skip to main content
10.1145/380752.380797acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

(1 + εΒ)-spanner constructions for general graphs

Published:06 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

An (α,Β)-spanner of a graph G is a subgraph H such that d_H(u,w)\le α\cdot d_G(u,w)+Β for every pair of vertices u,w, where d_{G'}(u,w) denotes the distance between two vertices u and v in G'. It is known that every graph G has a polynomially constructible (2κ-1,0)-spanner (a.k.a. multiplicative (2κ-1)-spanner) of size O(n^{1+1/κ}) for every integer κ\ge 1, and a polynomially constructible (1,2)-spanner (a.k.a. additive 2-spanner) of size \tO(n^{3/2}). This paper explores hybrid spanner constructions (involving both multiplicative and additive factors) for general graphs and shows that the multiplicative factor can be made arbitrarily close to 1 while keeping the spanner size arbitrarily close to O(n), at the cost of allowing the additive term to be a sufficiently large constant. More formally, we show that for any constant ε, δ > 0 there exists a constant Β = Β(ε, δ) such that for every n-vertex graph G there is an efficiently constructible (1+ ε, Β)-spanner of size O(n^{1 + δ}). It follows that for any constant ε, δ > 0 there exists a constant Β(ε, δ) such that for any n-vertex graph G = (V,E) there exists an efficiently constructible subgraph (V,H) with O(n^{1 +δ}) edges such that d_H(u,w) \le (1 + ε) d_G(u,w) for every pair of vertices.

References

  1. 1.I. Althofer, G. Das, D. Dobkin, D. Joseph and J. Soares, On Sparse Spanners of Weighted Graphs, Discrete & Computational Geometry 9, (1993), 81-100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Baruch Awerbuch and David Peleg, Sparse partitions, Proc. 31st IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, 503-513, October 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.R. D. Carr, S. Doddi, G. Konjevod, M. V. Marathe, On the Red-Blue Set Cover Problem, Proc. 11th ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.B. Chandra, G. Das, G. Narasimhan and J. Soares, New Sparseness Results on Graph Spanners, Proc. 8th ACM Symp. on Computat. Geometry, 192-201, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.L.P. Chew, There is a planar graph almost as good as the complete graph, 2nd Symp. on Computational Geometry, pages 169-177, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.D.P. Dobkin, S.J. Friedman and K.J. Supowit, Delaunay graphs are almost as good as complete graphs, Proc. 31st IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, 1987, 20-26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.D. Dor, S. Halperin, U. Zwick, All pairs almost shortest paths, SIAM Journal on Computing 29, (2000), 1740-1759. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Y. Dodis and S. Khanna, Designing Networks with Bounded Pairwise Distance, Proc. 30th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.M.-L. Elkin and D. Peleg, The Hardness of Approximating Spanner Problems, Proc. 17th Symp. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lille, France, Feb. 2000, 370-381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.M.-L. Elkin and D. Peleg, Strong Inapproximability of the Basic k-Spanner Problem, Proc. 27th Int. Colloq. on Automata, Languages and Programming, Geneva, Switzerland, July 2000, 636-648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.M.-L. Elkin and D. Peleg, The Client-Server 2-Spanner Problem and Applications to Network Design, Technical Report MCS99-24, the Weizmann Institute of Science, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.M.-L. Elkin and D. Peleg, Approximating k-Spanner Problems for k >2, Technical Report MCS00-14, the Weizmann Institute of Science, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.D. Hochbaum, Approximation Algorithms for NP-hard Problems, PWS Publishing Company, Boston, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.G. Kortsarz, On the Hardness of Approximating Spanners, Proc. APPROX., LNCS 1444, Springer-Verlag, New York/Berlin, 135-146, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.G. Kortsarz and D. Peleg, Generating Sparse 2-Spanners, J. Algorithms 17, (1994), 222-236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.C. Li, S. McCormick and D. Simchi-Levi, On the Minimum-Cardinality-Bounded-Diameter and Bounded-cardinality-minimum-diameter Edge Addition Problems, Operation Research Letters 11, (1992), 303-308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.A.L. Liestman and T.C. Shermer, Additive Graph Spanners, Tech. Report No 91-5, Simon Fraser University, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.A.L. Liestman and T.Shermer, Grid Spanners, Networks 23, (1993), 123-133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.D. Peleg, Distributed Computing: A Locality-Sensitive Approach, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.D. Peleg and A. Schaer, Graph Spanners, J. Graph Theory 13, (1989), 99-116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21.D. Peleg and J.D. Ullman, An optimal synchronizer for the hypercube, SIAM J. Computing 18, (1989), 740-747. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.R. Wenger. Extremal graphs with no C41 s, C 6 1 s and C 10 1 s. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 52, (1991), 113-116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. (1 + εΒ)-spanner constructions for general graphs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        STOC '01: Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
        July 2001
        755 pages
        ISBN:1581133499
        DOI:10.1145/380752

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 July 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        STOC '01 Paper Acceptance Rate83of230submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        STOC '24
        56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
        June 24 - 28, 2024
        Vancouver , BC , Canada

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader