skip to main content
10.1145/503376.503381acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Movement model, hits distribution and learning in virtual keyboarding

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

In a ten-session experiment, six participants practiced typing with an expanding rehearsal method on an optimized virtual keyboard. Based on a large amount of in-situ performance data, this paper reports the following findings. First, the Fitts-digraph movement efficiency model of virtual keyboards is revised. The format and parameters of Fitts' law used previously in virtual keyboards research were incorrect. Second, performance limit predictions of various layouts are calculated with the new model. Third, learning with expanding rehearsal intervals for maximum memory benefits is effective, but many improvements of the training algorithm used can be made in the future. Finally, increased visual load when typing previously practiced text did not significantly change users' performance at this stage of learning, but typing unpracticed text did have a performance effect, suggesting a certain degree of text specific learning when typing on virtual keyboards

References

  1. Baddeley, Human Memory - Theory and Practice. Revised Edition ed. 1998, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper, W.E., ed. Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting. 1983, Springer-Verlag: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dvorak, A., N.L. Merrick, W.L. Dealey, and G.C. Ford, Typewriting Behavior. 1936, New York: American Book Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitts, P.M., The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954. 47: p. 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Getschow, C.O., M.J. Rosen, and Goodenough-Trepagnier. A systematic approach to design a minimum distance alphabetical keyboard. in Proceedings of RESNA (Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America) 9th Annual Conference. 1986. Minneapolis, Minnesota. p. 396--398.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Landauer, T.K. and R.A. Bjork, Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning, in practical aspects of memory, P.E.M. M.M. Gruneberg, & R.N. Sykes, Editor. 1978, Academic Press: London. p. 625--632.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis, J.R., P.J. Kennedy, and M.J. LaLomia. Development of a Digram-Based Typing Key Layout for Single-Finger/Stylus Input. in Proceedings of The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. MacKenzie, I.S., Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 1992. 7: p. 91--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. MacKenzie, I.S., A. Sellen, and W. Buxton. A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. in Proceedings of CHI'91: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1991. New Orleans, Lousiana. p. 161--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. MacKenzie, I.S. and S.X. Zhang. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. in Proceedings of CHI'99: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1999. p. 25--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Neisser, U., Memory: What are the important questions?, in Practical aspects of memory, M.M. Gruneberg, P.G. Morris, and R.N. Sykes, Editors. 1978, Academic Press: London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sears, A., J.A. Jacko, J. Chu, and F. Moro, The role of visual search in the design of effective soft keyboards. Behaviour and Information Technology, 2001. 20(3): p. 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, B.A. and S. Zhai. Optimised Virtual Keyboards with and without Alphabetical Ordering - A Novice User Study. in Proceedings of INTERACT'2001 - IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2001. Tokyo, Japan: IFIP. p. 92--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Soukoreff, W. and I.S. MacKenzie, Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speeds using a stylus and keyboard,. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1995. 14: p. 379--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yamada, H., A historical study of typewriters and typing methods: from the position of planning Japanese parallels. Journal of Information Processing, 1980. 2(4): p. 175--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhai, S., M. Hunter, and B.A. Smith. The Metropolis Keyboard - an exploration of quantitative techniques for virtual keyboard design. in Proceedings of The 13th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). 2000. San Diego, California: ACM. p. 119--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zhai, S., B.A. Smith, and M. Hunter, Performance Optimization of Virtual Keyboards. Human-Computer Interaction, 2001. in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Movement model, hits distribution and learning in virtual keyboarding

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2002
            478 pages
            ISBN:1581134533
            DOI:10.1145/503376
            • Conference Chair:
            • Dennis Wixon

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 April 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate61of414submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader