ABSTRACT
Many CSCW projects dealing with individual availability and interruption filtering achieve only limited success. Perhaps this is because designers of such systems have limited evidence to draw upon; most data on interruption management is at least a decade old. This study uses an empirical sampling method and qualitative interviews to examine attitudes toward availability and interruption. Specifically, we analyze how corporate research managers spend their time and look at how their attitudes toward interruption relate to their various activities. Attitudes toward interruption are marked by a complex tension between wanting to avoid interruption and appreciating its usefulness. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for design, suggesting that the notion of socially translucent systems may be a fruitful approach
- Ackerman, M. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2--3). 181--205. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. and Carlis, J.V. The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface. in Proceedings of INTERACT 2001, NCP, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.Google Scholar
- Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. and Carlis, J.V. Measuring the Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance in the User Interface. in IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2000, IEEE, Nashville, TN, 2000, 757--762.Google Scholar
- Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2001.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cohen, M.D. and March, J.G. Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1974.Google Scholar
- Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M. and Horvitz, E. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. in Interact 2001 Conference Proceedings, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.Google Scholar
- Davenport, T.H. and Beck, J.C. The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
- Derber, C. The Pursuit of Attention: Power and Ego in Everyday Life (Second Edition). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1979, 2000.Google Scholar
- Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W.A. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Support Social Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (1). 59--83. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hall, E.T. The Silent Language. Anchor Books, New York, NY, 1959, 1981.Google Scholar
- Kristoffersen, S. and Ljungberg, F. An Empirical Study of How People Establish Interaction: Implications for CSCW Session Management Models. in Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI '99, ACM Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 1999, 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kubey, R.W. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. Television and the Quality of Life: How Viewing Shapes Everyday Experience. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990.Google Scholar
- Lave, J. and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McFarlane, D.C. Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction. in Sasse, A. and Johnson, C. eds. Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'99), IOS Press, 1999, 295--303.Google Scholar
- Milewski, A.E. and Smith, T.M. Providing Presence Cues to Telephone Users. in Whittaker, S. and Kellogg, W. eds. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2000 Conference, ACM Press, Philadelphia, PA, 2000, 89--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Conaill, B. and Frohlich, D. Timespace in the Workplace: Dealing with Interruptions. in Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing (CHI '95), ACM Press, Denver, CO, 1995, 262--263. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, G.M. and Olson, J.S. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2&3). 139--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Panko, R.R. Managerial Communication Patterns. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2 (1). 95--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rodenstein, R., Abowd, G. and Catrambone, R. OwnTime: A System for Timespace management. in Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI '99, ACM Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sproull, L.S. The Nature of Managerial Attention. in Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, JAI Press, 1984, 9--27.Google Scholar
- Sproull, L.S. The Nature of Managerial Attention. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, 1. 9--27.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. Gender Differences in Conversational Coherence: Physical Alignment and Topical Cohesion. in Tannen, D. ed. Gender and Discourse, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1994, 85--135.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. That's Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks your Relations with Others. William Morrow and Co., New York, NY, 1986.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. William Morrow and Co., New York, NY, 1990.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": availability and interruption in research management
Recommendations
Technology-mediated interruption management
Previous research into providing interpersonal technology-mediated interruption management support has predominantly been conducted from a paradigmatic standpoint that focused on modeling the context of the person being interrupted (interruptee) such as ...
Knock, knock! who's there? Putting the user in control of managing interruptions
The abundance of communication technology, such as the omnipresence of cell phones, has not only increased our ability to reach people anytime anywhere, but also the likelihood of being interrupted. As a result, there is value in understanding how to ...
Just one more thing!: investigating mobile follow-up questions for opinion polls on public displays
PerDis '16: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive DisplaysIn this ongoing work we explore the advanced interplay of smartphones and opinion polls on public displays which enables in-depth follow-up questions beyond the original poll issue on the personal device. To investigate the acceptance of such follow-up ...
Comments