ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the use of gesture and non-speech audio as ways to improve the user interface of a mobile music player. Their key advantages mean that users could use a player without having to look at its controls when on the move. Two very different evaluations of the player took place: one based on a standard usability experiment (comparing the new player to a standard design) and the other a video analysis of the player in use. Both of these showed significant usability improvements for the gesture/audio-based interface over a standard visual/pen-based display. The similarities and differences in the results produced by the two studies are discussed
- Blattner, M., Sumikawa, D. and Greenberg, R. Earcons and icons: Their structure and common design principles. Human Computer Interaction 4, 1 (1989), 11--44.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brewster, S.A. and Cryer, P.G. Maximising Screen-Space on Mobile Computing Devices. In Summary Proceedings of ACM CHI'99 (Pittsburgh, PA) ACM Press, 1999, pp. 224--225.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brewster, S.A. and Walker, V.A. Non-Visual Interfaces for Wearable Computers. In Proceedings of IEE workshop on Wearable Computing (IEE, London) IEE, 00/145, 2000.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brewster, S.A., Wright, P.C. and Edwards, A.D.N. An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of ACM/IFIP INTERCHI'93 (Amsterdam, Holland) ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 1993, pp. 222--227.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark-Carter, D.D., Heyes, A.D. and Howarth, C. The efficiency and walking speed of visually impaired people. Ergonomics 29, 6 (1986), 779--789.]]Google Scholar
- Garcia, L. and Quek, F. Qualitative research in information systems: Time to be subjective? In Proceedings of Information systems and qualitative research (Philadelphia, USA), Chapman and Hall, 1997, pp. 444--465.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gentner, D. and Nielsen, J. The anti-mac interface. Communications of the ACM 39, 8 (1996), 70--82.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harrison, B.L., Fishkin, K.P., Gujar, A., Mochon, C. and Want, R. Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! An exploration of manipulative user interfaces. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'98 (Los Angeles, CA) ACM Press Addison-Wesley, 1998, pp. 17--24.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hart, S.G. and Wickens, C. Workload assessment and prediction. In MANPRINT, an approach to systems integration, Booher, H.R. (Ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1990, 257--296.]]Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. Usability and Mobility; Interactions on the move. In First Workshop on HCI with Mobile Devices (Glasgow, UK) Glasgow University, 1998.]]Google Scholar
- Kvale, S. Issues of validity in qualitative research. Chartwell Bratt, London, 1989.]]Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.]]Google Scholar
- Lee, S.H. Usability testing for developing effective interactive multimedia software: concepts, dimensions, and procedures. Educational Technology & Society 2, 2 (1999).]]Google Scholar
- Long, A., Landay, J. and Rowe, L. Implications for a gesture design tool. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'99 (Pittsburgh, PA) ACM Press Addison-Wesley, 1999, pp. 40--47.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nardi, B.A. and Zarmer, C.L. Beyond models and metaphors: Visual formalism in user interface design. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 4 (1993), 5--33.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pauws, S., Bouwhuis, D. and Eggen, B. Programming and enjoying music with your eyes closed. In Proceedings of ACM CHI2000 (The Hague, The Netherlands) ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 2000, pp. 376--383.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petrie, H., Furner, S. and Strothotte, T. Design Lifecycles and Wearable Computers for Users with Disabilities. In First workshop on HCI mobile devices (Glasgow, UK) Glasgow University, 1998.]]Google Scholar
- Pirhonen, A. Analysis of the concept of redundancy concerning the design of multimodal combinations of output-elements. In Proceedings of APCHI98 (Los Alamitos, CA) IEEE, 1998, pp. 273--278.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pirhonen, A. Creating virtual objects. In Proceedings of IRIS 22 Technical Report TR-21, Vol. 3. University of Jyväskylä, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, 1999, pp. 57--69.]]Google Scholar
- Sawhney, N. and Schmandt, C. Nomadic Radio: speech and audio interaction for contextual messaging in nomadic environments. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 7, 3 (2000), 353--383.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices
Recommendations
Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design
For centuries, learning and development has been supported by physical activity and manipulating physical objects. With the introduction of embedded technologies, opportunities for employing tangible or embodied interaction for learning and development ...
Gestural Interfaces Touchscreen: Thinking Interactions beyond the Button from Interaction Design for Gmail Android App
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments - Volume 8518The design of interfaces for mobile devices (smartphones, tablets) is still very tied to the WIMP paradigm (abbreviation for "windows, icons, menus and pointers"). Thus, the potential use of gestures (touch screen) is often not used efficiently. ...
Touch screen gestures for web browsing tasks
One-step gestures such as a single swipe are preferred over multi-step gestures.The most common binding was object-centric.Most gestures used one finger, but five-finger gesture are used for larger devices.Gestures should reflect the desired action and ...
Comments