skip to main content
10.1145/358916.358947acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

We outline some of the benefits of shared visual information for collaborative repair tasks and report on a study comparing collaborative performance on a manual task by workers and helpers who are located side-by-side or connected via audio-video or audio-only links. Results show that the dyads complete the task more quickly and accurately when helpers are co-located than when they are connected via an audio link. However, they didn't achieve similar efficiency gains when they communicated through an audio/video link. These results demonstrate the value of a shared visual work space, but raise questions about the adequacy of current video communication technology for implementing it.

References

  1. 1.Bass, L., Kasabach, C., Martin, R., Siewiorek, D., Smailagic, A., & Stivoric, J. (1997). The design of a wearable computer, CHI Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, 139-146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. E. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Clark, H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A. & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 21-58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Gaver, W., Sellen, A., Heath, C., & Luff, P. One is not enough: Multiple views in a media space. Interchi '93 (335-341). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Grice, H. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41- 58). New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Isaacs, E., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. J. of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9.Karsenty, L. (1999). Cooperative work and shared visual context: An empirical study of comprehension problems and in side-by-side and remote help dialogues. Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 283-315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Kraut, R. E., Miller, M. D., & Siegel, J. (1996) Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: Effects on outcomes and communication, Proceedings of CSCW'96 (57-66). NY: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Kuzuoka, H. (1992). Spatial workspace collaboration: A Sharedview video support system for remote collaboration capability. Proceedings of CHI'92 (533- 540). NY: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Kuzuoka, H., Kosuge, T., & Tanaka, K. (1994) GestureCam: A video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration, Proceedings of CSCW 94 (35-43). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Nardi, B., Schwarz, H., Kuchinsky, A., Leichner, R., Whittaker, S. & Sclabassi, R. (1993). Turning away from talking heads: The use of video-as-data in neurosurgery. Proceedings of Interchi '93 (327-334). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Orr, J. (1989). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: War stories and community memory among service technicians. In D. S. Middleton and D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective Remembering: Memory in Society. London: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Sachs, P. (1995). Transforming work: Collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 36-44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Smailagic, A. & Siewiorek, D. (1996) Modalities of interaction with CMU wearable computers, IEEE Personal Communications, 3(1), 14-25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.Veinott, E., Olson, J. Olson, G. & Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. Proceedings of CHI'99 (302-309). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Whittaker, S. & Geelhoed, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: How do they work and when are they useful? Int'l J. Man-Machine Studies, 39, 813-842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Whittaker, S. & O'Conaill, B. (1997). The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. In K. Finn, A. Sellen & S Wilbur (Eds.) Video-mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
          December 2000
          346 pages
          ISBN:1581132220
          DOI:10.1145/358916

          Copyright © 2000 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 December 2000

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CSCW '00 Paper Acceptance Rate36of199submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader