skip to main content
10.1145/570738.570747acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsnaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks

Published:28 September 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe an ad-hoc localization system for sensor networks and explain why traditional calibration methods are inadequate for this system. Building upon previous work, we frame calibration as a parameter estimation problem; we parameterize each device and choose the values of those parameters that optimize the overall system performance. This method reduces our average error from 74.6% without calibration to 10.1%. We propose ways to expand this technique to a method of autocalibration for localization as well as to other sensor network applications.

References

  1. Paramvir Bahl and Venkata Padmanabhan, "RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system", In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, volume 2, pages 775, 784, March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barrett, R., M. Berry, T. F. Chan, et al., "Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods", SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, T.F. and Y. Li, "A Reflective Newton Method for Minimizing a Quadratic Function Subject to Bounds on Some of the Variables", SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 6, Number 4, pp. 1040--1058, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. von Collani, J. Zhang and A. Knoll, "A Generic Learning Approach to Multisensor Based Control", In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration of Intelligent Systems, Baden-Baden, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ma,D., and Hollerbach, J.M., ``Identifying mass parameters for gravity compensation and automatic torque sensor calibration,'' IEEE Intl Conf Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, April 21-28, pp. 661--666, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Doherty et al, ``Convex position estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks,'' Proc. Infocom 2001, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeremy Elson, Lewis Girod and Deborah Estrin ``Fine-Grained Network Time Synchronization using Reference Broadcasts'', Submitted for review, May 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill, P.E., W. Murray, and M.H. Wright, Practical Optimization, Academic Press, London, UK, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Harter et al., ``The Anatomy of a context-Aware Application,'' Proc. 5th Ann. Int'l Conf. Mobile Computing and networking (MOBICOM 99), ACM Press, New York, 1999, pp. 59--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Hightower, C. Vakili, G. Borriello, and R. Want, ``Design and Calibration of the SpotON Ad-Hoc Location Sensing System'', unpublished, August 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler, K. Pister, ``System architecture directions for network sensors''. ASPLOS 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bruce Hoff, Ronald Azuma, ``Autocalibration of an Electronic Compass in an Outdoor Augmented Reality System'', in Proceedings of IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality 2000, Munich, Germany, 5-6 October 2000, pp. 159--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. Hofmann-Wellenho , H. Lichtenegger , and J.Collins, Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice, Fourth Edition. Springer Verlag, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Paige, C. C. and M. A. Saunders, "LSQR: An Algorithm for Sparse Linear Equations and Sparse Least Squares", ACM Trans. Math. Soft., Vol.8, 1982, pp. 43--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. N. B. Priyantha, A. Chakraborty, H. Balakrishnan, ``The Cricket Location-Support System'', in 6th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Mobile Computing and Networking. Boston, MA, August 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. ``Mica Sensorboard Information'', http://webs.cs.berkeley.edu/tos/sensorboard.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ``LP Series Accelerometer Specifications'', http://www.xbow.com/Products/Product_pdf_files/LP%20Accel.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. ``ISKS Ocean Monitoring System'', http://www.seakeepers.com/installation_manual.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ``Traffic Radar Handbook'', http://copradar.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              WSNA '02: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Wireless sensor networks and applications
              September 2002
              146 pages
              ISBN:1581135890
              DOI:10.1145/570738

              Copyright © 2002 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 28 September 2002

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              WSNA '02 Paper Acceptance Rate15of60submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate15of60submissions,25%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader