skip to main content
10.1145/365024.365038acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Improving the performance of the cyberlink mental interface with “yes / no program”

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We summarise the results of the first studies to investigate the Cyberlink brain body interface as an assistive technology. Three phases of studies and a contextual inquiry were performed with a range of users. A focus group was formed from brain-injured users with locked-in syndrome who have no other method of communication or control of a computer than the Cyberlink. Versions of a Yes/No program were then created to allow communication and have achieved some success with the focus group. The purpose of this paper is to discuss how this program has been improved and what steps need to be taken to create communication programs for persons with severe motor impairment. As a result of our experiences, we have been able to develop a set of design guidelines for brain-body interface operated Yes/No programs. These are presented and justified on the basis of our experiences. We also raise some general issues for assistive technologies of this nature.

References

  1. 1.Barke, R., (1986), "Science, Technology, and Public Policy," CQ Press, Washington D.C. USA, page 130Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Berg, C., Junker, A., Rothman, A., Leininger, R. (1998) The Cyberlink Interface: Development of A Hands-Free Continuous/Discrete Multi-Channel Computer Interface, Brain Actuated Technologies, Incorporated 139 East Davis Street, Yellow Springs, Ohio 45387, USAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Berkow, R., Beers, M., Bogin, R., Fletcher, A., (1997) "The Merck Manual of Medical Information," Merck Research Laboratories, Whitehouse Station, NJ, p. 372 Bevan,N.(1999)http://www.usability.serco.com/msexplor er/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Beven,N.,(1999)www.usability.serco.com/msexplorer/ind ex.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Bickford, P., (1997) "Interface Design," Academic Press, San Diego CA, pages 265-270, 287 -292Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Brain Injury Association Fact Sheet, available on request from 105 N. Alfred S., Alexandria, Va., 22314, USAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Brooks, H., (1984) "The Resolution of Technically Intensive Public Policy Disputes," Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 9, (Winter), Page 46Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Chatrian, G., Bergamasco, B., Bricolo, B., Frost, J., Prior, P., (1996) "IFCN recommended standards for electrophysiological monitoring in comatose and other unresponsive states. Report on IFCN committee," Electoencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 99, pages 103-122Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Cole, E., Dehdashti, P., (1992)"Interface Design for Individuals with Mild Learning Disabilities from Traumatic Brain Injury," CHI 1992 Proceedings, page 16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Davis, B., Personal Interviews August 2000, [email protected]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Doherty, E, Bloor, C., Cockton, G(1999) The "Cyberlink" Brain Body Interface as an Assistive Technology for Traumatically Brain Injured Persons, CyberPsychology and Behavior, Liebert Publications, Larchmont, N.Y., 249-259Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Doherty, E, Bloor, C., Cockton, G., Engel, W., Rizzo, J., Berg, C., (1999) Cyberlink - An Interface for Quadriplegic and Non - Verbal People, Pages 237-249, Conference Proceedings, CT99 3 rd International Cognitive Technology, Procs at www.cogtech.org/CT99Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Doherty, E., Bloor, C., Cockton, G., Engel, W., Benigno, D., "Yes/No - A Mind Operated device for Severely Motor Impaired Persons" (2000), Computers Helping People with Special Needs, ICCHP 2000, Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, July 17-21,2000 Karlsruhe, GermanyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Doherty, E., Cockton, G., Stephenson, G., "Using a Cyberlink Mental Interface for Relaxation and Controlling a Robot," September 2000 ACM SIGCAPH Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Doherty, E. Cockton, G., Bloor, C., Benigno, D., "A Study Examining the Performance of the Cyberlink Mental Interface," ACM SIGBIO (awaiting publication) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Doherty, Rizzo J., Junker, A., Walters, J. Hermann, D., (to appear) "Effect of Cyberlink on One Adult Male with Cerebral Palsy's Blood Pressure and Pulse" Cognitive Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Doherty, E., Cockton, G., Bloor, C., Benigno, D., (2000), "Mixing Oil and Water: Transcending Method Boundaries in Assistive Technology for Traumatic Brain Injury" Conference on Universal Usability Proceedings, Washington D.C., Nov 15-17 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Doherty, E., Cockton, G., Bloor, C., Engel, W., Rizzo, J., (to appear) "A Cyberlink Helmet Study to Improve Usability" ICCIT 2001 Conference Proceedings, Montclair, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Engel, Walter, Personal Interviews, August 2000, 13 Brookside Avenue, Engelwood, NJ, 07631Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Furness T, "The Super Cockpit and its Human Factors Challenges," Proc. Human Factors Society 30 th Annual Meeting, 1986, Pages 48-52,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Iskowitz M., (1999) "Finding the Right Combination for Communication," Advance for Speech-Language Pathologists & Audiologists, August 9,1999, page 12-13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Junker A., United States Patent 5,692,517 Dec.2,1997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Katz, R., Haig, A., Clark, B, Rocco, J., DiPaola, (1992) "Long-Term Survival, Prognosis and Life Care Planning for 29 Patients with Chronic Locked - In Syndrome" Archives Physical Medical Rehabilitation Vol 73, May 1992 pages 403-405Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Maus-Clum, N., Cole, M., McCort, T., Eifler, D., (1991) Journal of Neuroscience, October 1991, Vol. 23(4), p273- 85Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Metz, S., Hoffman, B., "Mind Operated Devices," Cognitive Technology, 2(1), 69-74, 1997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.Nelson T., Hettinger L., Cunningham J., Roe M., Lu L., Haas M., Dennis L., Pick H., Junker A., Berg C., (1996) "Brain-Body-Actuated Control: Assessment of an Alternative Control Technology For Virtual Environments," Image Conf., Scottsdale AZ. P 16-21Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Polak, M., Kostov, A., (1997),"Development Of Brain- Computer Interface: Preliminary Results," Proceedings - 19 th International Conference - IEEE/EMBS Oct. 30,1997 - Nov. 2, 1997, Chicago, Illinois, p1543 - 6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improving the performance of the cyberlink mental interface with “yes / no program”

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              March 2001
              559 pages
              ISBN:1581133278
              DOI:10.1145/365024

              Copyright © 2001 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 March 2001

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '01 Paper Acceptance Rate69of352submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader