skip to main content
article
Free Access

Minimal-total-processing time drum and disk scheduling disciplines

Published:01 July 1974Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article investigates the application of minimal-total-processing-time (MTPT) scheduling disciplines to rotating storage units when random arrival of requests is allowed. Fixed-head drum and moving-head disk storage units are considered, and emphasis is placed on the relative merits of the MTPT scheduling discipline with respect to the shortest-latency-time-first (SLTF) scheduling discipline. The results of the simulation studies presented show that neither scheduling discipline is unconditionally superior to the other. For most fixed-head drum applications, the SLTF discipline is preferable to MTPT, but for intra-cylinder disk scheduling the MTPT discipline offers a distinct advantage over the SLTF discipline. The computational requirements of an algorithm that implements the MTPT scheduling discipline are shown to be comparable to SLTF algorithms. In both cases, the sorting procedure is the most time-consuming phase of the algorithm.

References

  1. 1 Abate, J., and Dubner, H. Optimizing the performance of a drum-like storage. IEEE Trans. on Computers C-18, 11 (Nov. 1969), 992-996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 Abate, J., Dubner, H., and Weinberg, S.B. Queueing analysis of the IBM 2314 disk storage facility. J. ACM 15, 4 (Oct. 1968), 557-589. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Coffman, E.G. Analysis of a drum input/output queue under scheduling operation in a paged computer system. J. ACM 16, 1 (Jan. 1969), 73-90, and Erratum, J. ACM 16, 4 (Oct. 1969), 646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 Denning, P.J. Effects of scheduling on file memory operations. Proc. AFIPS 1967 SJCC Vol. 30, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 9 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Frank, H. Analysis and optimization of disk storage devices for time sharing systems. J. ACM16, 4 (Oct. 1969), 602-620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 Fuller, S. H., and Baskett, F. An analysis of drum storage units. Tech. Rep. 26, Digital Syst. Lab., Stanford U., Stantord, Calif. (Aug. 1972). J. ACM (to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 Fuller, S.H. A simulator of computer systems with storage units having rotational delays. Tech. Note 17, Digital Syst. Lab., Stanford U., Stanford, Calif., Aug. 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Fuller, S.H. An optimal drum scheduling algorithm. IEEE Trans. on Computers C-21, 11 (Nov. 1972), 1153-1165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Fuller, S.H. Random arrivals and MTPT disk scheduling disciplines. Tech. Rep. 29, Digital Syst. Lab., Stanford U., Stanford, Calif., Aug. 1972. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Fuller, S.H. The expected difference between the SLTF and MTPT drum scheduling disciplines. Tech. Rep. 28, Digital Syst. Lab., Stanford U., Stanford, Calif., Aug. 1972. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11 IBM 3830 storage control and 3330 disk storage. Order No. GA26-1592-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Seaman, P.H., Lind, R.A., and Wilson, T.L. An analysis of auxiliary-storage activity. IBMSyst. J. 5, 3 (1969), 158-170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Stone, H.S., and Fuller, S.H. On the near-optimality of the shortest-latency-time-first drum scheduling discipline. Comm. ACM 16, 6 (June 1973), 352-353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14 Teorey, T.J., and Pinkerton, T.B. A comparative analysis of disk scheduling policies. Comm. ACM 15, 3 (Mar. 1972), 177-184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Minimal-total-processing time drum and disk scheduling disciplines

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Communications of the ACM
            Communications of the ACM  Volume 17, Issue 7
            July 1974
            63 pages
            ISSN:0001-0782
            EISSN:1557-7317
            DOI:10.1145/361011
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 1974 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 1974

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader