skip to main content
10.1145/52324.52332acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Design of the x-kernel

Published:01 August 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

The x-kernel is a configurable operating system kernel designed to support experimentation in interprocess communication and distributed programming. The x-kernel's underlying architecture provides a rich set of abstractions that are used to construct and compose communication protocols. The architecture is interesting because the abstractions are both general enough to accommodate a wide range of protocols and efficient enough to provide a useful testbed in which protocol performance can be accurately measured.

References

  1. Acce86.M. Accetta, et. al. Mach: A New Kernel Foundation for UNIX Development. In Proceedings of Summer Usenix, July 1986.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andr88.G.R. Andrews, et. al. An overview of the SR language and implementation. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 10(1), 51-86, January 1988.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. AT&T87.AT&T. UNIX System V Streams Programmer's Guide. Prentice-Hall, }987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Blac87.A. Black, N. Hutchinson, E. Jul, H. Levy, and L. Carter. Distribution and abstract types in Emerald. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(1 ):65-76, January 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cher85.D. Cheriton and W. Zwaenepoel. Distributed Process Groups in the V Kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 3(2), 77-107, May 1985.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cher87.D. Cheriton. VMTP: A transport protocol for the next generation of communications systems. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM '86 (Aug. 1987), 406- 415.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Clar85.D.D. Clark. The structuring of systems using upcalls. In Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Operating System Principles, 171-180, December 1985.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Habe76.A.N. Habermann, L. Flon, and L. Cooprider. Modularization and hierarchy in a family of operating systems. Communications of the ACM, 19(5):266-272, May 1976.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hutc87.N.C. Hutchinson. Emerald, An Object-Based Language for Distributed Programming. PhD dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, january 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hutc88.N.C. Hutchinson, S. Mishra, L.L. Peterson, and V. Thomas. Tools for Implementing Network Protocols. In preparation.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Leff78.S.J. Leffler, R.S. Fabray, and W.N. Joy. A 4.2BSD interprocess communication primer. In Unix Programmer's Manual, Volume 2C, University of California at Berkeley, 1978.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Leff83.S.J. Leffler, W.N. Joy, and R.S. Fabray. 4.2BSD Networking Implementation Notex. In Unix Programmer's Manual, Volume 2C, University of California at Berkeley, 1983.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mock87.P. Mockapetris. Domain Names--Implementation and Specification. Request For Comments 1035. USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Ray, Calif., November 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pete87.L.L. Peterson. Preserving context information in an IPC abstraction. In Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Reliability in Distributed Software and Database Systems, pages 22-31, March 1987.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Plum82.D. Plummer. An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol. Request For Comments 826, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Ray, Calif., November 1982.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Post80.J. PosteI. User Datagram ProtocoI. Request For Comments 768, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Ray, Calif., August 1980.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Post81a.J. PosteI. Internet Protocol. Request For Comments 791, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Ray, Calif., September 1981.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Post81b.J. Postel. Internet Message Control Protocol. Request For Comments 792, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Ray, Calif., September 1981.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ritc84.D. M. Ritchie. A stream input-output system. A T&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal, 63(8):311-324, October 1984.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Scot87.M.L. Scott and T.J. LeBlanc. Psyche: A General- Purpose Operating System for Shared-Memory Multiprocessors. Butterfly Project Report 19, Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., july 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. SUN86.SUN Microsystems Inc. Remote Procedure Call Programming Guide. February 1986.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. USC81.USC Information Science Institute. Transmission Control Protocol. Request For Comments 793, Marina del Ray, Calif., September 1981.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design of the x-kernel

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCOMM '88: Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures and protocols
          August 1988
          339 pages
          ISBN:0897912799
          DOI:10.1145/52324
          • Editor:
          • Vinton Cerf
          • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
            ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 18, Issue 4
            August 1988
            338 pages
            ISSN:0146-4833
            DOI:10.1145/52325
            Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1988 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 August 1988

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader