skip to main content
article

Factors influencing the formation of a user's perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation

Published:01 July 2001Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Understanding how users form perceptions of a software innovation would help software designers, implementers and users in their evaluation, selection, implementation and on-going use of software. However, with the exception of some recent work, there is little research examining how a user forms his or her perceptions of an innovation over time. To address this research need, we report on the experiences of a health planner using a DSS software tool for health planning over a 12-month period. Using diffusion theory as outlined by Rogers, we interpret the user's perceptions of the software following Rogers' perceived characteristics of the innovation. Furthermore, we show how our user justifies her attitudes toward the technology using 5 important factors during 3-, 6- and 12-month interviews: stage of adoption, implementation processes, organizational factors, subjective norms, and user competence. Results are compared with key IS research in these areas, and the implications of these findings on the diffusion of decision support systems are discussed.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). "The theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 179-211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Attewell, P. (1992). "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Baronas, A. K., and Louis, M. R. (1988). "Restoring a Sense of Control During Implementation: How User Involvement Leads to System Acceptance," MIS Quarterly, March, pp. 111-123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brancheau, J. C., and Wetherbe, J. C. (1990). "The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing," Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 115-143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., and Sein, Maung., (1990). "The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training," MIS Quarterly, March, pp. 101-119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Compeau, D. (1999). "Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study," MIS Quarterly, June, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 145-158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cooper, R. B., and Zmud, R. W. (1990). "Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach," Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 123-139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 319-339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Eveland, J. D. (1979). "Issues in Using the Concept of 'Adoption of Innovation,'" paper presented at the American Society for Public Administration, Baltimore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eveland, J. D., and Tornatzky, L. (1990). "The Deployment of Technology," in Tornatzky, L., and Fletscher, M. (Eds.), The Processes of Technological Innovation, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 117-147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fichman, R. G., and Kemerer, C. F. (1999). "The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps," Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 255-275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginzberg, M. J. (1981). "Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions," Management Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 459-478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. (1995). "Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, p. 213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Green, LW, Kreuter, MW. (1999). Health Promotion Planning: Third Edition, Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, L. W., and Johnson, J. L. (1996). "Dissemination and Utilization of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Knowledge: Theory, Research and Experience," Canadian Journal of Public Health, No. 87, (Supplement 2), pp. S11-S17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson J. L., Green L. W., Frankish C. J., MacLean D. R., and Stachenko S. (1996). "A Dissemination Research Agenda to Strengthen Health Promotion and Disease Prevention," Canadian Journal of Public Health, No. 87, (Supplement 2), pp. S5-S10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, N. L. (1999). "Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Pre-adoption and Post-adoption Beliefs," MIS Quartery, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183-213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kumar, K., van Dissel, H. G., and Bielli, P. (1998). "The Merchant of Prato-revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 199-226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mathieson, K. (1991). "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 173-191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Markus, L. (1983). "Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 430-444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mohr, L. (1987). "Innovation Theory: An Assessment form the Vantage Point of New Electronic Technology in Organizations," in J. Pennings and A. Buitendam (Eds.), New Technology as Organizational Innovation: The Development and Diffusion of Microelectronics, Cambridge: Ballinger, pp. 13-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore, G. C., Benbasat, I. (1991). "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 192-222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Munro, M., Huff, S., Marcolin, B., and Compeau, D. (1997). "Understanding and Measuring User Competence," Information and Management, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 45-57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Newman, M., and Noble, F. (1990). "User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study," Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 89-118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nutbeam D. (1996). "Improving the Fit Between Research and Practice in Health Promotion: Overcoming Structural Barriers," Canadian Journal of Public Health, No. 87, (Supplement 2), pp. s18-s23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Orlandi, M. A. (1996). "Health Promotion Technology Transfer: Organizational Perspectives," Canadian Journal of Public Health, No. 87, (Supplement 2), pp. s28-s33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Parthasarathy, M., and Bhattacherjee, A. (1998). "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services," Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 362-379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Robey, D., Farrow, D., and Franz, C. R. (1989). "Group Process and Conflict in System Development," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 1172-1191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, (4th edition). New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tan, J., and Benbasat, I. (1990). "Processing of Graphical Information: A Decomposition Taxonomy to Match Data Extraction Tasks and Graphical Representations," Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 416-439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995). "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Todd, P., and Benbasat, I. (1991). "An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids on Decision Making Strategies," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 87-115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tyre, M. J., and Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). "Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 98-118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Van De Ven, A. (1986). "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 590-607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Van De Ven, A., and Polley. (1992). "Learning while Innovating," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 92-116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Venkatesh, V. (1999). "Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 239-260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Vessey, V., and Galletta, D. (1991). "Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 63-84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Vitalari, N. (1985). "The Need for Longitudinal Designs in the Study of Computing Environments," in E. Mumford et al. (Eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 243-265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Newbury Park: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Factors influencing the formation of a user's perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader