skip to main content
10.1145/563340.563353acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course

Published:27 February 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of pair-programming on student performance in an introductory programming class. Data was collected from approximately 600 students who either completed programming assignments with a partner or programmed independently. Students who programmed in pairs produced better programs, completed the course at higher rates, and performed about as well on the final exam as students who programmed independently. Our findings suggest that collaboration is an effective pedagogical tool for teaching introductory programming.

References

  1. E. M. Horn, W. G. Collier, J. A. Oxford, C. F. Bond, and D. F. Dansereu, "Individual Differences in Dyadic Cooperative Learning," Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), pages 153-160, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. M. O'Donnell and D. F. Dansereu, "Scripted Cooperation in Student Dyads: A Method for Analyzing and Enhancing Academic Learning and Performance," in R. Hartz-Lazarowitz and N. Miller (Eds.) Interactions in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning, pages 120-141, London: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. E. Slavin" "Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: When We Know, What We Need to Know," Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, pages 43-69, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Totten, T. Sills, A., Digby, and P. Russ. Cooperative Learning. New York: Garland, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Cockburn and L. Williams, "The Costs and Benefits of Pair Programming," in Extreme Programming Examined, Addison Wesley-Longman, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. E. Fagan, "Advances in Software Inspections," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12(7), pages 744-751, July 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. V. R. Basili, S. Green, O. Laitenburger, F. Lanubile, F. Shull, S. Sorumgard, and M. Zelkowitz, "The Empirical Investigation of Perspective-Based Reading," Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, 1(2), pages 133-164, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. C. Schlimmer, J. B. Fletcher, and L. A. Hermens, "Team-Oriented Software Practicum," IEEE Transactions on Education, 37(2), pages 212-220, May 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Sauer, D. R. Jeffrey, L. Land, and P. Yetton, "The Effectiveness of Software Development Technical Review: A Behaviorally Motivated Program of Research," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1), pages 1-14, Jan. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. A. Williams and R. R. Kessler, "The Effects of 'Pair-Pressure' and 'Pair-Learning' on Software Engineering Education," Proceedings of Thirteenth Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pages 59-65, March 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. V. Flor and E. L. Hutchins, "Analyzing Distributed Cognition in Software Teams: A Case Study of Team Programming During Perfective Software Maintenance," presented at Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fourth Workshop, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Salomon. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. L. Constantine. Constantine on Peopleware, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Yourdon Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. O. Coplien, "A Development Process Generative Pattern Language," in Pattern Languages of Program Design, J. O. Coplien and D. C. Schmidt, Ed. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley, pages 183-237, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Beck. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Williams, R. A. Kessler, W. Cunningham, and R. Jeffries, "Strengthening the Case for Pair-Programming," IEEE Software, July/Aug. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. T. Nosek, "The Case for Collaborative Programming," Communications of the ACM, pages 105-108, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Anderson, R. Beattie, K. Beck et al., "Chrysler Goes to Extremes," Distributed Computing, pages 24-28, Oct. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. Williams and R. R. Kessler, "Experimenting with Industry's 'Pair-Programming' Model in the Computer Science Classroom," Journal on SW Engineering Education, Dec. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Williams. Pair Programming Questionnaire. 2000. Can be found at http://collaboration.csc.ncsu.edu/questionnaire/questionnaire.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '02: Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
      February 2002
      471 pages
      ISBN:1581134738
      DOI:10.1145/563340
      • cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
        ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 34, Issue 1
        Inroads: paving the way towards excellence in computing education
        March 2002
        417 pages
        ISSN:0097-8418
        DOI:10.1145/563517
        Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2002 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 February 2002

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '02 Paper Acceptance Rate73of234submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader