brainin. 2012. eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. Journal of medical Internet research, 14, 1(January 2012).Google Scholar
- Pippa Norris. 2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hun M. Park and James L. Perry. 2008. Does Internet use really facilitate civic engagement? Empirical evidences from the American National Election Studies. In: E. Bergrud, & K. Yang (Eds.), Civic engagement in a networked society (pp. 237-270). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Yong Jin Park. 2015. My whole world's in my palm! The second-level divide of teenagers’ mobile use and skill. New media & society, 17, 6, 977-995.Google Scholar
- Katy E. Pearce and Ronald E. Rice. 2013. Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer Internet users. Journal of Communication, 63, 4, 721-744.Google Scholar
- Katy E. Pearce and Ronald E. Rice. 2017. Somewhat separate and unequal: digital divides, social networking sites, and capital-enhancing activities. Social Media+ Society, 3, 2 (June 2017).Google Scholar
- Alex Poole and Linden J. Ball. 2006. Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, 1, 211-219.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simon J. Purdy. 2017. Internet use and civic engagement: A structural equation approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 71 (June 2017), 318-326.Google Scholar
- Keith Rayner. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 62, 8 (August 2009), 1457-1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461Google Scholar
- Dennis Rosenberg. 2020. Immigrants’ disadvantage online: understanding the effects of immigration status, gender, and country of origin on the e-government use in Israel. Digital Policy, Regulation and GovernanceGoogle Scholar
- Aaron W. Smith, Kay L. Schlozman, Sidney Verba and Henry Brady. 2009. The Internet and Civic Engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Stuart Soroka, Patrick Fournier, Lilach Nir and John Hibbing. 2018. Psychophysiology in the Study of Political Communication: An Expository Study of Individual-Level Variation in Negativity Biases. Political Communication, 36, 2, 288-302.Google Scholar
- Brian H. Spitzberg. 2006. Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer‐mediated communication (CMC) competence. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11, 2 (January 2006), 629-666.Google Scholar
- Nili Steinfeld. 2016. “I agree to the terms and conditions”: (How) do users read privacy policies online? An eye-tracking experiment. Computers in human behavior, 55, 2 (February 2016), 992-1000.Google Scholar
- Nili Steinfeld and Ohad Shaked. (in print). Looking my (Enemy?) in the Eyes: An eye tracking study of Simulated Virtual Intergroup Contact. Media, War and Conflict.Google Scholar
- Nili Steinfeld, Tal Samuel-Azran and Azi Lev-On. 2016. User comments and opinion formation: Findings from an eye-tracking experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 61 (August 2016), 63-72.Google Scholar
- Jan Van Dijk. 2005. The network society: Social aspects of the new media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Jan van Dijk. 2012. The evolution of the digital divide: The digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In: J. Bus, M. Crompton, M. Hildebrandt, & G. Metakides, (Eds.), Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2012 (pp. 57-78).Google Scholar
- Jan van Dijk and Alexander van Deursen. 2010. Traditional media skills and digital media skills: Much of a difference. In: 60th Annual International Communication Association (ICA) Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Sara Vieweg, Amanda L. Hughes, Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2010. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1079-1088). New York: ACM.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gila Zelka. 2012. Tsimtsum Hapaar Hadigitali Bekerev Uchlusiot Muchlashot BeIsrael, Teaching and learning in the Internet age, 14, 101-13.Google Scholar
- Sheila Zimic. 2009. Not so ‘techno-savvy’: Challenging the stereotypical images of the ‘Net generation’. Digital Culture & Education, 1, 2, 129-144.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs
AbstractWe identify three conceptions of digital literacy development populating the literature: digital natives, skill-based, and sociocultural perspectives. We adopt a qualitative approach to examine pre-service teachers' beliefs about ...
Highlights- Pre-service teachers' beliefs about digital literacy development are investigated in reference to the extant literature.
Towards Practice-oriented Framework for Digital Inequality in Smart Cities
C&T '23: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Communities and TechnologiesDigital equality, entailing access to the Internet and digital devices as well as a set of diverse digital skills, has been recognized as a crucial factor in the creation of just and sustainable smart cities. However, there remains gaps between smart ...
Digital Literacy Education for the Development of Digital Literacy
The primary purpose of this study is to examine the effect of digital literacy education (DLE) on the development of digital literacy through a local digital technology community center, particularly for those with a lack of digital literacy. This study ...
Comments