Yuhan Luo
Young-Ho Kim
ABSTRACT
The factors influencing people’s food decisions, such as one’s mood and eating environment, are important information to foster self-reflection and to develop personalized healthy diet. But, it is difficult to consistently collect them due to the heavy data capture burden. In this work, we examine how speech input supports capturing everyday food practice through a week-long data collection study (N = 11). We deployed FoodScrap, a speech-based food journaling app that allows people to capture food components, preparation methods, and food decisions. Using speech input, participants detailed their meal ingredients and elaborated their food decisions by describing the eating moments, explaining their eating strategy, and assessing their food practice. Participants recognized that speech input facilitated self-reflection, but expressed concerns around re-recording, mental load, social constraints, and privacy. We discuss how speech input can support low-burden and reflective food journaling and opportunities for effectively processing and presenting large amounts of speech data.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Mohd Khanapi Abd Ghani and Ika Novita Dewi. 2012. Comparing speech recognition and text writing in recording patient health records. In 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. IEEE, 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECBES.2012.6498100Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Susan Albers. 2012. Eating mindfully: How to end mindless eating and enjoy a balanced relationship with food. New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
- Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Samvid Jhaveri, Rosa Lutz, Katherine Isbister, and Danielle Wilde. 2019. Making sense of human-food interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300908Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amazon.com, Inc.2021. Amazon Alexa. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://www.amazon.com/b?node=21576558011Google Scholar
- Norman Azah Anir, Hairul Nizam, and Azmi Masliyana. 2008. The users perceptions and opportunities in Malaysia in introducing RFID system for Halal food tracking. WSEAS Transactions on information science and applications 5, 5(2008), 843–852.Google Scholar
- Apple, Inc.2021. Siri. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://www.apple.com/siri/Google Scholar
- Gastón Ares, Franco Mawad, Ana Giménez, and Alejandro Maiche. 2014. Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels. Food Quality and Preference 31 (2014), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.07.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Els Bilman, Ellen van Kleef, and Hans van Trijp. 2017. External cues challenging the internal appetite control system—overview and practical implications. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 57, 13(2017), 2825–2834. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1073140Google Scholar
- Johnna Blair, Yuhan Luo, Ning F Ma, Sooyeon Lee, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2018. OneNote Meal: A photo-based diary study for reflective meal tracking. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 2018. American Medical Informatics Association, 252. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371351/Google Scholar
- Marcela CC Bomfim, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Lennart E Nacke, and James R Wallace. 2020. Food literacy while shopping: Motivating informed food purchasing behaviour with a situated gameful app. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376801Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Lora E Burke, Melanie Warziski, Terry Starrett, Jina Choo, Edvin Music, Susan Sereika, Susan Stark, and Mary Ann Sevick. 2005. Self-monitoring dietary intake: current and future practices. Journal of Renal Nutrition 15, 3 (2005), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrn.2005.04.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbara L Chalfonte, Robert S Fish, and Robert E Kraut. 1991. Expressive richness: a comparison of speech and text as media for revision. In Proceedings of the 1991 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108848Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Matthew Kay, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A Kientz. 2015. SleepTight: low-burden, self-monitoring technology for capturing and reflecting on sleep behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804266Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, and m.c. schraefel. 2015. Characterizing visualization insights from quantified selfers’ personal data presentations. IEEE computer graphics and applications 35, 4 (2015), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2015.51Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding self-reflection: how people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154881Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chia-Fang Chung, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Sonali Mishra, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2017. When personal tracking becomes social: Examining the use of Instagram for healthy eating. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems. 1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025747Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chia-Fang Chung, Qiaosi Wang, Jessica Schroeder, Allison Cole, Jasmine Zia, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2019. Identifying and planning for individualized change: patient-provider collaboration using lightweight food diaries in healthy eating and irritable bowel syndrome. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 3, 1 (2019), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314394Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leigh Clark, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Emer Gilmartin, Stephan Schlögl, Jens Edlund, Matthew Aylett, João Cabral, Cosmin Munteanu, Justin Edwards, 2019. The state of speech in HCI: Trends, themes and challenges. Interacting with Computers 31, 4 (2019), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz016Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deborah A Cohen and Susan H Babey. 2012. Contextual influences on eating behaviours: heuristic processing and dietary choices. Obesity Reviews 13, 9 (2012), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01001.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Frederick G Conrad, Michael F Schober, Christopher Antoun, H Yanna Yan, Andrew L Hupp, Michael Johnston, Patrick Ehlen, Lucas Vickers, and Chan Zhang. 2017. Respondent mode choice in a smartphone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 81, S1 (2017), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw097Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sunny Consolvo, David W McDonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In Proceedings of the 2008 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1797–1806. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357335Google ScholarDigital Library
- Felicia Cordeiro, Elizabeth Bales, Erin Cherry, and James Fogarty. 2015. Rethinking the mobile food journal: Exploring opportunities for lightweight photo-based capture. In Proceedings of the 2015 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3207–3216. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702154Google ScholarDigital Library
- Felicia Cordeiro, Daniel A Epstein, Edison Thomaz, Elizabeth Bales, Arvind K Jagannathan, Gregory D Abowd, and James Fogarty. 2015. Barriers and negative nudges: Exploring challenges in food journaling. In Proceedings of the 2015 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1159–1162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702155Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marika De Bruijne and Arnaud Wijnant. 2013. Comparing survey results obtained via mobile devices and computers: An experiment with a mobile web survey on a heterogeneous group of mobile devices versus a computer-assisted web survey. Social Science Computer Review 31, 4 (2013), 482–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313483976Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yaron D Derman, Tamara Arenovich, and John Strauss. 2010. Speech recognition software and electronic psychiatric progress notes: physicians’ ratings and preferences. BMC medical informatics and decision making 10, 1 (2010), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1497185.1497286Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel PW Ellis and Keansub Lee. 2004. Minimal-impact audio-based personal archives. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Continuous archival and retrieval of personal experiences. 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/1026653.1026659Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Elizabeth Bales, James Fogarty, and Sean Munson. 2014. Taming data complexity in lifelogs: exploring visual cuts of personal informatics data. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598558Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clayton Feustel, Shyamak Aggarwal, Bongshin Lee, and Lauren Wilcox. 2018. People like me: Designing for reflection on aggregate cohort data in personal informatics systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (2018), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264917Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rowanne Fleck and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2010. Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction. 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952269Google ScholarDigital Library
- Genesant Technologies, Inc.2021. Talk-to-Track. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://www.talktotrack.com/Google Scholar
- Google, Inc.2021. Google Assistant. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://assistant.google.com/Google Scholar
- Mette Holst, Tina Beermann, Marie Nerup Mortensen, Lotte Boa Skadhauge, Marianne Køhler, Karen Lindorff-Larsen, and Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen. 2017. Optimizing protein and energy intake in hospitals by improving individualized meal serving, hosting and the eating environment. Nutrition 34(2017), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2016.05.011Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amy Leung Hui, Gustaaf Sevenhuysen, Dexter Harvey, and Elizabeth Salamon. 2014. Barriers and coping strategies of women with gestational diabetes to follow dietary advice. Women and Birth 27, 4 (2014), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2014.07.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jisu Jung, Lyndal Wellard-Cole, Colin Cai, Irena Koprinska, Kalina Yacef, Margaret Allman-Farinelli, and Judy Kay. 2020. Foundations for systematic evaluation and benchmarking of a mobile food logger in a large-scale nutrition study. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 2 (2020), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397327Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ravi Karkar, Jessica Schroeder, Daniel A Epstein, Laura R Pina, Jeffrey Scofield, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, Sean A Munson, Roger Vilardaga, and Jasmine Zia. 2017. Tummytrials: a feasibility study of using self-experimentation to detect individualized food triggers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6850–6863. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025480Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rohit Ashok Khot, Florian Mueller, 2019. Human-food interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction 12, 4(2019), 238–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000074Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging framing effects to enhance personal productivity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858428Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Bongshin Lee, Eun Kyoung Choe, and Jinwook Seo. 2017. OmniTrack: A flexible self-tracking approach leveraging semi-automated tracking. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130930Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mandy Korpusik and Jim Glass. 2021. Coco Nutrition. https://www.coco-nutrition.com/.Google Scholar
- Mandy Korpusik, Salima Taylor, Sai Krupa Das, Cheryl Gilhooly, Susan Roberts, and James Glass. 2019. A food logging system for iOS with natural spoken language meal descriptions (P21-009-19). Current developments in nutrition 3, Supplement_1 (2019), nzz041–P21. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzz041.P21-009-19Google Scholar
- Brian Y Lim, Xinni Chng, and Shengdong Zhao. 2017. Trade-off between automation and accuracy in mobile photo recognition food logging. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium of Chinese CHI. 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3080631.3080640Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuhan Luo, Bongshin Lee, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2020. TandemTrack: shaping consistent exercise experience by complementing a mobile app with a smart speaker. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376616Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuhan Luo, Peiyi Liu, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2019. Co-Designing food trackers with dietitians: Identifying design opportunities for food tracker customization. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300822Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holger Lütters, Malte Friedrich-Freksa, and Marc Egger. 2018. Effects of speech assistance in online questionnaires. In General Online Research Conference, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
- Mark Mirtchouk, Christopher Merck, and Samantha Kleinberg. 2016. Automated estimation of food type and amount consumed from body-worn audio and motion sensors. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971677Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth L Murnane, Dan Cosley, Pamara Chang, Shion Guha, Ellen Frank, Geri Gay, and Mark Matthews. 2016. Self-monitoring practices, attitudes, and needs of individuals with bipolar disorder: implications for the design of technologies to manage mental health. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23, 3(2016), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv165Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shuo Niu, D Scott McCrickard, Timothy L Stelter, Alan Dix, and G Don Taylor. 2019. Reorganize Your Blogs: Supporting Blog Re-visitation with Natural Language Processing and Visualization. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, 4 (2019), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3040066Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arnel B Ocay, Jane M Fernandez, and Thelma D Palaoag. 2017. NutriTrack: Android-based food recognition app for nutrition awareness. In 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC). IEEE, 2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.1109/CompComm.2017.8322907Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hyungik Oh, Jonathan Nguyen, Soundarya Soundararajan, and Ramesh Jain. 2018. Multimodal food journaling. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multimedia for Personal Health and Health Care. 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264996.3265000Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronaldo Parente, Ned Kock, and John Sonsini. 2004. An analysis of the implementation and impact of speech-recognition technology in the healthcare sector. Perspectives in Health Information Management 1 (2004). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2047322/Google Scholar
- Somani Patnaik, Emma Brunskill, and William Thies. 2009. Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: A study of forms, SMS, and voice. In 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD). IEEE, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTD.2009.5426700Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernd Ploderer, Wolfgang Reitberger, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, and Julia van Gemert-Pijnen. 2014. Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 7 (2014), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0779-yGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Margaret Raber, Tom Baranowski, Karla Crawford, Shreela V Sharma, Vanessa Schick, Christine Markham, Wenyan Jia, Mingui Sun, Emily Steinman, and Joya Chandra. 2020. The Healthy Cooking Index: Nutrition optimizing home food preparation practices across multiple data collection methods. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2020.01.008Google Scholar
- Melanie Revilla, Mick P Couper, Oriol J Bosch, and Marc Asensio. 2020. Testing the use of voice input in a smartphone web survey. Social Science Computer Review 38, 2 (2020), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318810715Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sherry Ruan, Jacob O Wobbrock, Kenny Liou, Andrew Ng, and James A Landay. 2018. Comparing speech and keyboard text entry for short messages in two languages on touchscreen phones. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 4 (2018), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161187Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samsung, Inc.2021. Samsung Voice Recorder. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://www.samsung.com/au/support/mobile-devices/using-voice-recorder/Google Scholar
- Kshitij Saxena, Robert Diamond, Reid F Conant, Terri H Mitchell, Guido Gallopyn, and Kristin E Yakimow. 2018. Provider adoption of speech recognition and its impact on satisfaction, documentation quality, efficiency, and cost in an inpatient EHR. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings 2018 (2018), 186. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961784/Google Scholar
- Michael F Schober, Frederick G Conrad, Christopher Antoun, Patrick Ehlen, Stefanie Fail, Andrew L Hupp, Michael Johnston, Lucas Vickers, H Yanna Yan, and Chan Zhang. 2015. Precision and disclosure in text and voice interviews on smartphones. PloS one 10, 6 (2015), e0128337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128337Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benjamin Schüz, Natalie Schüz, and Stuart G Ferguson. 2015. It’s the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 12, 1(2015), 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0312-3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lisa B Signorello, Heather M Munro, Maciej S Buchowski, David G Schlundt, Sarah S Cohen, Margaret K Hargreaves, and William J Blot. 2009. Estimating nutrient intake from a food frequency questionnaire: incorporating the elements of race and geographic region. American journal of epidemiology 170, 1 (2009), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp098Google Scholar
- Lucas M Silva, Yuqi Huai, and Daniel A Epstein. 2020. Exploring Voice Input Opportunities in Multimodal Food Journaling. In CHI’20 Workshop on Conversational Agents for Health and Wellbeing.Google Scholar
- Rachel Silver, Mandy Korpusik, Salima Taylor, Sai Das, Cheryl Gilhooly, James Glass, and Susan Roberts. 2019. Testing the Validity of a Natural Spoken Language Application for the Self-Monitoring of Daily Dietary Intake (P13-035-19). Current developments in nutrition 3, Supplement_1 (2019), nzz036–P13. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzz036.P13-035-19Google Scholar
- Jolene D Smyth, Don A Dillman, Leah Melani Christian, and Mallory McBride. 2009. Open-ended questions in web surveys: Can increasing the size of answer boxes and providing extra verbal instructions improve response quality?Public Opinion Quarterly 73, 2 (2009), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp029Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffery Sobal and Carole A Bisogni. 2009. Constructing food choice decisions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 38, suppl_1 (2009), s37–s46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9124-5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hyewon Suh, Nina Shahriaree, Eric B Hekler, and Julie A Kientz. 2016. Developing and validating the user burden scale: A tool for assessing user burden in computing systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3988–3999.Google ScholarDigital Library
- TeamViewer. 2021. TeamViewer QuickSupport. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://www.teamviewer.com/en-us/info/quicksupport/Google Scholar
- Nađa Terzimehić, Christina Schneegass, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2018. Towards finding windows of opportunity for ubiquitous healthy eating interventions. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_8Google ScholarCross Ref
- WA Van Staveren, JO De Boer, and J Burema. 1985. Validity and reproducibility of a dietary history method estimating the usual food intake during one month. The American journal of clinical nutrition 42, 3 (1985), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/42.3.554Google Scholar
- Stephen H Walsh. 2004. The clinician’s perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. Bmj 328, 7449 (2004), 1184–1187. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1184Google Scholar
- Yunlong Wang, Ulrike Pfeil, and Harald Reiterer. 2016. Supporting self-assembly: The IKEA effect on mobile health persuasive technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Workshop on Multimedia for Personal Health and Health Care. 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2985766.2985775Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthias Wenzel, Anja Perlich, Julia PA von Thienen, and Christoph Meinel. 2019. New ways of data entry in doctor-patient encounters. In Design Thinking Research. Springer, 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97082-0_9Google Scholar
- Yixuan Zhang and Andrea G Parker. 2020. Eat4Thought: A Design of Food Journaling. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383044Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zoom Video Communications, Inc.2021. Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing - Zoom. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://zoom.us/Google Scholar
Recommendations
Investigating Preferred Food Description Practices in Digital Food Journaling
DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceJournaling of consumed foods through digital devices is a popular self-tracking strategy for weight loss and eating mindfulness. Research has explored modalities, like photos and open-ended text and voice descriptions, to make journaling less burdensome ...
NoteWordy: Investigating Touch and Speech Input on Smartphones for Personal Data Capture
Speech as a natural and low-burden input modality has great potential to support personal data capture. However, little is known about how people use speech input, together with traditional touch input, to capture different types of data in self-tracking ...
Co-Designing Food Trackers with Dietitians: Identifying Design Opportunities for Food Tracker Customization
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe report co-design workshops with registered dietitians conducted to identify opportunities for designing customizable food trackers. Dietitians typically see patients who have different dietary problems, thus having different information needs. ...
Comments