Joanie B. Connell
ABSTRACT
This paper uses a social psychological perspective to study the effectiveness of different media of communication and how they influence interactions in social groups and organizations. In particular, we are interested in the social richness of the media-how effectively they convey the personalities and intentions of their users. We studied CMC (email and chat) and voice telephony, and compared them with face-to-face interaction. Study 1 was a controlled laboratory study in which people got acquainted with a partner. Study 2 was a field survey in which employees reported on naturally occurring interactions at work that took place with people of varying levels of power (supervisor, peer, subordinate). The surprising result is that the telephone generally came out on top in both studies, suggesting that the telephone may provide the optimum blend of richness and presence for natural and satisfying interactions.
- 1.Bordia, P., Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature, Journal of Business Communication, 34, (1997), pp. 99-120.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- 2.Buss, A.H., Self-consciousness and social anxiety. Freeman, San Francisco CA, 1980.Google Scholar
- 3.Carver, C.S. and Scheier, M.F., Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York NY, 1981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4.Connell, J.B., Robins, R.W., and Mendelsohn, G.A., The Cyberbias: Do People Make Causal Attributions Differently in Cyberspace?, Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, (San Francisco CA, 1998).Google Scholar
- 5.Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H., Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science, 32, (1986), pp. 554-571. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., and Trevino, L.K., Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: Implications for information systems, MIS Quarterly, 11, (1987), pp. 355-366. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Davis, M.H. and Franzoi, S.L., Self-awareness and selfconscioussness, in Personality, Derlega, Winstead, and Jones, (eds.), 1991.Google Scholar
- 8.Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., and Wilbur, S.B. (eds.), Videomediated communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Johansen, R., Social evaluations of teleconferencing, Telecommunications Policy, 1, (1977), pp. 395-419.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Jones, E.E. and Wortman, C., Ingratiation: An attributional approach. General Learning Press, Morristown NJ, 1973.Google Scholar
- 11.Keppel, G. and Zedeck, S., Data analysis for research designs. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York NY, 1989.Google Scholar
- 12.Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., and McGuire, T.W., Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication, American Psychologist, 39, (1984), pp. 1123-1134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13.Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L., Group decision making and communication technology, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 52, (1992), pp. 96-123.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14.Lea, M., O'Shea, T., Fung, P., and Spears, R., 'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications, in Contexts of computer-mediated communication., Martin, L., (ed.): Harvester Wheatsheaf, London England, 1992, pp. 89-112.Google Scholar
- 15.Lea, M. and Spears, R., Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. Special Issue: Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware, I, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, (1991), 283-301. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Matheson, K. and Zanna, M.P., Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me. Special Issue: Computing: Social and policy issues, Social Science Computer Review, 8, (1990), pp. 1-12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Matheson, K.J. and Zanna, M.P., The impact of computermediated communication on self-awareness, Computers in Human Behavior, 4, (1988), pp. 221-233.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18.Reid, A., Comparing telephone with face-to-face contact, in The social impact of the telephone, Pool, I.d.S., (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge MA 1977, pp. 386-415.Google Scholar
- 19.Rice, R.E., Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness, Organization Science, 3, (1992), pp. 475-500.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Rocco, E., Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact, in Proceedings CHI '98 (Los Angeles CA, 1998) ACM Press, 496-502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R.A., and Riordan, C.A., Impression Management in Organizations. Routledge, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
- 22.Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B., The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, London England, 1976.Google Scholar
- 23.Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., and McGuire, T.W., Group processes in computer-mediated communication, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 37, (1986), pp. 157-187.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 24.Smilowitz, M., Compton, D.C., and Flint, L., The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual's judgment: A study based on the methods of Asch's social influence experiment, Computers in Human Behavior, 4, (1988), pp. 311-321.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 25.Straus, S., Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups, Human-computer Interaction, 12, (1997), pp. 227-266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.Straus, S.G. and McGrath, J.E., Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, (1994), pp. 87-97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 27.Walther, J.B. and Burgoon, J.K., Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, Human Communication Research, 19, (1992), pp. 50-88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 28.Whittaker, S. and O'Conaill, B., The role of vision in faceto-face and mediated communication, in Video-mediated communication. In Computers, cognition, and work., Finn, K.E., Sellen, A.J., and Wilbur, S.B., (eds.): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, 1997, pp. 23-49.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Effects of communication medium on interpersonal perceptions
Recommendations
Hanging on the ‘wire: a field study of an audio-only media space
Special issue on speech as dataThe primary focus of this article is an analysis of an audio-only media space from a computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) perspective. To explore whether audio by itself is suitable for shared media systems, we studied a workgroup using an audio-...
Effects of Duration and Laughter on Subjective Happiness Within Different Modes of Communication
Media naturalness theory and social information processing theory make competing predictions regarding the effectiveness of different modes of communication at creating and maintaining emotionally intense social relationships. We explored how the ...
From social anxiety to interpersonal connectedness
The present research examined whether social anxiety moderates the potential relationship between conversation medium and interpersonal connectedness. Hypotheses predicted that individuals with high social anxiety would demonstrate greater interpersonal ...
Comments