skip to main content
10.1145/503376.503388acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Acquisition of expanding targets

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

There exist several user interface widgets that dynamically grow in size in response to the user's focus of attention. Some of these, such as icons in toolbars, expand to facilitate their selection - allowing for a reduced initial size in an attempt to optimize screen space use. However, selection performance may be degraded by this decreased initial widget size. We describe an experiment which explores the effects of varying parameters of expansion techniques in a selection task. Our results suggest that Fitts' law can model and predict performance in such tasks. They also indicate that performance is governed by the target's final size, not its initial one. Further, performance is dependent on the target's final size even when the target only begins expanding as late as after 90% of the movement towards the target has already been completed. These results indicate that expanding widgets can be used without sacrificing performance

References

  1. www.apple.com/macosx/theater/dock.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bederson, B. (2000). Fisheye menus. ACM UIST 2000 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 217--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Card, S., English, W., & Burr, B.J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21. p. 601--613.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crossman, E., & Goodeve, P. (1963/1983). Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts' law. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A. p. 251--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Douglas, S., & Mithal, A.K., The ergonomics of computer pointing devices. 1997: Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47. p. 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Furnas, G. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. ACM CHI 1986 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 16--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Keele, S.W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70. p. 387--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. MacKenzie, S. (1992). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7. p. 91--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mackinlay, J., Robertson, G., & Card, S. (1991). The perspective wall: Detail and context smoothly integrated. ACM CHI 1991 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 56--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Meyer, D.E., Smith, J.E., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R.A., & Wright, C.E. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95. p. 340--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosenbaum, D., Human motor control. 1991, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmidt, R.A., Zalaznik, H.N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J.S., & Quinn, J.T. (1979). Motor output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86. p. 415--451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Acquisition of expanding targets

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2002
          478 pages
          ISBN:1581134533
          DOI:10.1145/503376
          • Conference Chair:
          • Dennis Wixon

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 April 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate61of414submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader