skip to main content
article

The effects of information scent on visual search in the hyperbolic tree browser

Published:01 March 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Hyperbolic Tree is a focus + context information visualization that has been developed to amplify users' ability to navigate large tree-structured information systems. Information scent is a theoretical construct that captures one kind of interaction between task and display. Information scent is provided by task-relevant display cues, such as node labels on a tree that influence a user's visual search behavior and navigation decisions. An empirical Accuracy of Scent (AOS) score was developed to characterize a set of tasks that required users to find (Retrieval Tasks) or compare (Comparison Tasks) information in tree structures. Two experiments investigated the effect of information scent (tasks with different AOS scores) on performance with the Hyperbolic Tree Browser and the Microsoft Windows File Browser, which is a widely available conventional browser. Experiment 1 found no overall difference in performance time between the two browsers, but did reveal a marginal interaction of information scent with browser performance on Retrieval Tasks. On high AOS tasks the Hyperbolic showed faster performance, but on low AOS tasks the Windows File Browser showed faster performance. Experiment 2 focused only on the Retrieval tasks and revealed that Hyperbolic Tree users examined more tree nodes at a faster rate and visually searched through the tree hierarchy at a faster rate than users of a Windows File Browser lookalike, however, visual search paths were shortened in dense areas of the Hyperbolic Tree display when information scent was low. Two processes appear to affect visual search in the Hyperbolic display: strong information scent improves visual search, and the crowding of targets in a compressed region degrades visual search especially when there is weak information scent.

References

  1. Bell, W. J. 1991. Searching Behavior: The Behavioral Ecology of Finding Resources. Chapman and Hall, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Card, S., Pirolli, P., Van Der Wege, M., Morrison, J., Reeder, R., Schraedley, P., and Boshart, J. 2001. Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, WA). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., and Schneiderman, B. 1999. Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Card, S. K., Robertson, G. G., and Mackinlay, J. D. 1991. The information visualizer: An information workspace. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '91 (New Orleans). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chi, E., Pirolli, P., Chen, K., and Pitkow, J. E. 2001. Using information scent to model user needs and actions on the Web. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001 (Seattle). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi, E., Pirolli, P., and Pitkow, J. 2000. The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2000 (The Hague). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun, M. M., and Wolfe, J. M. 1996. Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cogn. Psychol. 30, 39--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, H. H. 1973. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 335--359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Czerwinski, M. and Larson, K. 1997. The new Web browsers: They're cool but are they useful? In People and Computers XII: Proceedings of the HCI '97 Conference, H. Thimbleby, B. O'Conaill, and P. Thomas, Eds. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Drury, C. G. and Clement, M. R. 1978. The effect of area, density, and number of background characters on visual search. Hum. Factors 20, 597--602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Furnas, G. W. 1997. Effective view navigation. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '97 (Atlanta). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Huberman, B. A. and Hogg, T. 1987. Phase transitions in artificial intelligence systems. Artif. Intell. 33, 155--171. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lamping, J. and Rao, R. 1994. Laying out and visualizing large trees using a hyperbolic space. In Proceedings of UIST '94 (Marina del Rey, CA). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lamping, J., Rao, R., and Pirolli, P. 1995. A focus + context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. In Proceedings of CHI '95, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Logan, G. D. 1996. The CODE theory of visual attention. Psychol. Rev. 103, 603--649.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mackinlay, J. D., Robertson, G. G., and Card, S. K. 1991. The perspective wall: Detail and context smoothly integrated. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mullet, K., Fry, C., and Schiano, D. 1997. On your marks, get set, browse! In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '97 (Extended Abstracts, Atlanta). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pirolli, P. 1997. Computational models of information scent-following in a very large browsable text collection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '97 (Atlanta). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pirolli, P. 1998. Exploring browser design trade-offs using a dynamical model of optimal information foraging. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '98 (Los Angeles). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. K. 1999. Information foraging. Psychol. Rev. 106, 643--675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pirolli, P., Card, S., and Van Der Wege, M. 2001. Visual information foraging in a focus+context visualization. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001 (Seattle). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., and Gremmen, F. 1999. How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. J. Memory Lang. 41, 416--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Resnikoff, H. L. 1989. The Illusion of Reality. Springer-Verlag, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K., and Mackinlay, J. D. 1993. Information visualization using 3D interactive animation. Commun. ACM 36, 57--71. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stephens, D. W. and Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tullis, T. S. 1985. A computer-based tool for evaluating alphanumeric displays. In Interact '84, B. Shackel, Ed. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 719--723.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. User Interface Engineering. 1999. Designing Information-Rich Web Sites. Author, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ware, C. 1999. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolfe, J. M. 1994. Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 1, 202--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wolfe, J. M. 1998. What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychol. Sci. 9, 33--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Woodruff, A., Faulring, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J., and Pirolli, P. 2001. Using thumbnails to search the Web. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001 (Seattle). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The effects of information scent on visual search in the hyperbolic tree browser

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader