skip to main content
10.1145/345508.345574acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Question-answering by predictive annotation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a new technique for question answering called Predictive Annotation. Predictive Annotation identifies potential answers to questions in text, annotates them accordingly and indexes them. This technique, along with a complementary analysis of questions, passage-level ranking and answer selection, produces a system effective at answering natural-language fact-seeking questions posed against large document collections. Experimental results show the effects of different parameter settings and lead to a number of general observations about the question-answering problem.

References

  1. 1.AAAI Fall Symposium on Question Answering, North Falmouth, MA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.R. Byrd and Y. Ravin. "Identifying and Extracting Relations in Text", Proceedings of NLDB 99, Klagenfurt, Austria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.V. Chaudhri and R. Fikes. Question answering systems: Papers from the 1999 AAAI fall symposium. Technical Report FS-99-02, AAAI Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.F.J. Damerau. Problems and some solutions in customization of natural language database front ends. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 3(2):165-184, Apr. 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.D. Harman and E. Voorhees, editors. The Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), Gaithersburg, MD, 2000. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.D. Hawking, N. Craswell, and P. Thistlewaite. Overview of TREC-7 very large collection track. In D. K. Harman and E. M. Voorhees, editors, The Seventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7), pages 91-104, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.V. A. Kulyukin, K.J. Hammond, and R.D. Burke. "Answering Questions for an Organization Online", Proceedings of AAAI'98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.J. Kupiec. "Murax: A Robust Linguistic Approach for Question Answering Using an On-line Encyclopaedia", Proceedings of SIGIR'93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.G. Miller. "WordNet: A Lexical Database for English", Communications of the ACM 38(11) pp 39- 41, 1995 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Proc. of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), November 1995, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.E. Rosch et al. "Basic Objects in Natural Categories", Cognitive Psychology 8, 382-439, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.G. Salton and M.J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.R. Sfihari and W. Li. "Question Answering Supported by Information Extraction", Proceedings of TREC8, Gaithersburg, Md., 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.TREC Q&A Evaluation official Web site: http://www.research.att.com/~singhal/qatrack.htrnlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.E. Turban and J. Aronson. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Prentice Hall, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.E. Voorhees. "Query Expansion using Lexical- Semantic Relations", Proceedings ofSIGIR'94, 61- 69. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.N. Wacholder, Y. Ravin and M. Choi. "Disarnbiguation of Proper Names in Text", Proceedings ofANLP'97. Washington, DC, April 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.I.H. Witten, A. Moffat, and T.C. Bell. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.E.W. Brown and H.A. Chong. The Guru System in TREC-6. Proceedings of TREC6, Gaithersburg, MD, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.J.M. Prager, D. Radev, E.W. Brown and A.R. Coden. "The Use of Predictive Annotation for Question-Answering in TREC8", Proceedings of TREC8, Gaithersburg, MD., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.D. Radev, J.M., Prager and V. Saran. "Ranking Suspected Answers to Natural Language Questions using Predictive Annotation", to be published in Proceedings of ANLP'O0, Seattle, WA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Question-answering by predictive annotation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGIR '00: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
            July 2000
            396 pages
            ISBN:1581132263
            DOI:10.1145/345508

            Copyright © 2000 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 2000

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader