skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3503579acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract
Public Access

The LilyTiny: A Case Study in Expanding Access to Electronic Textiles

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The LilyTiny sewable microcontroller was created ten years ago, in an effort to make electronic textiles more accessible. At the time, e-textiles was gaining traction as a means to invite more diverse participation in computing, but financial and instructional barriers stood in the way of broader adoption. In addition, there existed a scaffolding gap between projects involving lights, batteries, and thread – and those requiring programming (i.e. leveraging the LilyPad Arduino and/or additional sensors or outputs). In an effort to expand access to electronic textiles, we designed the LilyTiny, an inexpensive, pre-programmed sewable microcontroller which controls assorted LED patterns, and which later became available for purchase through SparkFun. Alongside the LilyTiny, we released a free workshop guide for educators which details five low-cost activities that can be taught without any prior electronics experience.

This paper summarizes our development of the LilyTiny and companion curriculum – and reflects on whether we met our stated goal of expanding access to electronic textiles in the decade since. We share and discuss some measures of impact, including a survey of derivative products and a multi-year analysis of sales data from the LilyTiny’s sole distributor SparkFun Electronics.

References

  1. Leah Buechley and Michael Eisenberg. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: Toward wearable engineering for everyone. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 2 (2008), 12–15. Publisher: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: Using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’08. ACM Press, Florence, Italy, 423. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, and Nwanua Elumeze. 2007. Towards a curriculum for electronic textiles in the high school classroom. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 28–32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Leah Buechley and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2010. LilyPad in the wild: how hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS ’10. ACM Press, Aarhus, Denmark, 199. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leah Buechley, Kylie Peppler, Michael Eisenberg, and Kafai Yasmin. 2013. Textile Messages: Dispatches from the World of E-Textiles and Education. New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies. Volume 62.ERIC.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Leah Buechley and Kanjun Qiu. 2014. Sew electric. H.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Diana Eng. 2009. Fashion geek: clothing, accessories, tech(1st ed ed.). North Light Books, Cincinnati, Ohio. OCLC: ocn192079587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Deborah A. Fields, Yasmin B. Kafai, and Kristin Searle. 2012. Functional aesthetics for learning: Creative tensions in youth e-textile designs. (2012). Publisher: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kate Hartman, Brian Jepson, Emma Dvorak, and Rebecca Demarest. 2014. Make: wearable electronics(first edition ed.). Maker Media, Sebastopol, CA. OCLC: ocn890200431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chris Hill, Michael Schneider, Ann Eisenberg, and Mark D. Gross. 2021. The ThreadBoard: Designing an E-Textile Rapid Prototyping Board. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cristyne Hébert and Jennifer Jenson. 2020. Making in schools: student learning through an e-textiles curriculum. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 41, 5 (Sept. 2020), 740–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1769937 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1769937.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gayithri Jayathirtha and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2019. Electronic textiles in computer science education: a synthesis of efforts to broaden participation, increase interest, and deepen learning. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 713–719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yasmin B. Kafai, Deborah A. Fields, and Kristin A. Searle. 2011. Everyday creativity in novice e-textile designs. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. 353–354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yasmin B. Kafai, Eunkyoung Lee, Kristin Searle, Deborah Fields, Eliot Kaplan, and Debora Lui. 2014. A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 14, 1 (2014), 1–20. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yasmin B. Kafai, Kristin Searle, Eliot Kaplan, Deborah Fields, Eunkyoung Lee, and Debora Lui. 2013. Cupcake cushions, scooby doo shirts, and soft boomboxes: e-textiles in high school to promote computational concepts, practices, and perceptions. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 311–316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Victoria Herbst Kim. 2019. Development of an e-Textile Debugging Module to Increase Computational Thinking among Graduate Education Students. PhD Thesis. Pepperdine University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kobakant. [n.d.]. How To Get What You Want. https://www.kobakant.at/DIY/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. lady ada. 2013. Introducing Gemma: Introducing Adafruit’s mini wearable microcontroller. https://learn.adafruit.com/introducing-gemma/introductionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji Sun Lee. 2008. Tech DIY for moms and kids: the DIY technology project for women. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 posters. 1–1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ji Sun Lee. 2008. Technology education for woman by diy technology in closing gender gap. In CHI’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3447–3452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alison Lewis, Fang-Yu Lin, Heather Weston, and Hiromi Sugie. 2008. Switch craft: battery-powered crafts to make and sew (1st ed ed.). Potter Craft, New York. OCLC: 196308401.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Emily Lovell and Leah Buechley. 2010. An e-sewing tutorial for DIY learning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC ’10. ACM Press, Barcelona, Spain, 230. https://doi.org/10.1145/1810543.1810578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Emily Marie Lovell. 2011. A Soft Circuit Curriculum to Promote Technological Self-Efficacy. Master’s thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. David A Mellis, Massimo Banzi, David Cuartielles, and Tom Igoe. 2007. Arduino: An Open Electronics Prototyping Platform. In Proceedings of CHI. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. National Center for Women & Information Technology. [n.d.]. e-Textiles-in-a-Box. https://www.ncwit.org/resources/e-textiles-boxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. National Center for Women & Information Technology. [n.d.]. NCWIT Programs-in-a-Box. https://www.ncwit.org/resources/type/programs-boxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Grace Ngai, Stephen C.F. Chan, Joey C.Y. Cheung, and Winnie W.Y. Lau. 2009. The TeeBoard: an education-friendly construction platform for e-textiles and wearable computing. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09. ACM Press, Boston, MA, USA, 249. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Grace Ngai, Stephen CF Chan, Hong Va Leong, and Vincent TY Ng. 2013. Designing i* CATch: A multipurpose, education-friendly construction kit for physical and wearable computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 13, 2 (2013), 1–30. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Grace Ngai, Stephen C.F. Chan, Vincent T.Y. Ng, Joey C.Y. Cheung, Sam S.S. Choy, Winnie W.Y. Lau, and Jason T.P. Tse. 2010. i*CATch: a scalable plug-n-play wearable computing framework for novices and children. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10. ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 443. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753393Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tony Olsson. 2011. Open Softwear: fashionable prototyping and wearable computing using the Arduino. Blushing Boy, Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar. OCLC: 754086191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Syuzi Pakhchyan. 2008. Fashioning Technology: A DIY Intro to Smart Crafting. ”O’Reilly Media, Inc.”. Google-Books-ID: xVVvKVQSSR8C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C. A. Paulsen, S. Green, and S. Carroll. 2011. Design Squad Nation: Evaluation report. Technical Report. Concord Evaluation Group, LLC, Concord, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hannah Perner-Wilson. [n.d.]. Instructables | Plusea (Hannah Perner-Wilson). https://www.instructables.com/member/Plusea/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanjun Qiu, Leah Buechley, Edward Baafi, and Wendy Dubow. 2013. A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children. 20–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kristin A. Searle and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2015. Boys’ Needlework: Understanding Gendered and Indigenous Perspectives on Computing and Crafting with Electronic Textiles.. In ICER. 31–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Angela Sheehan. [n.d.]. Soft Circuit Saturdays. https://www.gellacraft.com/softcircuitsaturdaysGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. SparkFun. [n.d.]. SparkFun Education - Maker Education. https://sparkfuneducation.com/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Becky Stern and Tyler Cooper. 2015. Getting started with Adafruit FLORA: making wearables with an Arduino-compatible electronics platform. Maker Media, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Stern, Becky. [n.d.]. Instructables | bekathwia (Becky Stern). https://www.instructables.com/member/bekathwia/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Marisa Wolsky. 2014. Design Squad: Inspiring a New Generation of Engineers. In The Go-To Guide for Engineering Curricula, Grades 6-8: Choosing and Using the Best Instructional Materials for Your Students. 19. Publisher: Corwin Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The LilyTiny: A Case Study in Expanding Access to Electronic Textiles
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format