ABSTRACT
We outline some of the benefits of shared visual information for collaborative repair tasks and report on a study comparing collaborative performance on a manual task by workers and helpers who are located side-by-side or connected via audio-video or audio-only links. Results show that the dyads complete the task more quickly and accurately when helpers are co-located than when they are connected via an audio link. However, they didn't achieve similar efficiency gains when they communicated through an audio/video link. These results demonstrate the value of a shared visual work space, but raise questions about the adequacy of current video communication technology for implementing it.
- 1.Bass, L., Kasabach, C., Martin, R., Siewiorek, D., Smailagic, A., & Stivoric, J. (1997). The design of a wearable computer, CHI Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, 139-146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APAGoogle Scholar
- 3.Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. E. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 4.Clark, H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39Google ScholarCross Ref
- 5.Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A. & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 21-58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Gaver, W., Sellen, A., Heath, C., & Luff, P. One is not enough: Multiple views in a media space. Interchi '93 (335-341). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Grice, H. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41- 58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 8.Isaacs, E., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. J. of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 9.Karsenty, L. (1999). Cooperative work and shared visual context: An empirical study of comprehension problems and in side-by-side and remote help dialogues. Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 283-315. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Kraut, R. E., Miller, M. D., & Siegel, J. (1996) Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: Effects on outcomes and communication, Proceedings of CSCW'96 (57-66). NY: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Kuzuoka, H. (1992). Spatial workspace collaboration: A Sharedview video support system for remote collaboration capability. Proceedings of CHI'92 (533- 540). NY: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Kuzuoka, H., Kosuge, T., & Tanaka, K. (1994) GestureCam: A video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration, Proceedings of CSCW 94 (35-43). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Nardi, B., Schwarz, H., Kuchinsky, A., Leichner, R., Whittaker, S. & Sclabassi, R. (1993). Turning away from talking heads: The use of video-as-data in neurosurgery. Proceedings of Interchi '93 (327-334). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Orr, J. (1989). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: War stories and community memory among service technicians. In D. S. Middleton and D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective Remembering: Memory in Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 15.Sachs, P. (1995). Transforming work: Collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 36-44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Smailagic, A. & Siewiorek, D. (1996) Modalities of interaction with CMU wearable computers, IEEE Personal Communications, 3(1), 14-25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Veinott, E., Olson, J. Olson, G. & Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. Proceedings of CHI'99 (302-309). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Whittaker, S. & Geelhoed, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: How do they work and when are they useful? Int'l J. Man-Machine Studies, 39, 813-842. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Whittaker, S. & O'Conaill, B. (1997). The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. In K. Finn, A. Sellen & S Wilbur (Eds.) Video-mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 20.Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work
Recommendations
Relationships among speech, vision, and action in collaborative physical tasks
CHI EA '02: CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis workshop focuses on the relationships among speech, gaze and action in collaborative physical tasks. We address three key challenges: characterizing the nature of collaborative physical tasks, understanding how people coordinate their activities ...
The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence
CSCW '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workA shared visual workspace is one where multiple people can see the same objects at roughly the same time. We present findings from an experiment investigating the effects of shared visual space on a collaborative puzzle task. We show that having the ...
Effects of task properties, partner actions, and message content on eye gaze patterns in a collaborative task
CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHelpers providing guidance for collaborative physical tasks shift their gaze between the workspace, supply area, and instructions. Understanding when and why helpers gaze at each area is important both for a theoretical understanding of collaboration on ...
Comments