skip to main content
10.1145/3488042.3488070acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageskoli-callingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

English versus Native Language for Higher Education in Computer Science: A Pilot Study

Published:18 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

While the official language of instruction for higher education programs in Pakistan is English, in practice it can vary from English-only, to some combination of English and a native language, to native language only. There is a lack of consistency not just across institutions, but also across classrooms in the same institution. We have conducted a pilot study based on a small cohort of computer science students, who happened to have some of the lectures of the same course delivered in Urdu, and the others in English. Based on a questionnaire response with both quantitative and free text questions, we investigated students’ self reported oral and written communication skills, as well as their preference of language for lectures. We found, albeit based on a limited, pilot study, that using Urdu, the first language of most of our students, as the medium of oral communication (lectures, general classroom communication) should be preferred, whereas English should remain the language of choice for written communication. We expect to expand this study to multiple classrooms across institutions in Pakistan and other countries operating in a similar context, so that more definitive conclusions can be derived, potentially leading to better informed, evidence-based policies and practices in the future.

References

  1. John Airey. 2009. Science, language, and literacy: Case studies of learning in Swedish university physics. Ph.D. Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jessica Ball. 2010. Educational equity for children from diverse language backgrounds: mother tongue-based bilingual or multilingual education in the early years: summary. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carolyn J Benson. 2002. Real and potential benefits of bilingual programmes in developing countries. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 5, 6(2002), 303–317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Paul Chandler and John Sweller. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction 8, 4 (1991), 293–332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hywel Coleman. 2010. Teaching and learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education. Islamabad: The British Council(2010), 1–56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Philip J Guo. 2018. Non-native english speakers learning computer programming: Barriers, desires, and design opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Harris Khalique. 2007. The Urdu-English relationship and its impact on Pakistan’s social development. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kimmo Kosonen. 2005. Education in local languages: Policy and practice in South-East Asia. Asia-Pacific Programme of Education for All First Language First: Community-based Literacy Programmes for Minority Language Contexts in Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok, 2005.(2005), 96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sabiha Mansoor. 2004. The status and role of regional languages in higher education in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yogendra Pal and Sridhar Iyer. 2015. Classroom versus screencast for native language learners: Effect of medium of instruction on knowledge of programming. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education. 290–295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, Hanqi Zhang, Viren Abhyankar, Saswati Mukerjee, Eda Zhang, Jim Williams, Richard Halverson, and Jignesh M Patel. 2019. Impact of bilingual cs education on student learning and engagement in a data structures course. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fauzia Shamim and Uzma Rashid. 2019. The English/Urdu-Medium Divide in Pakistan: Consequences for Learner Identity and Future Life Chances.Journal of Education and Educational Development 6, 1(2019), 43–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, Kasama Ketsuriyonk, Jignesh M Patel, and Richard Halverson. 2018. Does native language play a role in learning a programming language?. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 417–422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Unesco. 1953. The Use of Vernacular Languages in Education. Unesco. https://books.google.co.bw/books?id=Ilc_MQAACAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yogendra Pal and Sridhar Iyer. 2015. Effect of medium of instruction on programming ability acquired through screencast. In 2015 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering. IEEE, 17–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    Koli Calling '21: Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
    November 2021
    287 pages
    ISBN:9781450384889
    DOI:10.1145/3488042

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 November 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate80of182submissions,44%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format