skip to main content
10.1145/3589132.3625588acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Equity-Aware Cross-Graph Interactive Reinforcement Learning for Bike Station Network Expansion

Published:22 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Thanks to advances in the urban big data, the bike sharing, especially station-based bike sharing, has emerged as the important first-/last-mile connectivities in many smart cities. Bike station network (BSN) expansion recommendation, i.e., recommending placement locations of new stations, is essential for satisfying local mobility demands, enhancing the BSN service quality, and may significantly affect the resource fairness and accessibility of different communities in the neighborhood. Furthermore, the dynamic and complex urban mobility environments make the station placement highly challenging to satisfy the mobility needs.

To ease and facilitate the urban planning with awareness of mobility equity, we have designed and proposed CGIRL, a novel equity-aware Cross-Graph Interactive Reinforcement Learning approach for BSN expansion recommendation. Specifically, we have designed a novel reward function within our actor-critic reinforcement learning approach, jointly accounting for the local mobility, bike resource distribution equity, and accessibility of different socioeconomic groups to the expanded stations. To capture the policy of station decisions from the BSN deployment, we integrate the location graph's mobility and equity correlations across the city regions as a graph network, and design a novel cross-graph interaction network with embedding attention and sequential dependency that adaptively captures and interactively differentiates the correlations within station placement. Our extensive experimental studies upon a total of 393 (111 new) bike stations from New York City (NYC), Washington D.C. (DC), and Chicago have validated the effectiveness of CGIRL in the equity-aware BSN expansion recommendation.

References

  1. 2021. Aiming for Equity, Indego Adding 30 Bike-Share Stations, E-Bikes in 2022. https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/green/indego-2022-bike-share-expansion/3034356/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2021. Bike Share is Rapidly Taking the World by Storm Post-Covid. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/09/30/2306599/0/en/Bike-Share-is-Rapidly-Taking-the-World-by-Storm-Post-Covid.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chacha Chen, Hua Wei, Nan Xu, Guanjie Zheng, Ming Yang, Yuanhao Xiong, Kai Xu, and Zhenhui Li. 2020. Toward a thousand lights: Decentralized deep reinforcement learning for large-scale traffic signal control. In Proc. AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kamil Ciosek, Quan Vuong, Robert Loftin, and Katja Hofmann. 2019. Better exploration with optimistic actor-critic. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12807 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Greg P Griffin and Junfeng Jiao. 2019. Crowdsourcing bike share station locations: Evaluating participation and placement. Journal of the American Planning Association (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. IEEE CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Suining He and Kang G Shin. 2020. Towards fine-grained flow forecasting: A graph attention approach for bike sharing systems. In Proc. ACM WWW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Suining He and Kang G. Shin. 2022. Information Fusion for (Re)Configuring Bike Station Networks With Crowdsourcing. IEEE TKDE (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsun-Ping Hsieh, Fandel Lin, Jiawei Jiang, Tzu-Ying Kuo, and Yu-En Chang. 2021. Inferring Long-Term Demand of Newly Established Stations for Expansion Areas in Bike Sharing System. Applied Sciences (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shenggong Ji, Zhaoyuan Wang, Tianrui Li, and Yu Zheng. 2020. Spatio-temporal feature fusion for dynamic taxi route recommendation via deep reinforcement learning. Knowledge-Based Systems (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yexin Li, Yu Zheng, Huichu Zhang, and Lei Chen. 2015. Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system. In Proc. ACM SIGSPATIAL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Junming Liu, Leilei Sun, Qiao Li, Jingci Ming, Yanchi Liu, and Hui Xiong. 2017. Functional zone based hierarchical demand prediction for bike system expansion. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kunpeng Liu, Xiaolin Li, Cliff C Zou, Haibo Huang, and Yanjie Fu. 2020. Ambulance dispatch via deep reinforcement learning. In Proc. ACM SIGSPATIAL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ryan Lowe, Yi Wu, Aviv Tamar, Jean Harb, Pieter Abbeel, and Igor Mordatch. 2017. Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02275 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahmoud Owais and Mostafa K Osman. 2018. Complete hierarchical multi-objective genetic algorithm for transit network design problem. Expert Systems with Applications (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiaodong Qian and Miguel Jaller. 2020. Bikesharing, equity, and disadvantaged communities: A case study in Chicago. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Susan A Shaheen, Elliot W Martin, Adam P Cohen, Nelson D Chan, and Mike Pogodzinski. 2014. Public Bikesharing in North America During a Period of Rapid Expansion: Understanding Business Models, Industry Trends & User Impacts, MTI Report 12--29. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Umer Siddique, Paul Weng, and Matthieu Zimmer. 2020. Learning Fair Policies in Multi-Objective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewards. In Proc. ICML. PMLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. David Silver, Guy Lever, Nicolas Heess, Thomas Degris, Daan Wierstra, and Martin Riedmiller. 2014. Deterministic policy gradient algorithms. In Proc. ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Richard S Sutton, David A McAllester, Satinder P Singh, and Yishay Mansour. 2000. Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. In Proc. NeurIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Petar Veličković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Graph attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10903 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yi Wei, Jian Gang Jin, Jingfeng Yang, and Linjun Lu. 2019. Strategic network expansion of urban rapid transit systems: A bi-objective programming model. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu Wei, Minjia Mao, Xi Zhao, Jianhua Zou, and Ping An. 2020. City metro network expansion with reinforcement learning. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ronald J Williams. 1992. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine Learning (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. An Yan and Bill Howe. 2020. Fairness-Aware Demand Prediction for New Mobility. In Proc. AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Zhongzhen Yang, Bin Yu, and Chuntian Cheng. 2007. A parallel ant colony algorithm for bus network optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yin Zhang, Yujie Li, Ranran Wang, M Shamim Hossain, and Huimin Lu. 2020. Multi-aspect aware session-based recommendation for intelligent transportation services. IEEE T-ITS (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ding Zhou, Hao Liu, Tong Xu, Le Zhang, Rui Zha, and Hui Xiong. 2021. Transportation recommendation with fairness consideration. In Proc. Springer DASFAA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Equity-Aware Cross-Graph Interactive Reinforcement Learning for Bike Station Network Expansion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '23: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2023
      686 pages
      ISBN:9798400701689
      DOI:10.1145/3589132

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader