Giampio Bracchi
- 1 AHLSE'N, M., BJORNERSTEDT, A., BmTTS, S., HULTEN, C., AND SODERLUND, L. A survey of office information systems. SYSLAB Working Paper No. 44, Stockholm, Jan. 1983.Google Scholar
- 2 AIELLO, L., NARDI, D., AND PANTI, M. Structural office modeling: A first step toward the office expert system. To appear in Proceedings 2nd ACM Conference on Office Information Systems (Toronto, June 1984), ACM, New York. Google Scholar
- 3 BAILEY, A., GERLACH, J., MCAFEE, P., AND WHINSTON, A. Internal accounting controls in the office of the future. IEEE Computer 14, 5 (May 1981), 59-70.Google Scholar
- 4 BAILEY, A., GERLACH, J., MCAFEE, P., AND WHINSTON, A. An OIS model for internal accounting control evaluation. ACM Trans. Office Inf. Syst. 1, 1 (Jan. 1983), 25-44. Google Scholar
- 5 BARBER, G. Supporting organizational problem solving with a work station. ACM Trans. Office Inf. Syst. 1, 1 (Jan. 1983), 45-67. Google Scholar
- 6 BARRON, J. Dialogue and process design for interactive information systems using Taxis. In Proceedings of ACM SIGOA Conference on Office Systems (Philadelphia, June 1982), ACM, New York, 12-20. Google Scholar
- 7 BRACCHI, G., AND PERNICI, B. SOS: A conceptual model for office information systems. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Database Week Conference (San Jose, Calif., May 1983), ACM, New York, 108-116. Google Scholar
- 8 COOK, C. Streamlining office procedures--an analysis using the information control net model. in Proceedings AFIPS National Computer Conference (May 1980), 555-565.Google Scholar
- 9 DAVIS, G. Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Syst. J. 21, 1 (1982), 4-30.Google Scholar
- 10 DUMAS, P., DU ROURE, G., ZANETTI, C., CONRATH, D., AND MAIRET, J. MOBILE-Burotique: Prospects for the future. In Office Information Systems, N. Naffah, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, 471-480.Google Scholar
- 11 ELLIS, C., AND NUTT, G. Office information systems and computer science. ACM Comput. Surv. 12, 1 (Mar. 1980), 27-60. Google Scholar
- 12 ELHS, C., AND BERNAL, i. OFFICETALK-D: An experimental office information system. In Proceedings ACM SIGOA Conference on Office Systems (Philadelphia, June 1982), ACM, New York, 131-140. Google Scholar
- 13 GIBBS, S. Office information models and the representation of 'office objects'. In Proceedings ACM SIGOA Conference on Office Systems (Philadelphia, June 1982), ACM, New York, 21-26. Google Scholar
- 14 HAMMER, M., HOWE, W., KRUSKAL, V., AND WLADAWSKY, I. A very high level programming language for data processing applications. Commun. ACM 20, 11 (Nov. 1977), 832-840. Google Scholar
- 15 HAMMER, M., AND KUNIN, J. Design principles of an office specification language. In Proceedings AFIPS National Computer Conference (May 1980), 541-547.Google Scholar
- 16 KONSYNSKI, B., BRACKER, L., AND BRACKER, W. A model for specification of office communications. IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-30, 1 (Jan. 1982), 27-36.Google Scholar
- 17 LUM, V., CHOY, D., AND SHU, N. OPAS: An office procedure automation system. IBM Syst. J. 21, 3 (1982), 327-350.Google Scholar
- 18 MALONE, T. How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Trans. Office Inf. Syst. 1, 1 (Jan. 1983), 99-112. Google Scholar
- 19 MYLOPOULOS, J., BERNSTEIN, P., AND WONG, H. A language facility for designing databaseintensive applications. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 5, 2 (June 1980). Google Scholar
- 20 NAFFAH, N., Ed. Integrated Office Systerns--Burotics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google Scholar
- 21 NAFFAH, N., Ed. Office Information Systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982. Google Scholar
- 22 NEWMAN, W. Office models and office systems design. In Integrated Office Systems, N. Naffah, Ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, 3-10.Google Scholar
- 23 OLLE, T., SOL, H., AND VERRIJN-STUART. A., Eds. Information systems design methodologies: A comparative review. In Proceedings IFIP TC 8 Working Conference on Comparative Review of Information Systems Design Methodologies (May 1982), North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- 24 RICHTER, G. iML--inscribed nets for modeling text processing and data(base) management systems. In Proceedings Very Large Data Bases Conference (Cannes, Sept. 1981), 363-375.Google Scholar
- 25 SANTONI, i., AND ZECCHINI, i. A methodology for the analysis of office work. In Proceedings Italian Computing Association Annual Congress (Pavia, Sept. 1981), 173-180 (in Italian).Google Scholar
- 26 SIRBU, M., SCHOICHET, S., KUNIN, J., AND HAMMER, M. OAM: An office analysis methodology. MIT, Office Automation Group Memo OAM-016, 1981.Google Scholar
- 27 SMITH, J., AND SMITH, D. Database abstractions: Aggregation and generalization. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2, 2 (June 1977), 105-133. Google Scholar
- 28 TSICHRITZlS, D. Form management. Commun. ACM 25, 7 (July 1982), 453-478. Google Scholar
- 29 ZISMAN, M. Use of production systems for modeling asynchronous, concurrent processes. In Pattern Directed Inference Systems, Waterman and Hayes-Roth, Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1978, 53-68.Google Scholar
- 30 ZLOOF, M., AND DE JONG, S. The System for Business Automation (SBA): Programming language. Commun. ACM 20, 6 (June 1977), 324-343. Google Scholar
- 31 ZLOOF, M. QBE/OBE: A language for office and business automation. IEEE Computer 14, 5 (May 1981), 13-22.Google Scholar
- 32 ZLOOF, M. Office-by-Example: A business language that unifies data, word processing, and electronic mail. IBM Syst. J. 21, 3 (1982), 272-304.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The design requirements of office systems
Comments