skip to main content
10.1145/355017.355028acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 November 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

The process of fixation identification—separating and labeling fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols—is an essential part of eye-movement data analysis and can have a dramatic impact on higher-level analyses. However, algorithms for performing fixation identification are often described informally and rarely compared in a meaningful way. In this paper we propose a taxonomy of fixation identification algorithms that classifies algorithms in terms of how they utilize spatial and temporal information in eye-tracking protocols. Using this taxonomy, we describe five algorithms that are representative of different classes in the taxonomy and are based on commonly employed techniques. We then evaluate and compare these algorithms with respect to a number of qualitative characteristics. The results of these comparisons offer interesting implications for the use of the various algorithms in future work.

References

  1. 1.Alpern, M. (1962). Type of movement. In H. Davson (Ed.), The Eye, Vol. 3. (pp, 63-151). New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Camerini, P. M., 13albiati, 13, & Maffioli, F. (1988). Algorithms for finding optimum trees: Description, use and evaluation. Annals of Operations Research, 13, 265- 397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.DenBuurman, R., Boersma, T., & Gerrisen, J. F. (1981). Eye movements and the perceptual span in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 227-235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.Ditchburn, R. W. (1980). The function of small saccades. Vision Research, 20, 271-272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.Erkelens, C. J., & Vogels, I. M. L. C. (1995). The initial direction and landing position of saccades. In J. M. Findiay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes, and Applications (pp. 133-144). New York: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Fuchs, A. F. (1971). The saccadic system. In P. Bach-y- Rita, C. C. Collins, & J. E. Hyde (Eds.), The Control of Eye Movements (pp. 343-362). New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Goldberg, J. H,, & Schryver, J. C. (1995). Eye-gazecontingent control of the computer interface: Methodology and example for zoom detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 338- 350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1984). Using eye fixations to study reading comprehension. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research (pp. 151-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Karsh, R., & Breitenbach, F. W. (1983). Looking at looking: The amorphous fixation measure. In R, Groner, C. Menz, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.), Eye Movements and Psychological Functions: International Views (pp. 53-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Land, M. F., & Lee, D. N. (1994). Where we look when we steer. Nature, 369, 742-744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision Research, 11, 929-942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77, 257-286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes, and Applications (pp. 3-21). New York: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Salvucci, D. D. (1999). Mapping eye movements to cognitive processes. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Salvucci, D. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Tracing eye movement protocols with cognitive process models. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 923-928). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Salvucci, D. D., & Anderson, J. R. (in press). Integrating analogical mapping and general problem solving: The path-mapping theory. Cognitive Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Sen, T., & Megaw, T. (1984). The effects of task variables and prolonged performance on saccadie eye movement parameters. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 103-111). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Stark, L., & Ellis, S. R. (1981). Scanpath revisited: Cognitive models of direct active looking. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception (pp. 193- 226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Suppes, P. (1990). Eye-movement models for arithmetic and reading performance. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye Movements and their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes (pp. 455-477). New York: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Widdel, H. (1984). Operational problems in analysing eye movements. In A. 13. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 21-29). New York: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ETRA '00: Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
          November 2000
          147 pages
          ISBN:1581132808
          DOI:10.1145/355017

          Copyright © 2000 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 November 2000

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          ETRA '00 Paper Acceptance Rate18of29submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

          Upcoming Conference

          ETRA '24
          The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
          June 4 - 7, 2024
          Glasgow , United Kingdom

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader