skip to main content
article
Free Access

Bounded context syntactic analysis

Published:01 February 1964Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Certain phase structure grammars define languages in which the phrasehood and structure of a substring of a sentence may be determined by consideration of only a bounded context of the substring. It is possible to determine, for any specified bound on the number of contextual characters considered, whether a given grammar is such a bounded context grammar. Such grammars are free from syntactic ambiguity. Syntactic analysis of sentences in a bounded context language may be performed by a standard process and requires a number of operations proportional to the length of sentence analyzed.

Bounded context grammars form models for most languages used in computer programming, and many methods of syntactic analysis, including analysis by operator precedence, are special cases of bounded context analysis.

References

  1. 1 ARDEN AND GRAHAM, On GAT and the construction of translators. Comm. ACM 2 (1959), 24-26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 BAR-HILLEL, Y., PERLES, M., AND SHAMIR, E. On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars. Z. Phonetik, Sprachwise, und Kommunikationsforach. 14, 2(1961), 143-172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 CHOMSKY, N. On certain formal properties of grammars. Inf. Contr. 2 (1959), 137-167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4 EICKEL, J., PAUL, M., BAUER, F. L,, AND SAMELSON, K. A syntax-controlled generator of formal languages processors. Institut f~r Angew. Math., Johannes Gutenberg Univ. in Mainz (Sept. 1962).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 FLOYD, R. W. A descriptive language for symbol manipulation. J. ACM 8, 4 (1961), 579-584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 ----. Syntactic analysis and operator precedence. J. ACM 10 (1963), 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 GORN, S. Detection of generative ambiguities in context-free mechanical languages. J. ACM 10, 2 (1963), 196-208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8 PAUL, M. A general processor for certain formal languages. Symbolic Languages in Data Processing, Proc. 1962 Rome Symposium, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 SAMELSON, K., AND BAUER, F. L. Sequential formula translation. Comm. ACM 8, 2 (1960), 76-83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 SCHUTZENBERGER, M. P., AND CHOMSKY, N. The algebraic theory of context-free languages. Computer Programming and Formal Systems, North-Holland, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Bounded context syntactic analysis

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image Communications of the ACM
              Communications of the ACM  Volume 7, Issue 2
              Feb. 1964
              92 pages
              ISSN:0001-0782
              EISSN:1557-7317
              DOI:10.1145/363921
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 1964 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 February 1964

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader