skip to main content
10.1145/544220.544227acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Using librarian techniques in automatic text summarization for information retrieval

Published:14 July 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

A current application of automatic text summarization is to provide an overview of relevant documents coming from an information retrieval (IR) system. This paper examines how Centrifuser, one such summarization system, was designed with respect to methods used in the library community. We have reviewed these librarian expert techniques to assist information seekers and codified them into eight distinct strategies. We detail how we have operationalized six of these strategies in Centrifuser by computing an informative extract, indicative differences between documents, as well as navigational links to narrow or broaden a user's query. We conclude the paper with results from a preliminary evaluation.

References

  1. E. Amitay. What Lays in the Layout: Using anchor-paragraph arrangements to extract descriptions of Web documents. PhD thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, UnpublishedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSI. American national standard for describing books in advertisements, catalogs, promotional materials and book jackets. New York, USA, 1979Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Balay, editor. Guide to Reference Books. American Library Association, Chicago, USA, 11th edition edition, 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. J. Bates. Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(7):205--214, 79Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Borgman. Why are online catalogs hard to use? lessons learned from information-retrieval studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(6):387--400, 1986Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Chamlers and P. Chitson. BEAD: Exploration in information visualization. In Proc. of 15th SIGIR '92, 1992 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Ding, L. Gravano, and N. Shivakumar. Computing geographic scopes of web resources. In Proc. of the 26th Intl. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 2000 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Fidel. Writing abstracts for free-text searching. Journal of Documentation, 42(1):11--21, March 1986Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. V. Hatzivassiliglou, J. L. Klavans, M. L. Holcombe, R. Barzilay, M.-Y. Kan, and K. R. McKeown. Simfinder: A flexible clustering tool for summarization. In Proc. of the Workshop on Automatic Summarization, NAACL 2001, 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. A. Hearst. Tilebars: Visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. In Proc. of CHI 1995, 1995 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Z. Jennerich and E. J. Jennerich. The Reference Interview as a Creative Art. Libraries Unlimited, Littleton, Colorado, 1987Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M.-Y. Kan, K. McKeown, and J. Klavans. Domain-specific informative and indicative summarization for information retrieval. In Proc. of the Document Understanding Conference (DUC), pages 19--26, New Orleans, USA, 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. A. Katz, editor. Introduction to Reference Work. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, fifth edition edition, 1987Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Koenemann and N. Belkin. A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In Proceedings of CHI '96, pages 205--212, Vancouver, Canada, May 1996. ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Library of Congress. Marc 21 format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation. Washington, D.C., USA, 2000. ISN 0660179903Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Liddy. The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: An exploratory study. Information Processing and Management, 27(1):55--81, 1991 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Lok and S. K. Feiner. The AIL automated interface layout system. In Proc. of Intelligent User Interface, 2002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. I. Mani and E. Bloedorn. Summarizing similarities and differences among related documents. Information Retrieval, 1(1-2):35--67, 1999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. McKeown, S.-F. Chang, J. Cimino, S. Feiner, C. Friedman, L. Gravano, V. Hatzivassiloglou, S. Johnson, D. Jordan, J. Klavans, A. Kushniruk, V. Patel, and S. Teufel. PERSIVAL, a system for personalized search and summarization over multimedia healtcare information. In Proc. of the 1st JCDL, Roanoke, USA, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. E. Morse, M. Lewis, and K. A. Olsen. Testing visual information retrieval methodologies case study: Comparative analysis of textual, icon, graphical and "spring" displays. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1):28--40, 2002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. B. Nicolas J. Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. Information Retrieval, pages 55--66, 1993Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. ODP. Open Directory Project guidelines. http://dmoz.org/guidelines.html, Last accessed November 2000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. D. Paice. Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects. Information Processing and Management, 26(1):171--186, 1990 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. H. Sonnenwald. Developing a theory to guide the process of designing information retrieval systems. In Proc. of the 15th SIGIR, 1992 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Witcombe. Art history resources on the web. http://witcombe.sbc.edu/ARTHLinks.html, Last accessed January 2002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using librarian techniques in automatic text summarization for information retrieval

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          JCDL '02: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
          July 2002
          448 pages
          ISBN:1581135130
          DOI:10.1145/544220

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 July 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          JCDL '02 Paper Acceptance Rate69of240submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader